Abstract

The utilization of construction and demolition waste (C&DW) partially or fully for various purposes in construction industries is one of the most significant solutions to overcome the scarcity of raw materials and disturbances of the environmental system. On the other hand, geopolymer is being tried to be established as an alternative sustainable binder material for ordinary portland cement. In the present study, with the thought of promoting of sustainability, an attempt has been made to use concrete wastes as recycled fine aggregate (RFA) partially to produce fly ash (FA)–based geopolymer mortar. The workability, water absorption, compressive strength at 3, 7, 28, and 56 days, volume change behavior, and chloride permeability of the produced FA–based geopolymer mortar were determined. The effects of RFA, the ratio of alkali liquid (AL) to FA, and different curing regimes on these properties of mortar mix also discussed. The morphology and microstructures of the samples taken from the mortar mix, which were observed having the highest strength under different curing regimes, were studied using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The experimental results indicate lower workability, higher water absorption capacity, and higher drying shrinkage of geopolymer mortar mix that has more RFA content in the mix, but the compressive strength of the geopolymer mortar mix started decreasing after a certain percentage of RFA content in the mix. Utilization of that certain percentage of RFA will help us to minimize the consumption of natural fine aggregates and reduce the disturbances generated by unorganized dumping of C&DW.

References

1.
Saha
S.
and
Rajasekaran
C.
, “
Mechanical Properties of Recycled Aggregate Concrete Produced with Portland Pozzolana Cement
,”
Advances in Concrete Construction
4
, no. 
1
(
2016
):
27
35
, https://doi.org/10.12989/acc.2016.4.1.027
2.
Saha
S.
,
Rajasekaran
C.
, and
Pai
T. V.
, “
Use Of Recycled Coarse Aggregates as an Alternative in Construction Industry – A Review
” (paper presentation, Fourth International Engineering Symposium
, Kumamoto, Japan
, March 2–4,
2015
).
3.
Technology Information Forecasting and Assessment Council (TIFAC)
Utilization of Waste from Construction Industry, TMS150
(
New Delhi, India
:
Department of Science and Technology
,
2000
).
4.
Apoorva
S.
,
Saha
S.
, and
Rajasekaran
C.
, “
Experimental Study on Water Absorption and Accelerated Curing Properties of Recycled Aggregates in Concrete
” (paper presentation, Fifth International Engineering Symposium,
Kumamoto, Japan
, March 3–5,
2016
).
5.
Saha
S.
and
Rajasekaran
C.
, “
Strength Characteristics of Recycled Aggregate Concrete Produced with Portland Slag Cement
,”
Journal of Construction Engineering, Technology & Management
6
, no. 
1
(
2016
):
70
77
.
6.
European Aggregates Association
Annual Review 2011-2012
(
Brussels, Belgium
:
Union Européenne des Producteurs de Granulats
,
2012
),
1
40
.
7.
Indian Brand Equity Foundation “
Cement Industry in India
,”
IBEF
, http://web.archive.org/web/20160115163839/https://www.ibef.org/industry/cement-india.aspx
8.
Davidovits
J.
, “
30 Years of Successes and Failures in Geopolymer Applications. Market Trends and Potential Breakthroughs
,” (paper presentation, Geopolymer 2002 Conference,
Melbourne, Australia
, October 28–29,
2002
).
9.
Davidovits
J.
, “
Geopolymers: Inorganic Polymeric New Materials
,”
Journal of Thermal Analysis
37
(
1991
):
1633
1656
, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01912193
10.
Saha
S.
,
Rajasekaran
C.
, and
Vidhya
S.
, “
Geopolymer Concrete - An Eco-Friendly Concrete: A Review of Recent Scenario
” (paper presentation,
Second International Conference on Sustainable Energy and Built Environment
,
Vellore, India
, March
1
3
,
2016
).
11.
Ahmari
S.
,
Ren
X.
,
Toufigh
V.
, and
Zhang
L.
, “
Production of Geopolymeric Binder from Blended Waste Concrete Powder and Fly Ash
,”
Construction and Building Materials
35
(October
2012
):
718
729
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.044
12.
Anuar
K. A.
,
Ridzuan
A. R. M.
, and
Ismail
S.
, “
Strength Characteristics of Geopolymer Concrete Containing Recycled Concrete Aggregate
,”
International Journal of Civil & Environmental Engineering
11
, no. 
1
(
2011
):
59
62
.
13.
Palankar
N.
,
Ravishankar
A. U.
, and
Mithun
B. M.
, “
Studies on Eco-Friendly Concrete Incorporating Industrial Waste as Aggregates
,”
International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment
4
, no. 
