Abstract

The quality of grout becomes more important as many projects utilize precast concrete elements and systems to accelerate the delivery of a project. Also, the use of high-strength grout materials increases to properly connect high-strength concrete members. In the present study, two high-strength, cementitious grout materials were tested for their compressive strength to estimate a coefficient of variation (cv), to investigate effects due to curing condition and initial curing time, and to evaluate the strength ratio between cube and cylinder specimens. The 28-day strength of tested grouts reached more than 62.1 MPa (9,000 psi). The estimated cv was 2.3 %, which was slightly higher than the value of 2.1 % used in ASTM C109, Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars (Using 2-in. or [50 mm] Cube Specimens). Based on the estimated cv, the variability limits of compressive strength in ASTM C109 can be 9.5 % (from 8.7 %) for three cubes and 8.4 % (from 7.6 %) for two cubes. There was not a substantial difference in compressive strength between water-cured and moist-cured cubes. Also, the difference of compressive strength is minimal between cubes initially cured for 24 hours and 48 hours before demolding. The compressive strength ratio of ϕ100 mm × 200 mm cylinder specimens to 50 mm cube specimens was between 0.78 and 0.90 for different test ages. The mean ratio was 0.83. These observations can help engineers and practitioners to use ASTM C109 and ASTM C1107, Standard Specification for Packaged Dry, Hydraulic-Cement Grout (Nonshrink), with more confidence when they test high-strength, cementitious grout materials.

