This paper describes the concept for and lessons from the development and field-testing of an open, interoperable communications infrastructure to support automated demand response (auto-DR). Automating DR allows greater levels of participation, improved reliability, and repeatability of the DR in participating facilities. This paper also presents the technical and architectural issues associated with auto-DR and description of the demand response automation server (DRAS), the client/server architecture-based middleware used to automate the interactions between the utilities or any DR serving entity and their customers for DR programs. Use case diagrams are presented to show the role of the DRAS between utility/ISO and the clients at the facilities.

1.
California Energy Commission (CEC), California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC)
,
et al.
, 2005, “
State of California, Energy Action Plan II: Implementation Roadmap for Energy Policies
,” pp.
3
5
, CEC, Jan. 2, http://www.energy.ca.gov/energy_action_plan/2005-09-21_EAP2_FINAL.PDFhttp://www.energy.ca.gov/energy_action_plan/2005-09-21_EAP2_FINAL.PDF.
2.
California Energy Commission (CEC)
, 2003, “
2003 Integrated Energy Policy Report
,” CEC, Jan. 2, http://www.energy.ca.gov/reports/100-03-019F.PDFhttp://www.energy.ca.gov/reports/100-03-019F.PDF.
3.
United States General Accounting Office (GAO)
, 2004, “
Electricity Markets: Consumers Could Benefit for Demand Response Programs, But Challenges Remain
,” GAO, Jan. 2, http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d04844.pdfhttp://www.gao.gov/new.items/d04844.pdf.
4.
Quantum Consulting Inc. and Summit Blue Consulting, LLC Working Group 2
, 2005, “
Demand Response Program Evaluation—Final Report
,” Prepared for Working Group 2 Measurement and Evaluation Committee and Southern California Edison Company, Apr. 28, California Energy Commission, Jan. 2.
5.
Piette
,
M. A.
,
Sezgen
,
O.
,
Watson
,
D. S.
,
Motegi
,
N.
, and
Shockman
,
C.
, 2005, “
Development and Evaluation of Fully Automated Demand Response in Large Facilities
,” Report Nos. CEC-500-2005-013 and LBNL-55085.
6.
Piette
,
M. A.
,
Watson
,
D. S.
,
Motegi
,
N.
,
Bourassa
,
N.
, and
Shockman
,
C.
, 2005, “
Findings From the 2004 Fully Automated Demand Response Tests in Large Facilities
,” Report Nos. CEC-500-03-026 and LBNL-58178.
7.
Piette
,
M. A.
,
Watson
,
D.
,
Motegi
,
N.
,
Kiliccote
,
S.
, and
Xu
,
P.
, 2006, “
Automated Critical Peak Pricing Field Tests: Program Description and Results
,” Report to the Pacific Gas and Electric Company Emerging Technologies Program and California Institute for Energy and the Environment, Report No. LBNL-59351.
8.
Piette
,
M. A.
,
Watson
,
D.
,
Motegi
,
N.
, and
Kiliccote
,
S.
, 2007, “
Automated Critical Peak Pricing Field Tests: 2006 Pilot Program Description and Results
,” Report No. LBNL-62218.
9.
Spees
,
K.
, and
Lave
,
L. B.
, 2007, “
Demand Response and Electricity Market Efficiency
,”
Electr. J.
1040-6190,
20
(
3
), pp.
69
85
.
10.
Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) IntelliGrid Consortium
, “
The IntelliGrid Consortium: Leading the Drive to Transform the Power Delivery System
,” EPRI, Jan. 2, http://www.epri.com/IntelliGrid/http://www.epri.com/IntelliGrid/.
11.
Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards (OASIS) Consortium
, “
About OASIS
,” OASIS, Jan. 2, http://www.oasis-open.org/who/http://www.oasis-open.org/who/.
12.
Gridwise Architecture Council (GWAC)
, 2008, Jan. 2, http://www.gridwiseac.org/http://www.gridwiseac.org/.
13.
Communication Networks and Systems in Substations
, 2008, International Electro-Technical Commission (IEC) 61850 Standard, Pt. 1–10, May 25, http://www.iec.ch/http://www.iec.ch/ and http://tissues.iec61850.com/parts.mspxhttp://tissues.iec61850.com/parts.mspx.
14.
Common Information Model (CIM) Standards, Distributed Management Task Force, Inc. (DTMF)
, 2008, May 25, http://www.dmtf.org/standards/cim/http://www.dmtf.org/standards/cim/.
15.
Motegi
,
N.
,
Piette
,
M. A.
,
Kinney
,
S.
, and
Herter
,
K.
, 2003, “
Web-Based Energy Information Systems for Energy Management and Demand Response in Commercial Building
,” Report No. LBNL-52510.
16.
California Energy Commission (CEC)
, 2002, “
Technical Options Guidebook: Enhanced Automation
,” CEC, Jan. 2, http://www.energy.ca.gov/enhancedautomation/documents/400-02-005F_TECH_OPTIONS.PDFhttp://www.energy.ca.gov/enhancedautomation/documents/400-02-005F_TECH_OPTIONS.PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.