Zero dynamics is an important feature in system analysis and controller design. Its behavior plays a major role in determining the performance limits of certain feedback systems. Since the intrinsic zero dynamics can not be influenced by feedback compensation, it is important to design physical systems so that they possess desired zero dynamics. In the Part I paper, a method is proposed to derive the zero dynamics of SISO systems from bond graph models. Using this approach, the design of physical systems, including the consideration of zero dynamics, can be performed in a systematic way. In this paper, the extension of the proposed method for MIMO systems is presented. It is shown that for MIMO systems, the input-output configurations determine the existence of vector relative degrees. If a system has a vector relative degree, it’s zero dynamics can be identified by a straightforward extension of the proposed method. If a system does not have a vector relative degree, a dynamic extension procedure may be used to fix the structure. By doing so, the zero dynamics can still be identified in a similar manner. It is also shown that if the input-output configurations are ill-designed, not only the relative degrees do not exist, but also the zero dynamics can not be reasonably defined. In that case, independent tracking controls for all the outputs are impossible. Therefore, the results in this paper provide a guideline for the design of the input-output configurations as well as the zero dynamics of MIMO systems.

1.
Breedveld, P. C. “Physical Systems Theory in terms of Bond Graphs,” thesis, Enschede, 1984.
2.
Huang, S.-Y., and Youcef-Toumi, K. “Zero Dynamics of Nonlinear MIMO Systems from System Configurations—A Bond Graph Approach,” Proceedings of IFAC, San Francisco, 1996.
3.
Isidori, Alberto, Nonlinear Control Systems, Second Edition, Springer-Verlag, 1989.
4.
Karnopp, D., Margolis, D., and Rosenberg, R., System Dynamics: A Unified Approach, Second Edition, Wiley, New York, 1990.
5.
Karnopp, D., “Alternative Bond Graph Causal Patterns and Equation formulations for Dynamic Systems,” ASME JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL, pp. 58–63, 1983.
6.
Maschke, B. M., “Contribution to a Bond-graph Approach for the Analysis and Design of Control Laws for Robots with Flexible Links,” PhD thesis, University of PARIS-SUD, Orsay, France, 1990.
7.
Maschke
B. M.
, “
Bond Graphs for the Structural Dynamic Decoupling Problem
,”
Proceedings of MACS
, Vol.
3
, pp.
1074
1078
,
1991
.
8.
Miu
D. K.
, “
Physical Interpretation of Transfer Function Zeros for Simple Control Systems with Mechanical Flexibilities
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL
, Vol.
113
, pp.
419
424
, Sept.
1991
.
9.
Rosenberg, R. C., “State-Space Formulation for Bond Graph Models of Multiport Systems,” ASME JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL, pp. 35–40, 1971.
10.
Slotine, J-J. E., and Lo, WeiPing, Applied Nonlinear Control, Prentice-Hall, 1991.
11.
Wu, S.-T., and Youcef-Toumi, K., “On Relative Degrees and Zero Dynamics from System Configuration,” ASME JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL, 1995.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.