The design of seat suspensions having linear stiffness and damping characteristics involves a tradeoff between three performance measures. These measures are: (1) suspension range of motion, (2) improved average vibration isolation (weighted average across a wide exposure spectrum), and (3) improved isolation at the frequency of peak transmissibility. To overcome the limitations associated with this tradeoff, nonlinear mechanical properties are used here in the design of a seat suspension. From the infinite number of possible nonlinear mechanical characteristics, several possibilities that showed promise in previous studies were selected. The selected nonlinear force-deflection relationship (stiffness) of the seat is described by a combination of cubic and linear terms. The selected damping behavior of the seat is described by a combination of a linear term and a position-dependent term. A lumped parameter model (linear-human/nonlinear-seat) of the human/seat-suspension coupled system and a robust direct search routine are used to obtain pseudo-optimal values of the seat design parameters (mass, stiffness, and damping) via simulation in the time domain. Results indicate that the optimal nonlinear seat suspension is significantly better than the optimal linear seat suspension in overall vibration isolation characteristics.

1.
Pradko, F., Orr, T. R., and Lee, R. A., 1967, “Human Vibration Analysis,” SAE Paper No. 650426.
2.
Kelsey
,
J. L.
, and
Hardy
,
R. J.
,
1975
, “
Driving of Motor Vehicles as a Risk Factor for Acute Herniated Intervertebral Disks
,”
Am. J. Epidemiol.
,
102
, pp.
63
73
.
3.
Rosegger
,
R.
, and
Rosegger
,
S.
,
1960
, “
Health Effects of Tractor Driving
,”
J. Agric. Eng. Res.
,
5
(
3
), pp.
241
242
.
4.
Fishbien
,
W. I.
, and
Salter
,
L. C.
,
1950
, “
The Relationship between Truck and Tractor Driving and Disorders of the Spine and Supporting Structures
,”
Ind. Med. Surg.
,
19
, pp.
444
445
.
5.
Gouw
,
G. J.
,
Rakheja
,
S.
,
Sankar
,
S.
, and
Afework
,
Y.
,
1990
, “
Increased Comfort and Safety of Drivers of Off-highway Vehicles Using Optimal Seat Suspension
,”
SAE Trans.
,
99
, pp.
541
548
.
6.
Amirouche
,
F. M. L.
,
Xie
,
M.
, and
Patwardhan
,
A.
,
1994
, “
Optimization of the Contact Damping and Stiffness Coefficients to Minimize Human Body Vibration
,”
J. Biomech. Eng.
,
116
, pp.
413
420
.
7.
Amirouche
,
F.
,
Palkovics
,
L.
, and
Woodrooffe
,
J.
,
1995
, “
Optimal Driver Seat Suspension Design for Heavy Trucks
,”
Heavy Vehicle Sys., Int. J. Vehicle Des.
,
2
, pp.
18
45
.
8.
Wan
,
Y.
, and
Schimmels
,
J. M.
,
1997
, “
Optimal Seat Suspension Design Based on Minimum ‘Simulated Subjective Response,’ 
J. Biomech. Eng.
,
119
, pp.
409
416
.
9.
Wu, X., Rakheja, S., and Boileau, P., 1999, “Dynamic Performance of Suspension Seats under Vehicular Vibration and Shock Excitations,” SAE Paper No. 1999-01-1304.
10.
Wu
,
X.
, and
Griffin
,
M. J.
,
1998
, “
The Influence of End-stop Buffer Characteristics on the Severity of Suspension Seat End-stop Impacts
,”
J. Sound Vib.
,
215
, pp.
989
996
.
11.
ISO 7096, 2000, “Earth-Moving Machinery—Laboratory Evaluation of Operator Seat Vibration,” International Organization for Standardization.
12.
ISO 2631-1, 1997, “Mechanical Vibration and Shock—Evaluation of Human Exposure to Whole-body Vibration—Part 1: General Requirement,” International Organization for Standardization.
13.
ISO 5007, 1990, “Agricultural Wheeled Tractors—Operator’s Seat—Laboratory Measurement of Transmitted Vibration,” International Organization for Standardization.
14.
78/764/EEC, 1997, “Driver’s Seat on Wheeled Agricultural or Forestry Tractors,” European Economic Community.
15.
PrEN 13490, 1999, “Mechanical Vibration—Industrial Trucks—Laboratory Evaluation of Operator Seat Vibration,” British Standard Institution.
16.
Wan, Y., 1998, “An Investigation onto Linear and Nonlinear Optimal Seat Suspension Designs,” Ph.D. dissertation, Marquette University.
You do not currently have access to this content.