Abstract

Process uncertainty can have negative effects on part quality and is, therefore, critical to the safety and performance of products. Those effects are manifested in the dimensional measurement uncertainty associated with those parts and products. To minimize the effects of process uncertainties, the sources of dimensional uncertainty must be identified and clearly communicated to collaborators and suppliers. A principal source of dimensional uncertainty is the measurement equipment itself. This article presents an activity model, rule types, and sample rules for selecting dimensional metrology equipment. The activity model represents key operations and information flows associated with the dimensional measurement. Analysis of the included activity model facilitates the development of rule types for measurement equipment selection as described in the Quality Information Framework (QIF) standard. Rule types are based on design information and measurement requirements. Standard rule types enable industrial metrologists to capture, exchange, and share equipment selection rules with their collaborators. Example QIF rules are defined for successful and cost-saving use in planning a measurement process with functionally complex and appropriate dimensional measurement equipment.

References

1.
QIF,
2019
, “
ANSI/QIF Version 3.0
,” http://qifstandards.org
2.
Morse
,
E.
,
Heysiattablab
,
S.
,
Barnard-Feeney
,
A.
, and
Hedberg
,
T.
, Jr.
,
2016
, “
Interoperability: Linking Design and Tolerancing With Metrology
,”
14th CIRP Conference on Computer Aided Tolerancing Procedia CIRP
, Vol. 43, pp.
13
16
.
3.
ISO 22093
,
2011
, “
Industrial Automation Systems and Integration—Physical Device Control—Dimensional Measuring Interface Standard (DMIS)
.” .
4.
ISO 17450-1
,
2011
, “
Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)—General Concepts—Part 1: Model for Geometrical Specification and Verification, International Organization for Standardization
.”
5.
ISO 25378
,
2009
, “
Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)—Characteristics and Conditions—Definitions, International Organization for Standardization
.”
6.
ANSI/ASME Dimensioning and Tolerancing
.”
7.
ISO 1101
,
2011
, “
Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)—Geometrical Tolerancing—Tolerances of Form, Orientation, Location and Run-Out, International Organization for Standardization
.”
8.
ISO 17450-3
,
2016
, “
Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)—General Concepts—Part 3: Toleranced Features, International Organization for Standardization
.”
9.
ISO 5459
,
2011
, “
Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)—Geometrical Tolerancing—Datums and Datum Systems, International Organization for Standardization
.”
10.
ISO 14638
,
2015
, “
Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)—Matrix Model, International Organization for Standardization
.”
11.
Sladek
,
J.
,
2016
,
Coordinate Metrology
,
Springer-Verlag
,
Berlin
.
12.
Hocken
,
R.
, and
Pereira
,
P.
,
2012
,
Coordinate Measuring Machines and Systems
, 2nd ed.,
CRC Press
,
New York
.
13.
Down
,
M.
,
Czubak
,
F.
,
Gruska
,
G.
,
Stahley
,
S.
, and
Benham
,
D.
,
2010
,
Measurement Systems Analysis—Reference Manual
, 4th ed.,
Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG)
,
Troy, MI
.
14.
Vafaeesefat
,
A.
, and
Elmaraghy
,
H.
,
2000
, “
Automated Accessibility Analysis and Measurement Clustering for CMMs
,”
Int. J. Prod. Res.
,
38
(
10
), pp.
2215
2231
.
15.
Muelaner
,
J.
,
Cai
,
B.
, and
Maropoulos
,
P.
,
2010
, “
Large-Volume Metrology Instrument Selection and Measurability Analysis
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. B
,
224
(
6
), pp.
853
868
.
16.
Toteva
,
P.
,
Vasileva
,
D.
, and
Mihaylova
,
N.
,
2014
, “
Methods for Selection of Measuring Instruments
,”
Appl. Mech. Mater.
,
657
, pp.
1006
1010
.
17.
Flack
,
D.
,
2014
, “CMM Measurement Strategies,”
Measurement Good Practice Guide No. 41
, Issue 2,
National Physical Laboratory
,
Middlesex, UK.
18.
Lockheed Martin Engineering
,
2010
, “
Inspection and Acceptance Criteria for a Model Centric Design Environment
,” 100-46, Rev. 2.0, Lockheed Martin Corporation.
19.
The Coordinate Metrology Society
,
2016
,
Strategic Planning for Coordinate Metrology
, version 1,
NPL Management Limited
