Abstract

The resilient modulus (MR) of unbound materials, i.e., base and subgrade, is an essential property for the Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG). The MR of the unbound materials is highly dependent upon several factors such as physical properties of the materials, soil type, stress state, and moisture content. The MR values are usually determined by conducting repeated load triaxial compression tests in the laboratory. However, because of the complexity, difficulty, huge time, and effort associated with it, development of an MR prediction model based on soil physical properties has increasingly become an imperative. In this study, a model is developed to estimate the MR of base and noncohesive (A-2-4) subgrade soils that are commonly available in the state of New Mexico from a set of materials’ physical properties. First, subgrade and granular materials have been collected from different construction sites, and a laboratory MR test is conducted in accordance with the test standard AASHTO T-307, Standard Method of Test for Determining the Resilient Modulus of Soils and Aggregate Materials. The pertinent material constants (k1, k2, and k3) in the constitutive model have been evaluated from the laboratory test data using regression analysis. Materials coefficients are correlated to the selected physical properties. A new set of laboratory test results for another pavement site is used to verify the model. It is observed that the prediction model predicts MR values that agree well with the laboratory results. Therefore, the proposed model can be applied to the base and noncohesive subgrade soils for implementation in MEPDG.

References

1.
National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP)
Guide for Mechanistic-Empirical Design of New and Rehabilitated Pavement Structures, NCHRP Report 01-37A
(
Washington, DC
:
Transportation Research Board
,
2004
).
2.
George
K. P.
,
Prediction of Resilient Modulus from Soil Index Properties, Rep. No. FHWA/MS-DOT-RD-04-172
(
Washington, DC
:
Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation
,
2004
).
3.
Liang
R. Y.
,
Rabab’ah
S.
, and
Khasawneh
M.
, “
Predicting Moisture-Dependent Resilient Modulus of Cohesive Soils Using Soil Suction Concept
,”
Journal of Transportation Engineering
134
, no. 
1
(January
2008
):
34
40
. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2008)134:1(34)
4.
Hasan
M. M.
and
Tarefder
R. A.
, “
Evaluation of Resilient Modulus of Subgrade and Base Materials of New Mexico and Its Implementation in ME-Design
,” in
International Conference on Transportation and Development
(
Reston, VA
:
American Society of Civil Engineers
,
2018
),
185
. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784481554.019
5.
Ahmed
M. U.
,
Hasan
M. M.
, and
Tarefder
R. A.
, “
Investigating Stress-Dependency of Unbound Layers Using Falling Weight Deflectometer and Resilient Modulus Tests
,”
Geotechnical Testing Journal
39
, no. 
6
(November
2016
):
954
964
. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20150271
6.
Rahim
A. M.
, “
Subgrade Soil Index Properties to Estimate Resilient Modulus for Pavement Design
,”
International Journal of Pavement Engineering
6
, no. 
3
(
2005
):
163
169
. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298430500140891
7.
Malla
R. B.
and
Joshi
S.
, “
Subgrade Resilient Modulus Prediction Models for Coarse and Fine-Grained Soils Based on Long-Term Pavement Performance Data
,”
International Journal of Pavement Engineering
9
, no. 
6
(
2008
):
431
444
. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298430802279835
8.
Yang
S.-R.
,
Huang
W.-H.
, and
Tai
Y.-T.
, “
Variation of Resilient Modulus with Soil Suction for Compacted Subgrade Soils
,”
Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board
1913
, no. 
1
(January
2005
):
99
106
. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198105191300110
9.
Rahim
A.
and
George
K. P.
, “
Falling Weight Deflectometer for Estimating Subgrade Elastic Moduli
,”
