Abstract

Sit-to-stand (STS) is a challenging task, especially for injured elderly in their daily life. This paper presents Part 2 of the assisted spatial STS computational motion prediction to investigate the effect of a unilateral grab-rail bar placed on the right-hand side on STS motion performance for injured virtual individuals (computational digital human model-DHM) with either right or left knee injury. The motion prediction formulation was constructed as a nonlinear optimization and validated in Part 1 of the assisted spatial STS motion prediction (Yang, J., and Ozsoy, B., 2021, “Assisted Spatial Sit-to-Stand Prediction—Part 1: VirtualHealthy Elderly Individuals,” ASME J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng., 21(4), p. 041002). Injuries are implemented into the formulation with reduction rates of 75% in a single knee‘s extension torque limits. Two different objective functions are tested: The first one is just minimizing the dynamic effort where the second one is minimizing the difference between right and left side support reaction forces in addition to the dynamic effort. Computational simulations resulted in that systematic changes are seen in the joint coordination better with the first objective function for the elderly group with either right or left knee injury. Since only one of the knees is modeled to experience a strength loss, virtual-individuals tend to flex their trunk to the intact side whilst rotating the upper-body to the right side with both objective functions due to holding the grab-rail bar, which was placed to the right side of the biomechanical model. Based on the peak values of the center of mass velocity and displacement profiles in both the medial-lateral axis, virtual-individuals prefer to use lateral plane motions less and transverse plane motions more to minimize the difference between right and left side-vertical support reaction forces with the second objective function.

References

1.
Guralnik
,
J. M.
,
Ferrucci
,
L.
,
Simonsick
,
E. M.
,
Salive
,
M. E.
, and
Wallace
,
R. B.
,
1995
, “
Lower- Extremity Function in Persons Over the Age of 70 Years as a Predictor of Subsequent Disability
,”
N. Engl. J. Med.
,
332
(
9
), pp.
556
561
.
2.
Yang
,
J.
, and
Ozsoy
,
B.
,
2019
, “
Three Dimensional Unassisted Sit-to-Stand Prediction for Virtual Healthy Young and Elderly Individuals
,”
Multibody Syst. Dyn.
,
49
(
1
), pp.
33
52
.
3.
Yang
,
J.
, and
Ozsoy
,
B.
,
2021
, “
Assisted Spatial Sit-to-Stand Prediction—Part 1: Virtual Healthy Elderly Individuals
,”
ASME J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng.
,
21
(
4
), p.
041002
.
4.
Schultz
,
A. B.
,
Alexander
,
N. B.
, and
Ashton-Miller
,
J. A.
,
1992
, “
Biomechanical Analyses of Rising From a Chair
,”
J. Biomech.
,
25
(
12
), pp.
1383
1391
.
5.
O’Meara
,
D. M.
, and
Smith
,
R. M.
,
2006
, “
The Effects of Unilateral Grab Rail Assistance on the Sit-to-Stand Performance of Older Aged Adults
,”
Hum. Mov. Sci.
,
25
(
2
), pp.
257
274
.
6.
Sekiguchi
,
Y.
,
Honda
,
K.
,
Phakdepiboon
,
T.
,
Jinde
,
M.
,
Kato
,
T.
,
Kanetaka
,
H.
, and
Izumi
,
S.
,
2020
, “
Effects of Shelf Bar Assistance on Kinetic Control During Sit-to-Stand in Healthy Young and Elderly Subjects
,”
J. Biomech.
,
106
, p.
109822
.
7.
Kinoshita
,
S.
,
2012
, “
Handrail Position and Shape That Best Facilitate Sit-to-Stand Movement
,”
J. Back Musculoskeletal Rehabil.
,
25
(
1
), pp.
33
45
.
8.
Kinoshita
,
S.
,
Kiyama
,
R.
, and
Yoshimoto
,
Y.
,
2015
, “
Effect of Handrail Height on Sit-To-Stand Movement
,”
PLoS One
,
10
(
7
), p.
e0133747
.
9.
Komisar
,
V.
,
2018
, “
Effect of Handrail Height on Balance Recovery Reactions in Younger and Older Adults
,”
PhD. diss.
,
University of Toronto
.
10.
Lee
,
S. J.
,
Mehta-Desai
,
R.
,
Oh
,
K.
,
Sanford
,
J.
, and
Prilutsky
,
B. I.
,
2019
, “
Effects of Bilateral Swing-Away Grab Bars on the Biomechanics of Stand-to-Sit and Sit-to-Stand Toilet Transfers
,”
Disabil. Rehabil. Assist. Technol.
,
14
(
3
), pp.
292
300
. Epub 2018 Mar 9. PMID: 29522366.
11.
Chihara
,
T.
,
Fukuchi
,
N.
, and
Seo
,
A.
,
2015
, “
Optimum Position and Orientation of Handrail for Sit-to-Stand Movement
,”
J. Adv. Mech. Des. Syst. Manuf.
,
9
(
3
), pp.
1
13
.
12.
Dekker
,
D.
,
Buzink
,
S. N.
,
Molenbroek
,
J. F. M.
, and
de Bruin
,
R.
,
2007
, “
Hand Supports to Assist Toilet Use Among the Elderly
,”
Appl. Ergon.
,
38
(
1
), pp.
109
118
.
13.
Kato
,
T.
,
Sekiguchi
,
Y.
,
Honda
,
K.
,
Izumi
,
S.-I.
, and
Kanetaka
,
H.
,
2020 Jul 25
, “
Comparison of Handrail Reaction Forces Between Two Different Handrails During Sit-to-Stand Movement in the Elderly
,”
Clin. Biomech.
,
80
, p.
105130
.
14.
Gordon
,
C. C.
,
Churchill
,
T.
,
Clauser
,
C. E.
,
Bradtmiller
,
B.
,
McConville
,
J. T.
,
Tebbetts
,
I.
, and
Walker
,
R. A.
,
1988
, “
Anthropometric Survey of U.S. Army Personnel: Methods and Summary Statistics
,” Final report NATICK/TR-89/027, U.S. Army Natick Research, Development and Engineering Center, Natick, MA.
15.
McConville
,
J.
,
Clauser
,
C.
, and
Churchill
,
T.
,
1980
,
Anthropometric Relationships of Body and Body Segment Moments of Inertia
,
Anthropology Research Project Inc.
,
Yellow Springs, OH
.
16.
Lord
,
S. R.
,
Murray
,
S. M.
,
Chapman
,
K.
,
Munro
,
B.
, and
Tiedemann
,
A.
,
2002
, “
Sit-to-Stand Performance Depends on Sensation, Speed, Balance, and Psychological Status in Addition to Strength in Older People
,”
J. Gerontol. A. Biol. Sci. Med. Sci.
,
57
(
8
), pp.
M539
M543
.
You do not currently have access to this content.