Constant inertia engine models have been used for years by control engineers to attain real-time engine simulations. The accuracy of the estimation largely depends on the selection of the constant engine inertia value used in these engine models. A methodology that uses the least squares method to calculate the engine inertia value for constant inertia engine model is developed. This methodology enables the constant inertia engine model simulations to have minimum acceleration estimation errors. The effects of net external torque, engine geometry, and speed on the inertia value computation are also investigated. Since most of the constant inertia engine models use the averaged engine inertia as the constant inertia value, comparisons of these two inertia values in engine operation simulations are presented. Discussions of the advantages and disadvantages of both methods are also included. Precautions and restrictions of using the methodology are discussed as well.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
March 1996
Technical Briefs
An Analysis of the Effects of Torque, Engine Geometry, and Speed on Choosing an Engine Inertia Model to Minimize Prediction Errors
Chung-Hung Pan,
Chung-Hung Pan
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706
Search for other works by this author on:
John J. Moskwa
John J. Moskwa
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706
Search for other works by this author on:
Chung-Hung Pan
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706
John J. Moskwa
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control. Mar 1996, 118(1): 181-184 (4 pages)
Published Online: March 1, 1996
Article history
Received:
April 1, 1993
Online:
December 3, 2007
Citation
Pan, C., and Moskwa, J. J. (March 1, 1996). "An Analysis of the Effects of Torque, Engine Geometry, and Speed on Choosing an Engine Inertia Model to Minimize Prediction Errors." ASME. J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control. March 1996; 118(1): 181–184. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2801143
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Vibration Suppression Based on Improved Adaptive Optimal Arbitrary-Time-Delay Input Shaping
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control (May 2025)
Robust Fault Detection for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Subject to Denial-of-Service Attacks
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control
Vibration Suppression and Trajectory Tracking with Nonlinear Model Predictive Control for UAM Aircraft
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control
Learning battery model parameter dynamics from data with recursive Gaussian process regression
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control
Related Articles
Examination of Initialization and Geometric Details on the Results of CFD Simulations of Diesel Engines
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (April,2011)
Continuous Variable Transmission With an Inertia-Regulating System
J. Mech. Des (May,2010)
A Nonlinear Clutch Pressure Observer for Automatic Transmission: Considering Drive-Shaft Compliance
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control (January,2012)
On the Modeling of Leg Constraints in the Dynamic Analysis of Gough/Stewart-Type Platforms
J. Comput. Nonlinear Dynam (January,2009)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Dynamic Analysis — Part 1: SDOF Systems and Basics
Pipe Stress Engineering
A Novel Approach for LFC and AVR of an Autonomous Power Generating System
International Conference on Mechanical Engineering and Technology (ICMET-London 2011)
Two Decades of Optimism
Air Engines: The History, Science, and Reality of the Perfect Engine