Journal of Transportation Engineering
129
, no. 
1
(January
2003
):
100
107
. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2003)129:1(100)
10.
Ping
W. V.
,
Yang
Z.
,
Lui
C.
, and
Dietrich
B.
, “
Measuring Resilient Modulus of Granular Materials in Flexible Pavements
,”
Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board
1778
, no. 
1
(January
2001
):
81
90
. https://doi.org/10.3141%2F1778-10
11.
Khazanovich
L.
,
Celauro
C.
,
Chadbourn
B.
,
Zollars
J.
, and
Dai
S.
, “
Evaluation of Subgrade Resilient Modulus Predictive Model for Use in Mechanistic–Empirical Pavement Design Guide
,”
Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board
1947
, no. 
1
(January
2006
):
155
166
. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0361198106194700115
12.
Hossain
M. S.
, “
Estimation of Subgrade Resilient Modulus for Virginia
,”
Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board
2101
, no. 
1
(January
2009
):
98
109
. https://doi.org/10.3141%2F2101-12
13.
Yau
A.
and
Von Quintus
H. L.
,
Study of LTPP Laboratory Resilient Modulus Test Data and Response Characteristics, Final Report, No. FHWA-RD-02-051
(
McLean, VA
:
Federal Highway Administration
,
2002
).
14.
Malla
R. B.
and
Joshi
S.
, “
Resilient Modulus Prediction Models Based on Analysis of LTPP Data for Subgrade Soils and Experimental Verification
,”
Journal of Transportation Engineering
133
, no. 
9
(September
2007
):
491
504
. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2007)133:9(491)
15.
Lee
W.
,
Bohra
N. C.
,
Altschaeffl
A. G.
, and
White
T. D.
, “
Resilient Modulus of Cohesive Soils
,”
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
123
, no. 
2
(February
1997
):
131
135
. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1997)123:2(131)
16.
Ping
W. C. V.
,
Ling
C. C.
, and
Sheng
B.
, “
Development of Resilient Modulus Estimation Models for Florida Pavements
,” in
Transportation Research Board 91st Annual Meeting
(
Washington, DC
:
Transportation Research Board
,
2012
), Paper No. 12–2177.
17.
Titi
H. H.
,
English
R.
, and
Fahim
A.
, “
Resilient Modulus of Fine Grained Soils for Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design
,”
Transportation Research Record
2510
(
2015
):
24
35
. https://doi.org/10.3141/2510-04
18.
Standard Method of Test for Determining the Resilient Modulus of Soils and Aggregate Materials
, AASHTO T-307-99 (
Washington, DC
:
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
,
2012
).
19.
Standard Specification for Classification of Soils and Soil-Aggregate Mixtures for Highway Construction Purposes
, AASHTO M-145 (
Washington, DC
:
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
,
2009
).
20.
Moisture-Density Relations of Soils Using a 4.54-kg (10-lb) Rammer and a 457-mm (18-in.) Drop
, AASHTO T-180 (
Washington, DC
:
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
,
2012
).
21.
National Cooperative Highway Research Program
Laboratory Determination of Resilient Modulus for Flexible Pavement Design, Digest No. 285, NCHRP 1-28A
(Washington, DC:
National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP)
,
2004
),
1
52
.
22.
Hicks
R. G.
and
Monismith
C. L.
, “
Factors Influencing the Resilient Properties of Granular Materials
,”
Transportation Research Record
345
(
1971
):
15
31
.
23.
Witczak
M. W.
and
Uzan
J.
,
The Universal Airport Pavement Design System, Report I of V: Granular Material Characterization
(
College Park, MD
:
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Maryland
,
1988
).
24.
El-Badaway
S. M.
and
Witczak
M. W.
,
Development of a Universal Permanent Strain Model for the Subgrade Pavement Materials, Transportation Research Board no. 07–2318
(Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board,
2007
).
25.
Tarefder
R. A.
and
Hasan
M. M.
,
Advanced Statewide Calibration of MEPDG for NMDOT, Final Report, Project ID: NM13MSC-02
(Albuquerque, NM:
Research Bureau, New Mexico Department of Transportation (NMDOT)
,
2017
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.