This three-part paper presents an approach to the control of dynamic interaction between a manipulator and its environment. Part I presented the theoretical reasoning behind impedance control. In Part II the implementation of impedance control is considered. A feedback control algorithm for imposing a desired cartesian impedance on the end-point of a nonlinear manipulator is presented. This algorithm completely eliminates the need to solve the “inverse kinematics problem” in robot motion control. The modulation of end-point impedance without using feedback control is also considered, and it is shown that apparently “redundant” actuators and degrees of freedom such as exist in the primate musculoskeletal system may be used to modulate end-point impedance and may play an essential functional role in the control of dynamic interaction.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
March 1985
Research Papers
Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation: Part II—Implementation
Neville Hogan
Neville Hogan
Department of Mechanical Engineering and Laboratory for Manufacturing and Productivity, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass. 02139
Search for other works by this author on:
Neville Hogan
Department of Mechanical Engineering and Laboratory for Manufacturing and Productivity, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass. 02139
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control. Mar 1985, 107(1): 8-16 (9 pages)
Published Online: March 1, 1985
Article history
Received:
June 1, 1983
Online:
July 21, 2009
Connected Content
This is a companion to:
Stresses in Spur Gear Teeth and Their Strength as Influenced by Fillet
Radius
Citation
Hogan, N. (March 1, 1985). "Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation: Part II—Implementation." ASME. J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control. March 1985; 107(1): 8–16. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3140713
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Design of Attack Resistant Robust Control Based on Intermediate Estimator Approach for Offshore Steel Jacket Structures
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control (September 2025)
Motion Control Along Spatial Curves for Robot Manipulators: A Noninertial Frame Approach
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control (September 2025)
Associate Editor's Recognition
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control (July 2025)
A Case Study Comparing Both Stochastic and Worst-Case Robust Control Co-Design Under Different Control Structures
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control (September 2025)
Related Articles
Recursive Calibration of Industrial Manipulators by Adaptive Filtering
J. Eng. Ind (August,1995)
Wireless Vibrotactile Trainer for Balance Rehabilitation
J. Med. Devices (June,2009)
Development of an Adaptive Force/Position Controller for Robot-Automated Composite Tape-Layering
J. Eng. Ind (August,1993)
Projection-Based Control of Parallel Mechanisms
J. Comput. Nonlinear Dynam (July,2011)
Related Chapters
QP Based Encoder Feedback Control
Robot Manipulator Redundancy Resolution
Feedback-Aided Minimum Joint Motion
Robot Manipulator Redundancy Resolution
Manipulability-Maximizing SMP Scheme
Robot Manipulator Redundancy Resolution