The objective of this paper is to identify the suitable advance controller among optimized proportional–integral–derivative (O-PID), improved self-tuning fuzzy-PID (ISTF-PID), advanced fuzzy nonadaptive PID (AF-NA-PID), and AF-adaptive PID (AF-A-PID) controllers for speed control of nonlinear hybrid electric vehicle (HEV) system. The conventional PID (C-PID) controller cannot tackle the nonlinear systems effectively and gives a poor tracking and disturbance rejection performance. The performances of HEV with the proposed advance controllers are compared with existing C-PID, STF-PID, and conventional fuzzy PID (C-F-PID) controllers. The proposed controllers are designed to achieve the desired vehicle speed and rejection of disturbance due to road grade with reduced pollution and fuel economy.
Improved Self-Tuning Fuzzy Proportional–Integral–Derivative Versus Fuzzy-Adaptive Proportional–Integral–Derivative for Speed Control of Nonlinear Hybrid Electric Vehicles
Contributed by the Design Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND NONLINEAR DYNAMICS. Manuscript received June 12, 2015; final manuscript received May 16, 2016; published online August 9, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Hiroshi Yabuno.
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Cite Icon Cite
- Search Site
Yadav, A. K., and Gaur, P. (August 9, 2016). "Improved Self-Tuning Fuzzy Proportional–Integral–Derivative Versus Fuzzy-Adaptive Proportional–Integral–Derivative for Speed Control of Nonlinear Hybrid Electric Vehicles." ASME. J. Comput. Nonlinear Dynam. November 2016; 11(6): 061013. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4033685
Download citation file:
- Ris (Zotero)
- Reference Manager