,
Middlesex, UK.
20.
Rolls-Royce,
2015
, “
Guide to Dimensional Measurement Equipment, Report MXG001, Version 3.3
.”
21.
Trainer
,
A.
,
Hedberg
,
T.
, Jr.
,
Barnard Feeney
,
A.
,
Fischer
,
K.
, and
Rosche
,
P.
,
2016
, “
Gaps Analysis of Integrating Product Design, Manufacturing, and Quality Data in the Supply Chain Using Model-Based Definition
,”
Proceedings of the 2016 Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference
,
Blacksburg VA
, Paper No. MSEC2016-8792.
22.
ISO 8015 Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)—Fundamentals—Concepts, Principles, and Rules, International Organization for Standardization
,
2011
.
23.
ASME B89.7.2
,
2014
,
Dimensional Measurement Planning
,
American Society of Mechanical Engineers
,
New York
.
24.
ASME B89.7.3.2
,
2007
,
Guidelines for the Evaluation of Dimensional Measurement Uncertainty
,
American Society of Mechanical Engineers
,
New York
.
25.
International Organization for Standardization
,
2012
, “
ISO 22514-7:2012 Statistical Methods in Process Management—Capability and Performance—Part 7: Capability of Measurement Processes
.”
26.
ANSI/ASME B89.4.22 Methods for Performance Evaluation of Articulated Arm Coordinate Measuring Machines, 2004 (Reaffirmed 2014)
.
27.
ANSI/ASME B89.4.10360.2 Acceptance Test and Reverification Test for Coordinate Measuring Machines (CMMs)—Part 2: CMMs Used for Measuring Linear Dimensions
,
2008
.
28.
ISO 10360-1 Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)—Acceptance and Reverification Tests for Coordinate Measuring Machines (CMMs)—Part 1: Vocabulary, International Organization for Standardization
,
2000
.
29.
ISO 14978 Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)—General Concepts and Requirements for GPS Measuring Equipment, International Organization for Standardization
,
2006
.
30.
ISO 17450-2 Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)—General Concepts—Part 2: Basic Tenets, Specifications, Operators, Uncertainties, and Ambiguities, International Organization for Standardization
,
2012
.
31.
ISO 14253-1 Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)—Inspection by Measurement of Workpieces and Measuring Equipment—Part 1: Decision Rules for Proving Conformity or Nonconformity With Specifications, International Organization for Standardization
,
2013
.
32.
ISO 14253-2 Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)—Inspection by Measurement of Workpieces and Measuring Equipment—Part 2: Guidance for the Estimation of Uncertainty in GPS Measurements, in Calibration of Measuring Equipment and in Product Verification, International Organization for Standardization
,
2011
.
33.
ISO 14253-3 Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)—Inspection by Measurement of Workpieces and Measuring Equipment—Part 3: Guidance for Achieving Agreements on Measurement Uncertainty Statements, International Organization for Standardization
,
2010
.
34.
ISO 14253-4 Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)—Inspection by Measurement of Workpieces and Measuring Equipment—Part 4: Background on Functional Limits and Specification Limits in Decision Rules, International Organization for Standardization
,
2011
.
35.
ISO 14253-5 Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)—Inspection by Measurement of Workpieces and Measuring Equipment—Part 5: Uncertainty in Verification Testing of Indicating Measuring Instruments, International Organization for Standardization
,
2015
.
36.
ISO 14253-6 Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)—Inspection by Measurement of Workpieces and Measuring Equipment—Part 6: Generalizing Decision Rules for the Acceptance and Rejection of Instruments and Workpieces, International Organization for Standardization
,
2012
.
37.
JCGM 100:2008, Evaluation of Measurement Data—Guide to the Expression, Bureau International des Poids et Measures (www.bipm.org), Sevres, France
,
2008
.
38.
JCGM 106:2012, Evaluation of Measurement Data—The Role of Measurement Uncertainty in Measurement Conformity Assessment, Bureau International des Poids et Measures (www.bipm.org), Sevres, France
,
2012
.
39.
ISO/IEC/IEEE 31320-1:2012, Information technology—Modeling Languages—Part 1: Syntax and Semantics for IDEF0
.
You do not currently have access to this content.