References

1.
Graybeal
B.
,
TechBrief: Material Characterization of Field-Cast Connection Grouts, FHWA-HRT-13-042
(
McLean, VA
:
United States Department of Transportation
,
2013
).
2.
Russell
H. G.
,
Adjacent Precast Concrete Box Beam Bridges: Connection Details, NCHRP Synthesis 393
(
Washington, DC
:
Transportation Research Board
,
2009
).
3.
Swenty
M. K.
and
Graybeal
B. A.
,
Material Characterization of Field-Cast Connection Grouts, FHWA-HRT-13-041
(
McLean, VA
:
United States Department of Transportation
,
2013
).
4.
Haber
Z. B.
and
Graybeal
B. A.
, “
Experimental Evaluation of Prefabricated Deck Panel Connections
,” in
Transportation Research Board 94th Annual Meeting
(
Washington, DC
:
Transportation Research Board
,
2015
),
15
1004
.
5.
Yang
Z.
,
Brown
H.
,
Huddleston
J.
, and
Seger
W.
, “
Performance Evaluation of Rapid-Set Prepackaged Cementitious Materials for Rehabilitation of Surface Distress of Concrete Transportation Structures
,”
PCI Journal
61
, no. 
2
(March–April
2016
):
81
96
, https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.03012016.81.96
6.
French
C. E.
,
Shield
C. K.
,
Klaseus
D.
,
Smith
M.
,
Eriksson
W.
,
Ma
Z. J.
,
Zhu
P.
,
Lewis
S.
, and
Chapman
C. E.
,
Cast-in-Place Concrete Connections for Precast Deck Systems, NCHRP Web-Only Document 173
(
Washington, DC
:
Transportation Research Board
,
2011
).
7.
Fiala
D.
, “
Chapter 55: Packaged, Dry, Cementitious Mixtures
,” in
Significance of Tests and Properties of Concrete and Concrete-Making Materials
, ed.
Lamond
J. F.
and
Pielert
J. H.
(
West Conshohocken, PA
:
ASTM International
,
2006
),
631
636
, https://doi.org/10.1520/STP37773S
8.
Standard Specification for Packaged Dry, Hydraulic-Cement Grout (Nonshrink)
(Superseded), ASTM C1107/C1107M-17 (
West Conshohocken, PA
:
ASTM International
, approved December 1,
2017
), https://doi.org/10.1520/C1107_C1107M-17
9.
Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities
Standard Specifications for Highway Construction
(
Juneau, AK
:
Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities
,
2017
).
10.
New York State Department of Transportation
Standard Specifications (US Customary Units), Volume 4, Section 700
(
Albany, NY
:
New York State Department of Transportation
,
2019
).
11.
Utah Department of Transportation
Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction
(
Taylorsville, UT
:
Utah Department of Transportation
,
2017
).
12.
Texas Department of Transportation
Cementitious Grouts and Mortars for Miscellaneous Applications, DMS-4675
(
Austin, TX
:
Texas Department of Transportation
,
2014
).
13.
Florida Department of Transportation
Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction
(
Tallahassee, FL
:
Florida Department of Transportation
,
2020
).
14.
Matsumoto
E. E.
,
Waggoner
M. C.
,
Sumen
G.
,
Kreger
M. E.
,
Wood
S. L.
, and
Breen
J. E.
,
Development of a Precast Bent Cap System, FHWA/TX-0-1748-2
(
Austin, TX
:
Texas Department of Transportation
,
2001
).
15.
Scholz
D. P.
,
Wallenfelsz
J. A.
,
Lijeron
C.
, and
Roberts-Wollmann
C. L.
,
Recommendations for the Connection between Full-Depth Precast Bridge Deck Panel Systems and Precast I-Beams, FHWA/VTRC 07-CR17
(
Richmond, VA
:
Virginia Department of Transportation
,
2007
).
16.
Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars (Using 2-in. or [50-mm] Cube Specimens)
(Superseded), ASTM C109/C109M-16a (
West Conshohocken, PA
:
ASTM International
, approved March 1,
2016
), https://doi.org/10.1520/C0109_C0109M-16A
17.
Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens
(Superseded), ASTM C39/C39M-18 (
West Conshohocken, PA
:
ASTM International
, approved January 1,
2018
), https://doi.org/10.1520/C0039_C0039M-18
18.
de Murphy
M. L.
,
Kim
J.
,
Sang
Z.
, and
Xiao
C.
,
Determining More Effective Approaches for Grouting Shear Keys of Adjacent Box Beams, FHWA-PA-2010-014-PSU 014
(
Harrisburg, PA
:
Pennsylvania Department of Transportation
,
2010
).
19.
Porter
S. D.
, “
Laboratory Testing of Precast Bridge Deck Panel Transverse Connections for Use in Accelerated Bridge Construction
” (master’s thesis,
Utah State University
,
2009
).
20.
Varga
I. D. l.
and
Graybeal
B. A.
,
Dimensional Stability of Grout-Type Materials Used as Connections for Prefabricated Bridge Elements, FHWA-HRT-16-008
(
McLean, VA
:
Federal Highway Administration
,
2016
).
21.
Brown
O.
, “
Packaged, Dry, Cementitious Mixtures
,” in
Significance of Tests and Properties of Concrete and Concrete-Making Materials
, ed.
Klieger
P.
and
Lamond
J.
(
West Conshohocken, PA
:
ASTM International
,
1994
),
604
610
, https://doi.org/10.1520/STP36456S
22.
Neville
A. M.
,
Properties of Concrete
, 5th ed. (
London
:
Pearson
,
2011
).
23.
De Larrard
F.
,
Belloc
A.
,
Renwez
S.
, and
Boulay
C.
, “
Is the Cube Test Suitable for High Performance Concrete?
,”
Materials and Structures
27
, no. 
10
(December
1994
):
580
583
, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02473126
24.
Graybeal
B.
and
Davis
M.
, “
Cylinder or Cube: Strength Testing of 80 to 200 MPa (11.6 to 29 ksi) Ultra-High-Performance Fiber-Reinforced Concrete
,”
ACI Materials Journal
105
, no. 
6
(November
2008
):
603
609
.
25.
Riedel
P.
,
Leutbecher
T.
,
Piotrowski
S.
, and
Heese
C.
, “
Ratios of Compressive Strengths of Ultra-High-Performance Concrete Specimens of Different Shapes and Sizes
,”
ACI Materials Journal
116
, no. 
6
(November
2019
):
139
149
, https://doi.org/10.14359/51716983
26.
Gulyas
R. J.
,
Wirthlin
G. J.
, and
Champa
J. T.
, “
Evaluation of Keyway Grout Test Methods for Precast Concrete Bridges
,”
PCI Journal
40
, no. 
1
(January–February
1995
):
44
57
, https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.01011995.44.57
27.
Standard Practice for Use of the Terms Precision and Bias in ASTM Test Methods
(Superseded), ASTM E177-14 (
West Conshohocken, PA
:
ASTM International
, approved May 1,
2014
), https://doi.org/10.1520/E0177-14
28.
Standard Practice for Preparing Precision and Bias Statements for Test Methods for Construction Materials
, ASTM C670-15 (
West Conshohocken, PA
:
ASTM International
, approved June 15,
2015
), https://doi.org/10.1520/C0670-15
29.
Harter
H. L.
,
Order Statistics and Their Use in Testing and Estimation
, Vol. 
1
(
Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH
:
Aerospace Research Laboratories
,
1970
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.