In many cases, the design of a tracking controller can be significantly simplified by the use of a 2-degrees of freedom (DOF) control structure, including a feedforward control (i.e., the inversion of the nominal system dynamics). Unfortunately, the computation of this feedforward control is not easy if the system is nonminimum-phase. Important examples of such systems are flexible multibody systems, such as lightweight manipulators. There are several approaches to the numerical computation of the exact inversion of a flexible multibody system. In this paper, the singularly perturbed form of such mechanical systems is used to give a semianalytic solution to the tracking control design. The control makes the end-effector to even though not exactly, but approximately track a certain trajectory. Thereby, the control signal is computed as a series expansion in terms of an overall flexibility of the bodies of the multibody system. Due to the use of symbolic computations, the main calculations are independent of given parameters (e.g., the desired trajectories), such that the feedforward control can be calculated online. The effectiveness of this approach is shown by the simulation of a two-link flexible manipulator.

References

1.
Devasia
,
S.
,
Chen
,
D.
, and
Paden
,
B.
,
1996
, “
Nonlinear Inversion-Based Output Tracking
,”
IEEE Trans. Autom. Control
,
41
(
7
), pp.
930
942
.10.1109/9.508898
2.
Seifried
,
R.
,
Burkhardt
,
B.
, and
Held
,
A.
,
2013
, “
Trajectory Control of Serial and Parallel Flexible Manipulators Using Model Inversion
,”
Multibody Dynamics: Computational Methods and Applications
,
J. C.
Samin
and
P.
Fisette
, eds.,
Springer
,
New York
.
3.
Seifried
,
R.
,
Held
,
A.
, and
Dietmann
,
F.
,
2011
, “
Analysis of Feed-Forward Control Design Approaches for Flexible Multibody Systems
,”
J. Syst. Des. Dyn.
,
41
, pp.
429
440
.10.1299/jsdd.5.429
4.
Blajer
,
W.
, and
Kolodziejczyk
,
K.
,
2004
, “
A Geometric Approach to Solving Problems of Control Constraints: Theory and a DAE Framework
,”
Multibody Syst. Dyn.
,
11
, pp.
343
364
.10.1023/B:MUBO.0000040800.40045.51
5.
Weber
,
S.
, and
Arnold
,
M.
,
2011
, “
Methods From Singular Perturbation Theory Applied to Flexible Multibody Systems
,”
Proceedings of Multibody Dynamics 2011 (ECCOMAS Thematic Conference)
, J. C. Samin and P. Fisette, eds.
6.
Siciliano
,
B.
, and
Book
,
W. J.
,
1989
, “
A Singular Perturbation Approach to Control of Lightweight Flexible Manipulators
,”
J. Syst. Des. Dyn.
,
7
(
4
), pp.
70
90
.10.1177/027836498800700404
7.
Spong
,
M.
,
Khorasani
,
K.
, and
Kokotović
,
P. V.
,
1987
, “
An Integral Manifold Approach to the Feedback Control of Flexible Joint Robots
,”
IEEE J. Rob. Autom.
,
Ra-3
(
4
), pp.
291
300
.10.1109/JRA.1987.1087102
8.
Vakil
,
M.
,
Fotouhi
,
R.
, and
Nikiforuk
,
P. N.
,
2011
, “
Trajectory Tracking for the End-Effector of a Class of Flexible Link Manipulators
,”
J. Vib. Control
,
17
(
1
), pp.
55
68
.10.1177/1077546309350554
9.
Moallem
,
M.
,
Khorasani
,
K.
, and
Patel
,
R. V.
,
1997
, “
An Integral Manifold Approach for Tip-Position Tracking of Flexible Multi-Link Manipulators
,”
IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom.
,
13
(
6
), pp.
823
837
.10.1109/70.650161
10.
Kokotović
,
P. V.
, and
Khalil
,
H. K.
,
1986
,
Singular Perturbation Methods in Control
,
Academic
,
London
.
11.
Ghorbel
,
F.
, and
Spong
,
M. W.
,
2000
, “
Integral Manifolds of Singularly Perturbed Systems With Application to Rigid-Link Flexible-Joint Multibody Systems
,”
Int. J. Non-Linear Mech.
,
35
, pp.
133
155
.10.1016/S0020-7462(98)00092-4
12.
Sobolev
,
V.
,
2005
, “
Geometry of Singular Perturbations: Critical Cases
,”
Singular Perturbations and Hysteresis
,
M.
Mortell
,
R.
O'Malley
,
A.
Pokrovskii
, and
V.
Sobolev
, eds.,
SIAM
,
Philadelphia
, PA., pp.
153
206
.
13.
Nipp
,
K.
,
1992
, “
Smooth Attractive Invariant Manifolds of Singularly Perturbed ODE's
,” ETH Zurich Research Report No. 92-13.
14.
Shabana
,
A.
,
2005
,
Dynamics of Multibody Systems
,
Cambridge University
,
Cambridge, England
.
15.
Fehr
,
J.
,
2011
, “
Automated and Error Controlled Model Reduction in Elastic Multibody Systems
,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Stuttgart, Shaker, Germany.
16.
Kurz
,
T.
,
Eberhard
,
P.
,
Henninger
,
C.
, and
Schiehlen
,
W.
,
2010
, “
From Neweul to Neweul-M2
,”
Multibody Syst. Dyn.
,
24
, pp.
25
41
.10.1007/s11044-010-9187-x
You do not currently have access to this content.