In this investigation, a new three-dimensional nonlinear train car coupler model that takes into account the geometric nonlinearity due to the coupler and car body displacements is developed. The proposed nonlinear coupler model allows for arbitrary three-dimensional motion of the car bodies and captures kinematic degrees of freedom that are not captured using existing simpler models. The coupler kinematic equations are expressed in terms of the car body coordinates, as well as the relative coordinates of the coupler with respect to the car body. The virtual work is used to obtain expressions for the generalized forces associated with the car body and coupler coordinates. By assuming the inertia of the coupler components negligible compared to the inertia of the car body, the system coordinates are partitioned into two distinct sets: inertial and noninertial coordinates. The inertial coordinates that describe the car motion have inertia forces associated with them. The noninertial coupler coordinates; on the other hand, describe the coupler kinematics and have no inertia forces associated with them. The use of the principle of virtual work leads to a coupled system of differential and algebraic equations expressed in terms of the inertial and noninertial coordinates. The differential equations, which depend on the coupler noninertial coordinates, govern the motion of the train cars; whereas the algebraic force equations are the result of the quasi-static equilibrium conditions of the massless coupler components. Given the inertial coordinates and velocities, the quasi-static coupler algebraic force equations are solved iteratively for the noninertial coordinates using a Newton–Raphson algorithm. This approach leads to significant reduction in the numbers of state equations, system inertial coordinates, and constraint equations; and allows avoiding a system of stiff differential equations that can arise because of the relatively small coupler mass. The use of the concept of the noninertial coordinates and the resulting differential/algebraic equations obtained in this study is demonstrated using the knuckle coupler, which is widely used in North America. Numerical results of simple train models are presented in order to demonstrate the use of the formulation developed in this paper.

References

References
1.
Cole
,
C.
, and
Sun
,
Y.Q.
, 2006,
“Simulated Comparisons of Wagon Coupler Systems in Heavy Haul Trains,”
IMechE J. Rail Rapid Transit
,
220
, pp.
247
256
.
2.
Durali
,
M.
, and
Shadmehri
,
B.
, 2003,
“Nonlinear Analysis of Train Derailment in Severe Braking,”
ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control
,
125
, pp.
48
53
.
3.
Duncan
,
I. B.
, and
Webb
,
P.A.
, 1989, “
The Longitudinal Behavior of Heavy Haul Trains using Remote Locomotives
,”
Proceedings of the Fourth International Heavy Haul Railway Conference
,
Brisbane, Australia
, pp.
587
590
.
4.
El-Sibaie
,
M.
, 1993, “
Recent Advancements in Buff and Draft Testing Techniques
,”
Proceedings of the IEEE/ASME Joint Rail Conference
, pp.
115
119
.
5.
Bentley
,
P. H.
, 1993,
“Development and Application of Auto-Coupler Systems for a Steelworks 1988-92,”
IMechE Proc., Part F: J. Rail and Rapid Transit
,
207
, pp.
115
123
.
6.
Janney
,
E.
, 1873, “
Improvement in car couplings
,” U.S. Patent No. 138,405.
7.
Dawson
,
R.W.
, 1997,
The Car and Locomotive Cyclopedia
,
6th ed.
,
Simmons Boardman Omaha
,
Nebraska
, Sec. 6, pp.
639
703
.
8.
Shabana
,
A. A.
,
Sany
,
J. R.
, 2001, “
An Augmented Formulation for Mechanical System with Non-Generalized Coordinates: Application to Rigid Body Contact Problems
,”
Nonlinear Dynamics
,
Kluwer Academic
,
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
, Vol.
24
, pp.
183
204
.
9.
Shabana
,
A. A.
, 2010,
Computational Dynamics
,
3rd ed.
,
Wiley
,
New York
.
10.
Sanborn
,
G. G.
,
Heineman
,
J. R
,
Shabana
,
A. A.
, 2007, “
A Low Computational Cost Nonlinear Formulation For Multibody Railroad Vehicle Systems
,”
Proceedings of the 2007 ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computer and Information in Engineering Conference
,
Las Vegas, Nevada
, September 4–7.
11.
Sanborn
,
G. G.
,
Heineman
,
J. R.
,
Shabana
,
A. A.
, 2007,
“Implementation of Low Computational Cost Nonlinear Formulation for Multibody Railroad Vehicle Systems,”
Proceedings of the 2007 ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computer and Information in Engineering Conference,
Las Vegas, Nevada
, September 4–7.
12.
Shabana
,
A. A.
,
Zaazaa
,
K. E.
, and
Sugiyama
,
H.
, 2008,
Railroad Vehicle Dynamics: A Computational Approach
,
Francis & Taylor/RC
,
Boca Raton, FL
.
You do not currently have access to this content.