The “clattering” motion that results when flat objects, like portable electronic products, strike the ground at an angle, is introduced and studied. During clattering one corner of the product touches down first, then successive corners strike one or more times, before it either bounces clear, or comes to rest on the floor. (This stands in distinct contrast to standard fragility tests which involve a single impact and no rotation.) The problem is formalized through the small-angle clattering of a unidimensional “bar” which contacts the ground only at its ends. Its equation of motion is constructed via transition matrices that govern the jumps in endpoint velocities from each collision. It is shown that the number and severity of the individual impacts experienced by the bar is highly variable, depending on mass distribution and coefficient of restitution. For several choices of these parameters, graphical results are presented for quantities that bear on shock-damage, such as: the total number of impacts, sequence of linear and angular velocity jumps, total time before clattering ends, total energy loss, peak linear impulse, etc. In particular, it is illustrated that parts of the bar can undergo a rapid sequence of “amplified” velocity reversals. A companion paper (Goyal et al., 1998b) outlines some global results, and practical implications for shock protection.

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Topics:
Dynamics (Mechanics), Equations of motion, Corners (Structural elements), Shock (Mechanics), Collisions (Physics), Damage, Electronic products, Energy dissipation, Impulse (Physics), Rotation, Touch (physiological)
1.
ASTM D 3332–88, 1993, “Standard Test Methods for Mechanical-Shock Fragility of Products, Using Shock Machines,” 1993 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 15.09, Philadelphia.
2.
Goldsmith, W., 1960, The Theory and Physical Behaviour of Colliding Solids, Edward Arnold Publishers Ltd., London.
3.
Goyal, S., Papadopoulos, J. M., and Sullivan, P. A., 1998a, “Shock Protection of Portable Electronic Products: Shock Response Spectrum, Damage Boundary Approach, and Beyond,” Shock and Vibration, Wiley, New York, NY, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 169–191.
4.
Goyal, S., Papadopoulos, J. M., Sullivan, P. A., 1998b, “The Dynamics of Clattering II: Global Results and Shock Protection,” ASME JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL, published in this issue pp. 94–102.
5.
Goyal, S., Pinson, E. N., and Sinden, F. W., 1994a, “Simulation of Dynamics of Interacting Rigid Bodies Including Friction I: General Problem and Contact Model,” Engineering With Computers, Springer-Verlag, Ltd., London, Vol. 10, pp. 161–173.
6.
Goyal, S., Pinson, E. N., Sinden, F. W., 1994b, “Simulation of Dynamics of Interacting Rigid Bodies Including Friction II: Software System Design and Implementation,” Engineering With Computers, Springer-Verlag, Ltd., London Vol. 10, pp. 175–195.
7.
Larson
R. G.
,
Goyal
S.
,
Aloisio
C.
,
1996
, “
A Predictive Model for Impact Response of Viscoelastic Polymers in Drop Tests
,”
Rheologica Acta
, Steinkopff Verlag, Vol.
35
, pp.
252
–
264
.
8.
MIL-STD-810E, 1989, Military Standard, Environmental Test Methods and Engineering Guidelines, U.S. Office of Naval Publications, Washington D.C.
9.
Mindlin
R. D.
,
1945
, “
Dynamics of Package Cushioning
,”
Bell Systems Journal
, Vol.
24
, pp.
353
–
461
.
10.
Newton, R. E., 1988, “Theory of Shock Isolation,” Shock & Vibration Handbook, McGraw-Hill, New York, Chapter 31.
11.
Stoianovici
D.
,
Hurmuzlu
Y.
,
1996
, “
A Critical Study of the Applicability of Rigid-Body Collision Theory
,”
ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics
, Vol.
63
, No.
2
, pp.
307
–
316
.
12.
Strang, G., 1988, Linear Algebra and its Applications, Harcourt Brace, San Diego.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.