Abstract

The resonant frequency test (RFT) of molded concrete specimens is a nondestructive test (NDT) method for indirect strength estimation based on the fundamental mode characteristic resonance frequency. In this article, experimental, numerical, and analytical studies were performed to assess the sensitivity of test results to various factors involved in RFT. These factors included vibration modes of the specimen, sensor attachment techniques, contact time of the hammer impact, location of the sensor on the specimen, length to diameter ratio (L/D), and cross-sectional shape of the specimen. Experimental study included concrete specimen preparation in the lab and real-time RFT measurements for robustness of some of the aforementioned factors. Computation models developed using numerical simulations were verified by laboratory test and analytical results. The finite element method–based code, ABAQUS, was employed for computational modeling. Statistical analyses of the experimental results and parametric studies of the computational modeling were used to quantify the effect of the aforementioned factors on uncertainties of strength estimates using RFT measurements. The contact time of the hammer impact and the L/D of the specimen were found to have considerable effect on test results and hence on the concrete strength estimates.

References

1.
In-Place Methods to Estimate Concrete Strength
, ACI-228.1R (
Farmington Hills, MI
:
American Concrete Institute
, effective September 16,
2003
).
2.
Standard Test Method for Fundamental Transverse, Longitudinal, and Torsional Resonant Frequencies of Concrete Specimens
, ASTM C215-14 (
West Conshohocken, PA
:
ASTM International
, approved December 15,
2014
). https://doi.org/10.1520/C0215-14
3.
Standard Test Method for Resistance of Concrete to Rapid Freezing and Thawing
, ASTM C666/C666M-15 (
West Conshohocken, PA
:
ASTM International
, approved February 1,
2015
). https://doi.org/10.1520/C0666_C0666M-15
4.
Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary
, ACI-318 (
Farmington Hills, MI
:
American Concrete Institute
, approved August 29,
2014
).
5.
Standard Test Method for Pulse Velocity through Concrete
, ASTM C597-16 (
West Conshohocken, PA
:
ASTM International
, approved April 1,
2016
). https://doi.org/10.1520/C0597-16
6.
Standard Test Method for Rebound Number of Hardened Concrete
, ASTM C805/C805M-13a (
West Conshohocken, PA
:
ASTM International
, approved December 15,
2013
). https://doi.org/10.1520/C0805_C0805M-13A
7.
Sajid
S. H.
,
Ali
S. M.
,
Carino
N. J.
,
Saeed
S.
,
Sajid
H. U.
, and
Chouinard
L.
, “
Strength Estimation of Concrete Masonry Units Using Stress-Wave Methods
,”
Construction and Building Materials
163
(February
2018
):
518
528
.
8.
Sajid
S.
and
Chouinard
L.
, “
Reliability of Resonant Frequency Test for Strength Estimation of Concrete Using Probabilistic Methods
,” in
International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring 2017
(
Lancaster, PA
:
DEStech Publications, Inc.
,
2017
),
1000
1006
.
9.
Sajid
S.
, “
Experimental and Analytical Study on an Innovative Nondestructive Testing Device for Evaluating the Compressive Strength of Concrete Blocks
” (master’s thesis,
University of Engineering and Technology
, Peshawar,
2015
).
10.
Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens
, ASTM C39/39M (
West Conshohocken, PA
:
ASTM International
,
2015
). https://doi.org/10.1520/C0039_C0039M-18
11.
El-Newihy
A.
, “
Application of Impact Resonance Method for Evaluation of the Dynamic Elastic Properties of Polypropylene Fiber Reinforced Concrete
” (master’s thesis,
University of Victoria
,
2017
).
12.
Montgomery
D. C.
and
Runger
G. C.
,
Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers
(
Hoboken, NJ
:
John Wiley & Sons
,
2010
).
13.
Carino
N. J.
, “
Training: Often the Missing Link in Using NDT Methods
,”
Construction and Building Materials
38
(January
2013
):
1316
1329
. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.03.060
14.
Oh
T. K.
, “
Defect Characterization in Concrete Elements Using Vibration Analysis and Imaging
” (PhD diss.,
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
,
2012
).
15.
Diehl
T.
,
Carroll
D.
, and
Nagaraj
B.
, “
Applications of DSP to Exelicit Dynamic FEA Simulations of Elastically-Dominated Impact Problems
,”
Shock and Vibration
7
, no. 
3
(
2000
):
167
177
. https://doi.org/10.1155/2000/931351
16.
ABAQUS, Simulia Corp. ABAQUS Version 2016 Documentation (
Providence, RI
:
Dassault Systèmes
,
2016
).
17.
Verástegui-Flores
R. D.
,
Di Emidio
G.
,
Bezuijen
A.
,
Vanwalleghem
J.
, and
Kersemans
M.
, “
Evaluation of the Free–Free Resonant Frequency Method to Determine Stiffness Moduli of Cement-Treated Soil
,”
Soils and Foundations
55
, no. 
5
(October
2015
):
943
950
. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2015.09.001
18.
Tefft
W. E.
and
Spinner
S.
, “
Cross-Sectional Correction for Computing Young’s Modulus from Longitudinal Resonance Vibrations of Square and Cylindrical Rods
,”
Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards-A. Physics and Chemistry
66A
, no. 
2
(March/April
1962
):
193
197
. https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.066A.019
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.