2
(December
2015
):
378
390
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2015.05.002
14.
Palankar
N.
,
Ravishankar
A. U.
, and
Mithun
B. M.
, “
Durability Studies on Eco-Friendly Concrete Mixes Incorporating Steel Slag as Coarse Aggregates
,”
Journal of Cleaner Production
129
(August
2016
):
437
448
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.033
15.
Mithun
B. M.
and
Narasimhan
M. C.
, “
Performance of Alkali Activated Slag Concrete Mixes Incorporating Copper Slag as Fine Aggregate
,”
Journal of Cleaner Production
112
(January
2016
):
837
844
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.026
16.
Mithun
B. M.
,
Narasimhan
M. C.
,
Palankar
N.
, and
Ravishankar
A. U.
, “
Flexural Fatigue Performance of Alkali Activated Slag Concrete Mixes Incorporating Copper Slag as Fine Aggregate
,”
SSP - Journal of Civil Engineering
10
, no. 
1
(
2015
):
7
18
, https://doi.org/10.1515/sspjce-2015-0001
17.
Vásquez
A.
,
Cárdenas
V.
,
Robayo
R. A.
, and
de Gutiérrez
R. M.
, “
Geopolymer Based on Concrete Demolition Waste
,”
Advanced Powder Technology
27
, no. 
4
(July
2016
):
1173
1179
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2016.03.029
18.
Sathonsaowaphak
A.
,
Chindaprasirt
P.
, and
Pimraksa
K.
, “
Workability and Strength of Lignite Bottom Ash Geopolymer Mortar
,”
Journal of Hazardous Materials
168
, no. 
1
(August
2009
):
44
50
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.01.120
19.
Chindaprasirt
P.
,
Chareerat
T.
, and
Sirivivatnanon
V.
, “
Workability and Strength of Coarse High Calcium Fly Ash Geopolymer
,”
Cement and Concrete Composites
29
, no. 
3
(March
2007
):
224
229
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2006.11.002
20.
Rashidian-Dezfouli
H.
and
Rangaraju
P. R.
, “
Comparison of Strength and Durability Characteristics of a Geopolymer Produced from Fly Ash, Ground Glass Fiber and Glass Powder
,”
Materiales de Construcción
67
, no. 
328
(
2017
): e136, https://doi.org/10.3989/mc.2017.05416
21.
Wallah
S. E.
, “
Drying Shrinkage of Heat-Cured Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete
,”
Modern Applied Science
3
, no. 
12
(
2009
):
14
21
, https://doi.org/10.5539/mas.v3n12p14
22.
Ridtirud
C.
,
Chindaprasirt
P.
, and
Pimraksa
K.
, “
Factors Affecting the Shrinkage of Fly Ash Geopolymers
,”
International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy, and Materials
18
, no. 
1
(February
2011
):
100
104
, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12613-011-0407-z
23.
Law
D. W.
,
Adam
A. A.
,
Molyneaux
T. K.
,
Patnaikuni
I.
, and
Wardhono
A.
, “
Long Term Durability Properties of Class F Fly Ash Geopolymer Concrete
,”
Materials and Structures
48
, no. 
3
(March
2015
):
721
731
, https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-014-0268-9
24.
Rashidian-Dezfouli
H.
,
Rangaraju
P. R.
, and
Kothala
V. S. K.
, “
Influence of Selected Parameters on Compressive Strength of Geopolymer Produced from Ground Glass Fiber
,”
Construction and Building Materials
162
(February
2018
):
393
405
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.166
25.
Saha
S.
and
Rajasekaran
C.
, “
Enhancement of the Properties of Fly Ash Based Geopolymer Paste by Incorporating Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag
,”
Construction and Building Materials
146
(August
2017
):
615
620
, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.139
26.
Specifications for Coarse and Fine Aggregates from Natural Sources of Concrete
, IS: 383-1970 (
New Delhi, India
:
Bureau of Indian Standards
,
1970
).
27.
Standard Test Method for Electrical Indication of Concrete’s Ability to Resist Chloride Ion Penetration
, ASTM C1202-18 (
West Conshohocken, PA
:
ASTM International
,
2018
). https://doi.org/10.1520/C1202-18
28.
Code of Practice for Preparation and Use of Masonry Mortars
, IS: 2250-1981 (
New Delhi, India
:
Bureau of Indian Standards
,
1981
).
29.
Specification for Flow Table Use in Tests of Hydraulic Cements and Pozzolanic Materials
, IS: 5512-1983 (
New Delhi, India
:
Bureau of Indian Standards
,
1983
).
30.
Standard Test Method for Density, Absorption, and Voids in Hardened Concrete
, ASTM C642-13 (
West Conshohocken, PA
:
ASTM International
,
2018
). https://doi.org/10.1520/C0642-13
31.
Methods of Test for Strength of Concrete
, IS: 516-1959 (
New Delhi, India
:
Bureau of Indian Standards
,
1959
).
32.
Methods of Physical Tests for Hydraulic Cement
, IS: 4031-1988 (
New Delhi, India
:
Bureau of Indian Standards
,
1988
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.