Abstract

Wood utility poles are one of the most critical components of U.S. infrastructure. In the Pacific Northwest, Douglas fir is the species of wood predominantly used. Douglas fir has a relatively thin band of treatable sapwood surrounding an impermeable, but only moderately durable, heartwood core that is susceptible to internal decay. Historically, through boring has been the most commonly adopted practice for improving the performance of Douglas fir poles. Despite the inclusion of through boring in national utility standards, questions continue to rise regarding through boring. One important question regarding the process is how close to the edge holes should be drilled. The objective of this study was to assess the effects of through boring edge distance on the flexural strength of Douglas fir poles using a combination of full-scale flexural testing of poles as well as finite element analysis (FEA). Full-scale testing of 48 utility poles revealed that drilling holes within 50 or 75 mm of the outer edge of a pole had no significant effect on flexural properties. FEA consistently predicted failure modes and flexural properties after accounting for through boring and knot locations. These models could be improved through more accurate representation of grain around knots and then used to explore the effects of different sizes, species, quantities of knots and checks, and other drilling patterns on strength, and, therefore, would reduce the need for actual physical testing.

References

1.
Graham
R. D.
, “
Improving the Performance of Wood Poles
,”
Proceedings of the American Wood Preservers’ Association
79
(
1983
):
222
228
.
2.
Mankowski
M.
,
Hansen
E.
, and
Morrell
J.
, “
Wood Pole Purchasing, Inspection, and Maintenance: A Survey of Utility Practices
,”
Forest Products Journal
52
, nos. 
11–12
(November/December
2002
):
43
50
.
3.
Brown
D. L.
and
Davidson
D. F.
,
Field Tests of Relative Strength of Incised Fir Poles
(
Portland, OR
:
Portland General Electric Co.
,
1961
).
4.
Graham
R. D.
,
Miller
D. J.
, and
Kunesh
R. H.
, “
Pressure Treatments and Strength of Deeply Perforated Pacific Coast Douglas-Fir Poles
,”
Proceedings of the American Wood Preservers’ Association
65
(
1969
):
234
242
.
5.
Newbill
M. A.
,
James
R.
,
Asgharian
D.
, and
Morrell
J. J.
, “
Full-Length Through-Boring: Effect on Pentachlorophenol Penetration and Retention and Residual Strength of Douglas-Fir Poles
,”
Forest Products Journal
49
, no. 
1
(
1999
):
73
76
.
6.
Elkins
L.
,
Morrell
J. J.
, and
Leichti
R. J.
, “
Establishing a Through-Boring Pattern for Utility Poles
,”
Wood and Fiber Science
39
, no. 
4
(October
2007
):
639
650
.
7.
Morrell
J. J.
and
Schneider
P. F.
, “
Through Boring of Poles for Improving Treatment: Distribution of Preservative and Effect on Performance
,”
Proceedings of the American Wood Preservers’ Association
90
(
1994
):
317
324
.
8.
Morrell
J. J.
,
Love
C. S.
, and
Clauson
M.
, “
Effect of Through Boring, Radial Drilling and Deep Incising on Flexural Properties of Douglas-Fir Poles
,”
Proceedings of the American Wood Protection Association
107
(
2011
):
99
103
.
9.
Graham
R. D.
and
Womack
R. J.
, “
Kiln- and Boulton-Drying Douglas-Fir Pole Sections at 220°C to 290°C
,”
Forest Products Journal
22
, no. 
10
(
1972
):
50
55
.
10.
Morrell
J. J.
and
Norton
J.
, “
Potential for Using Through-Boring to Improve Groundline Treatment of Australian Wood Species: A Preliminary Study
,”
Forest Products Journal
59
, no. 
9
(September
2009
):
61
66
.
11.
Chiang
C. R.
, “
Stress Concentration Factors of Edge-Notched Orthotropic Plates
,”
The Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design
33
, no. 
5
(July
1998
):
395
398
. https://doi.org/10.1243/0309324981513093
12.
Danielsson
H.
, “
The Strength of Glulam Beams with Holes: A Probabilistic Fracture Mechanics Method and Experimental Tests
” (Master’s thesis,
Lund University
,
2009
).
13.
Erickson
P. E.
and
Riley
W. F.
, “
Minimizing Stress Concentrations around Circular Holes in Uniaxially Loaded Plates
,”
Experimental Mechanics
18
, no. 
3
(March
1978
):
97
100
. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02325003
14.
Falk
R. H.
,
DeVisser
D.
,
Plume
G. R.
, and
Fridley
K. J.
, “
Effect of Drilled Holes on the Bending Strength of Large Dimension Douglas-Fir Lumber
,”
Forest Products Journal
53
, no. 
5
(May
2003
):
55
60
.
15.
Smith
C. B.
,
Effect of Elliptic or Circular Holes on the Stress Distribution in Plates of Wood or Plywood Considered as Orthotropic Materials, Report No. 1510
(
Madison, WI
:
U.S. Forest Service
,
1944
).
16.
Wang
Y.
and
Bodig
J.
, “
Knot Interaction in Wood Poles
,”
Wood Science and Technology
25
, no. 
1
(January
1991
):
47
56
. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00195556
17.
Williams
J. M.
,
Fridley
K. J.
,
Cofer
W. F.
, and
Falk
R. H.
, “
