In order to investigate the derailment mechanism and safety operation area of high-speed trains under earthquake, a coupled vehicle-track dynamic model considering earthquake effect is developed, in which the vehicle is modeled as a 35 degrees of freedom (DOF) multibody system with nonlinear suspension characteristic and the slab track is modeled as a discrete elastic support model. The rails of the track are assumed to be Timoshenko beams supported by discrete rail fasteners, and the slabs are modeled with solid finite elements. The system motion equations are solved by means of an explicit integration method in time domain. The present work analyzes in detail the effect of earthquake characteristics on the dynamical behaviors of a vehicle-track coupling system and the transient derailment criteria. The considered derailment criteria include the ratio of the wheel/rail lateral force to the vertical force, the wheel loading reduction, the wheel/rail contact point traces on the wheel tread, and the wheel rise with respect to the rail top, respectively. The present work also finds the safety operation area, the derailment area, and the warning area of high-speed trains under earthquake, and their boundaries. These areas consist of three key parameters influencing the dynamical behavior of high-speed train and track under earthquake. The three key influencing parameters are, respectively, the vehicle speed and the lateral and vertical peak ground acceleration (PGA) of an earthquake. The results obtained indicate that the lateral earthquake motion has a greater influence on the vehicle dynamic behavior and its running safety compared to the vertical earthquake motion. The risk of derailment increases quickly with the increasing of lateral earthquake motion amplitude. The lateral earthquake motion is dominant in the vehicle running safety influenced by an earthquake. While the vertical earthquake motion promotes jumping of the wheels easily, not easy is flange climb derailment. And the effect of the vehicle speed is not significant under earthquake.

References

References
1.
Nagase
,
K.
,
Kondo
,
K.
, and
Nomura
,
T.
, 1997, “
Train Damaged by the Quake in Kobe
,”
JSME Int. J. C-Mech. S. Y.
,
63
(
606
), pp.
620
627
.
2.
Nishimura
,
K.
,
Terumichi
,
Y.
, and
Morimura
,
T.
, 2009, “
Development of Vehicle Dynamics Simulation for Safety Analyses of Rail Vehicles on Excited Tracks
,”
J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn.
,
48
(
3
), pp.
129
135
.
3.
Miyamoto
,
T.
,
Ishida
,
H.
, and
Matsuo
,
M.
, 1997, “
Running Safety of Railway Vehicle as Earthquake Occurs
,”
Q. RTRI
,
38
(
3
), pp.
117
122
.
4.
Railway Technical Research Institute, 1999, “
Design Standard for Railway Structures (Seismic Designs)
,”
Maruzen
, pp.
117
122
.
5.
Miyamoto
,
T.
,
Matsumoto
,
N.
,
Sogabe
,
M.
,
Shimomura
,
T.
,
Nishiyama
,
Y.
, and
Matsuo
,
M.
, 2007, “
Full-Scale Experiment on the Dynamic Behaviour of Railway Vehicles Against Heavy Track Vibration
,”
J. Environ. Eng.
,
2
(
2
), pp.
419
428
.
6.
Tanabe
,
M.
,
Matsumoto
,
N.
,
Wakui
,
H.
,
Sogabe
,
M.
,
Okuda
,
H.
, and
Tanabe
,
Y.
, 2008, “
A Simple and Efficient Numerical Method for Dynamic Interaction Analysis of a High-Speed Train and Railway Structure During an Earthquake
,”
J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn.
,
3
(
2
), pp.
1
8
.
7.
Wu
,
Y.
, 2000, “
Dynamic Interactions of Train-Rail-Bridge System Under Normal and Seismic Conditions
,” Ph.D. thesis, National Taiwan University, China.
8.
Yang
,
Y.
, and
Wu
,
Y.
, 2002, “
Dynamic Stability of Trains Moving Over Bridges Shaken By Earthquakes
,”
J. Sound Vib.
,
258
(
1
), pp.
65
94
.
9.
Yau
,
J.
, and
Fryba
,
L.
, 2007, “
Response of Suspended Beams Due to Moving Loads and Vertical Seismic Ground Excitations
,”
Eng. Struct.
,
29
(
12
), pp.
3255
3262
.
10.
Xia
,
H.
,
Han
,
Y.
,
Zhang
,
N.
, and
Guo
,
W.
, 2009, “
Dynamic Analysis of Train-Bridge System Subjected to Non-Uniform Seismic Excitations
,”
Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn.
,
35
(
12
), pp.
1563
1579
.
11.
Luo
,
X.
, 2005, “
Study on Methodology for Running Safety Assessment of Trains in Seismic Design of Railway Structures
,”
Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng.
,
25
(
1
), pp.
79
91
.
12.
Yang
,
J.
,
Li
,
J.
, and
Lin
,
G.
, 2006, “
A Simple Approach to Integration of Acceleration Data for Dynamic Soil-Structure Interaction Analysis
,”
Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng.
,
26
(
3
), pp.
725
734
.
13.
