Pneumatic robot manipulators are characterized by high-order, time-variant actuator dynamics, nonlinearities due to compressibility of air, external disturbances such as static and Coulomb friction, and wide range of payload variations. Conventional PID controllers suffer from problems of gain tuning under these conditions. In this paper, a new control algorithm is proposed for the position and trajectory control of pneumatic actuators based on the sliding mode control approach. The stability of motion is proved for the case of a linear, time-invariant switching surface. A disadvantage of using sliding mode control for third- and higher-order mechanical systems is the need for acceleration feedback. In this paper, to overcome this difficulty we propose the use of differential pressure. The proposed controller is simple, easy to implement, and robust to payload and parametric variations. The effectiveness of the new scheme for position and trajectory control is illustrated by experiments on an industrial piston-driven cylindrical actuator with proportional valves.

1.
Balestrino
A.
,
De Maria
G.
, and
Zinober
A. S. I.
,
1984
, “
Nonlinear Adaptive Model-following Control
,”
Automatica
, Vol.
20
, pp.
559
568
.
2.
Blackburn, J. F., Reethof, G., and Shearer, J. L., 1960, Fluid Power Control, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge.
3.
Caldwell
D. G.
,
Medrano-Cerda
G. A.
, and
Goodwin
M.
,
1995
, “
Control of Pneumatic Muscle Actuators
,”
IEEE Control Systems Magazine
, Vol.
15
, pp.
40
48
.
4.
DeCarlo
R. A.
,
Zak
S. H.
, and
Matthews
G. P.
,
1988
, “
Variable Structure Control of Nonlinear Multivariable Systems: A Tutorial
,”
Proc. of the IEEE
, Vol.
76
, pp.
212
232
.
5.
Hamerlain, M., 1995, “An Anthropomorphic Robot Arm driven by Artificial Muscles using a Variable Structure Control,” Proc. 1995 IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation, Nagoya, pp. 550–555.
6.
Hanmandlu, M., and Pandian, S. R., 1993, “A Model-based Sliding Mode Controller for Robot Manipulators,” Proc. IEEE Conf. Decision and Control, San Antonio, pp. 2155–2156.
7.
Kawamura, S., Miyata, K., Hanafusa, H., and Ishida, K., 1989, “Pl-type Hierarchical Feedback Control Scheme for Pneumatic Robots,” Proc. 1989 IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation, Scottsdale, pp. 1853–1858.
8.
Kiku, N., Kariya, T., Sakamoto, Y., Nakashima, K., and Noritsugu, T., 1991, “High-speed and High Accuracy Positioning of Pneumatic Cylinder with Improved Pulse Driving Method,” Proc. 1991 JSME Annual Meeting, Nagoya, pp. 83–85 (in Japanese).
9.
Lai
J. Y.
,
Meng
C. H.
, and
Singh
R.
,
1990
, “
Accurate Position Control of a Pneumatic Actuator
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL
, Vol.
112
, pp.
734
739
.
10.
McDonell
B. W.
, and
Bobrow
J. E.
,
1993
, “
Adaptive Tracking Control of an Air Powered Robot Actuator
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL
, Vol.
115
, pp.
427
433
.
11.
Noritsugu, T., and Wada, T., 1989, “Adaptive Variable Structure Control of Pneumatically Actuated Robot,” JHPS Int. Symp. on Fluid Power, Tokyo, pp. 591–598.
12.
Noritsugu, T., and M. Takaiwa, 1995, “Robust Positioning Control of Pneumatic Servo System with Pressure Control Loop,” Proc. 1995 IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation, Nagoya, pp. 2613–2618.
13.
Pandian, S. R., Hayakawa, Y., Kamoyama, Y., and Kawamura, S., 1997, “Practical Design of Adaptive Sliding Mode Control of Pneumatic Manipulators,” Proc. Int. Conf. Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics’97, Tokyo.
14.
Slotine
J. J. E.
,
1985
, “
Robust Control of Robot Manipulators
,”
Int. J. Robotics Res.
, Vol.
4
, pp.
49
64
.
15.
Tang
J.
, and
Walker
D.
,
1995
, “
Variable Structure Control of a Pneumatic Actuator
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL
, Vol.
117
, pp.
88
92
.
16.
Tarn
T. J.
,
Bejczy
A. K.
,
Yun
X.
, and
Li
Z.
,
1991
, “
Effect of Motor Dynamics on Nonlinear Feedback Robot Arm Control
,”
IEEE Trans. Robotics and Automation
, Vol.
7
, pp.
114
122
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.