Failure Modeling of Sawn Lumber with a Fastener Hole
,”
Finite Elements in Analysis and Design
36
, no. 
1
(August
2000
):
83
98
. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-874X(00)00010-X
18.
Wu
H.-C.
and
Mu
B.
, “
On Stress Concentrations for Isotropic/Orthotropic Plates and Cylinders with a Circular Hole
,”
Composites Part B: Engineering
34
, no. 
2
(March
2003
):
127
134
. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-8368(02)00097-5
19.
Petersson
H.
,
Gustafsson
P. J.
, and
Stefansson
F.
, “
Fracture Analysis of Wooden Beams with Holes and Notches
,” in
Proceedings of the International Wood Engineering Conference
, vol. 
4
(
Madison, WI
:
Omnipress
,
1996
):
4-281
4-287
.
20.
Masuda
M.
and
Honda
R.
, “
Theoretical Analysis on Bending of Lumber Containing Knots by Using Finite Element Method
,”
Journal of the Japan Wood Research Society
40
, no. 
2
(
1994
):
127
133
.
21.
Meguid
S. A.
, “
Finite Element Analysis of Defence Hole Systems for the Reduction of Stress Concentration in a Uniaxially-Loaded Plate with Two Coaxial Holes
,”
Engineering Fracture Mechanics
25
, no. 
4
(
1986
):
403
413
. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(86)90254-7
22.
Wood Poles – Specifications and Dimensions
, ANSI 05.1-2017 (
New York, NY
:
American National Standards Institute
, approved August 1,
2017
).
23.
Elkins
L. A.
, “
Establishing a Through-Boring Pattern and Method of Test for Utility Poles
” (Master’s thesis,
Oregon State University
,
2005
).
24.
Merz
G. K.
,
Merz Method for Heartwood Treatment of Ground Line Area of Poles
(
Portland, OR
:
Portland General Electric Co.
,
1959
).
25.
Crews
K.
,
Boughton
G.
, and
Falck
D.
,
Determination of Characteristic Stresses and Residual Life Expectance of Preservative Treated Hardwood and Softwood Poles
(
Victoria, Australia
:
Forest and Wood Products Research and Development Corporation
,
2004
).
26.
Ramsey
F. L.
and
Schafer
D. W.
,
The Statistical Sleuth: A Course in Methods of Data Analysis
(
Boston, MA
:
Brooks/Cole
,
2013
).
27.
ANSYS, Inc.,
ANSYS 17.0 Program Documentation
(
Canonsburg, PA
:
ANSYS
,
2017
).
28.
Forest Products Laboratory
Wood Handbook—Wood as an Engineering Material, General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190
(
Madison, WI
:
U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service
,
2010
).
29.
Guindos
P.
and
Guaita
M.
, “
The Analytical Influence of all Types of Knots on Bending
,”
Wood Science and Technology
48
, no. 
3
(May
2014
):
533
552
. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-014-0621-8
30.
Eberhardsteiner
J.
,
Mechanisches Verhalten von Fichtenholz [Mechanical Behavior of Spruce Wood]
(
Vienna, Austria
:
Springer-Verlag
,
2002
).
31.
Patton-Mallory
M.
,
Cramer
S. M.
,
Smith
F. W.
, and
Pellicane
P. J.
, “
Nonlinear Material Models for Analysis of Bolted Wood Connections
,”
Journal of Structural Engineering
123
, no. 
8
(August
1997
):
1063
1070
. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:8(1063)
32.
Liu
J. Y.
, “
Evaluation of Tensor Polynomial Strength Theory for Wood
,”
Journal of Composite Materials
,
18
, no. 
3
(May
1984
):
216
226
. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199838401800302
33.
Tsai
S. W.
,
Theory of Composites Design
(
Dayton, OH
:
Think Composites
,
1992
)
34.
Thelandersson
S.
and
Larsen
H. J.
, eds.,
Timber Engineering
(
Chichester
, UK
:
John Wiley & Sons
,
2003
).
35.
Bodig
J.
,
Goodman
J. R.
,
Philips
G. E.
, and
Fagan
G. B.
,
Wood Pole Properties. Volume 2. Douglas Fir Data
(
Palo Alto, CA
:
Electric Power Research Institute
,
1986
).
36.
Bodig
J.
and
Goodman
J. R.
,
Wood Pole Properties. Volume 3. Western Red Cedar Data and Size Effect
(
Palo Alto, CA
:
Electric Power Research Institute
,
1986
).
37.
Phillips
G. E.
,
Bodig
J.
, and
Goodman
J. R.
,
Wood Pole Properties. Volume 1. Background and Southern Pine Data
(
Palo Alto, CA
:
Electric Power Research Institute
,
1985
).
38.
Wood
L. W.
,
Erickson
E. C. O.
, and
Dohr
A. W.
,
Strength and Related Properties of Wood Poles, Final Report
(
Philadelphia, PA
:
ASTM International
,
1960
).
39.
Eggleston
R. C.
, “
Pole Strength Tests
,”
Journal of the Forest Products Research Society
2
(
1952
):
3
24
.
40.
Clauson
M.
,
Morrell
J. J.
,
Romanaggi
B.
, and
Sinha
A.
, “
Nondestructive Bending Tests on Douglas-Fir Utility Poles as a Potential Tool for Pole Sorting and for Prediction of Their Behavior in Service
,”
Holzforschung
71
, no. 
5
(May
2017
):
397
403
. https://doi.org/10.1515/hf-2016-0155
41.
Guindos
P.
and
Guaita
M.
, “
A Three-Dimensional Wood Material Model to Simulate the Behavior of Wood with Any Type of Knot at the Macro-Scale
,”
Wood Science and Technology
47
, no. 
3
(May
2013
):
585
599
. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-012-0517-4
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.