Xiao
,
X. B.
,
Jin
,
X. S.
,
Deng
,
Y. Q.
, and
Zhou
,
Z. R.
, 2008, “
Effect of Curved Track Support Failure on Vehicle Derailment
,”
Veh. Syst. Dyn.
,
46
(
11
), pp.
1029
1059
.
14.
Clough
,
R.
, and
Penzien
,
J.
, 2003,
Dynamics of Structures
,
3rd ed.
,
Computers & Structures Inc.
, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
15.
Jin
,
X.
,
Wen
,
Z.
,
Zhang
,
W.
, and
Shen
,
Z.
, 2005, “
Numerical Simulation of Rail Corrugation on Curved Track
,”
Comput. Struct.
,
83
, pp.
2052
2065
.
16.
Jin
,
X.
, and
Wen
,
Z.
, 2007, “
Rail Corrugation Formation Studied With a Full-Scale Test Facility and Numerical Analysis
,”
Proc. IMechE Part J
,
221
, pp.
675
698
.
17.
Xiao
,
X. B.
,
Jin
,
X. S.
,
Wen
,
Z. F.
,
Zhu
,
M. H.
, and
Zhang
,
W. H.
, 2011, “
Effect of Tangent Track Buckle on Vehicle Derailment
,”
Multi-Body Dyn.
,
25
(
1
), pp.
1
41
.
18.
Kalker
,
J. J.
, 1990,
Three-Dimensional Elastic Bodies in Rolling Contact
,
Kluwer Academic
,
Amsterdam
.
19.
Shen
,
Z. Y.
,
Hedrick
,
J. K.
, and
Elkins
,
J. A.
, 1984, “
A Comparison of Alternative Creep-Force Models for Rail Vehicle Dynamic Analysis
,”
Proceedings of the Eighth IAVSD Symposium
,
Cambridge, MA
, pp.
591
605
.
20.
Kalker
,
J. J.
, 1967, “
On the Rolling Contact of Two Elastic Bodies in the Presence of Dry Friction
,” Ph.D. thesis, Delft University, The Netherlands.
21.
Knothe
,
K.
, and
Grassie
,
S. L.
, 1993, “
Modeling of Railway Track and Vehicle/Track Interaction at High Frequencies
,”
Veh. Syst. Dyn.
,
22
(
3
), pp.
209
262
.
22.
Xiao
,
X. B.
,
Jin
,
X. S.
, and
Wen
,
Z. F.
, 2007, “
Effect of Disabled Fastening Systems and Ballast on Vehicle Derailment
,”
ASME J. Vib. Acoust.
,
129
(
2
), pp.
217
229
.
23.
Zhai
,
W. M.
, 1996, “
Two Simple Fast Integration Methods for Large-Scale Dynamic Problems in Engineering
,”
Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng.
,
39
(
24
), pp.
4199
4214
.
24.
http://www.vibrationdata.com/elcentro.htm.
25.
Nadal
,
M. J.
, 1896 ,“
Theorie de la Stabilite des Locomotives, Part II: Mouvement de Lacet
,”
Ann. Mines
,
10
, pp.
232
255
.
26.
Wu
,
H. M.
, 2000, “
Investigation of Wheel Rail Interaction on Wheel Flange Climb Derailment and Wheel Rail Profile Compatibility
,” Ph.D. thesis, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL.
27.
Weinstock
,
H.
, 1984, “
Wheel Climb Derailment Criteria for Evaluation of Rail Vehicle Safety
,”
Proceedings of the ASME Winter Annual Meeting, 84 and WA/RT-1
, pp.
1
7
.
28.
Matsudaira
,
T.
, 1963, “
Dynamics of High Speed Rolling Stock
,”
Q. RTRI, The Special Issue
.
7
(
1
), pp.
45
97
.
29.
M1001, AAR Mechanical Division, 1993, “
Manual of Standards and Recommended Practices
,” Section c-Part II, Vol.
1
, Chap. XI, Section 11.5.2, Track-worthiness Criteria, Adopted 1987, Revised 1993.
30.
Wilson
,
N.
,
Shu
,
X. G.
,
Wu
,
H. M.
, and
Tunna
,
J.
, 2004, “
Distance-Based Flange Climb L/V Criteria
,” Association of American Railroads/Transportation Technology Center, Institute of Technology Digest, TD-04-012.
31.
China Standards, 1985, “
GB/T 5599-85 Railway Vehicles-Specification for Evaluation the Dynamic Performance and Accreditation Test
.”
32.
Miyamoto
,
M.
, 1996, “
Mechanism of Derailment Phenomena of Railway Vehicles
,”
Q. RTRI
,
37
(
3
), pp.
147
155
.
33.
Xiang
,
J.
,
Zeng
,
Q. Y.
, and
Lou
,
P.
, 2004, “
Transverse Vibration of Train-Bridge and Train-Track Time Varying System and the Theory of Random Energy Analysis for Train Derailment
,”
Veh. Syst. Dyn.
,
41
(
2
), pp.
129
155
.
You do not currently have access to this content.