To evaluate the opportunities and extent to which open standards can be used in or enhanced for product lifecycle management frameworks, we have developed three metrics, namely, compatibility, completeness, and coverage, for assessing the degree-of-openness of engineering information. A simple test case shows that each of the three metrics provides a certain type of assessment of the degree-of-openness.

1.
Giarratano
,
J.
, and
Riley
,
G.
, 1998,
Expert System
,
3rd ed.
,
PWS
,
New York
.
2.
Schenck
,
S.
, and
Wilson
,
P.
, 1994,
Information Modeling: The EXPRESS Way
,
Oxford University Press
,
New York
.
3.
Kemmerer
,
S. J.
, ed., 1999,
STEP: The Grand Experience
,
NIST Special Publication
No. 939,
Gaithersburg
.
4.
Bernstein
,
P. A.
,
Melnik
,
S.
,
Quix
,
C.
, and
Petropoulos
,
M.
, 2004, “
Industrial-Strength Schema Matching
,”
ACM SIGMOD Rec.
,
33
, pp.
38
43
.
5.
Spyns
,
P.
,
Meersman
,
R.
, and
Jarrar
,
M.
, 2002, “
Data Modelling Versus Ontology Engineering
,”
SIGMOD Rec.
,
31
, pp.
12
17
.
6.
Plotkin
,
G. D.
, 2004, “
The Origins of Structural Operational Semantics
,”
J. Log. Algebraic Program.
,
60-61
, pp.
3
15
.
You do not currently have access to this content.