Abstract

The tensile mechanical response of ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) is distinctly different from conventional concretes and traditional fiber-reinforced concretes. UHPC can exhibit a pseudo-strain-hardening behavior wherein the fiber reinforcement bridging tensile cracks is sufficient to allow for a sustained tensile capacity at stress levels near the tensile-matrix-cracking strength through significant tensile-strain levels. This mechanical response is generating interest in the structural design community; however, quantification of the response through standardized test methods is necessary. Researchers at the U.S. Federal Highway Administration have developed a test that directly measures the tensile response of UHPC-class materials. This test, conceptually similar to the ASTM E8 [ASTM E8-13a: Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2013] test for steel, provides a method to assess the tensile response from elastic behaviors through multi-cracking and eventual crack localization. Prismatic specimens are loaded in direct tension under a fixed-end condition, allowing cast or extracted specimens to be tested under conditions that mimic the tensile loading that can occur within full-scale structural elements. Testing to date has assessed two UHPC matrices and a variety of fiber types/dosages with promising results in terms of test-procedure robustness.

References

1.
Russell
,
H.
and
Graybeal
B.
, “
Ultra-High Performance Concrete: A State-of-the-Art Report for the Bridge Community
,”
FHWA Report HRT-13-060
,
Federal Highway Administration
,
Washington, D.C.
,
2013
, pp.
1
176
.
2.
Graybeal
,
B.
, “
Ultra-High Performance Concrete
,”
TechNote FHWA-HRT-11-038
,
Federal Highway Administration
,
Washington, D.C.
,
2011
, pp.
1
8
.
3.
Graybeal
,
B.
and
Baby
,
F.
, “
Development of a Direct Tension Test Method for Ultra-High-Performance Fiber-Reinforced Concrete
,”
ACI Mater. J.
, Vol.
110
, No.
2
,
2013
, pp.
177
186
.
4.
ASTM C78-10e1
:
Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Concrete (Using Simple Beam with Third-Point Loading)
,
Annual Book of ASTM Standards
,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
,
2012
.
5.
ASTM C496-11
:
Standard Test Method for Splitting Tensile Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens
,
Annual Book of ASTM Standards
,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
,
2012
.
6.
ASTM C1609-12
:
Standard Test Method for Flexural Performance of Fiber-Reinforced Concrete (Using Beam with Third-Point Loading)
,
Annual Book of ASTM Standards
,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
,
2012
.
7.
Baby
,
F.
,
Graybeal
,
B.
,
Marchand
,
P.
, and
Toutlemonde
,
F.
, “
A Proposed Flexural Test Method and Associated Inverse Analysis for UHPFRC
,”
ACI Mater. J.
, Vol.
109
, No.
5
,
2012
, pp.
545
555
.
8.
Wille
,
K.
and
Parra-Montesinos
,
G.
, “
Effect of Beam Size, Casting Method and Support Conditions on the Flexural Behavior of Ultra-High Performance Fiber-Reinforced Concrete
,”
ACI Mater. J.
, Vol.
109
, No.
3
,
2012
, pp.
379
388
.
9.
ASTM E8-13a
:
Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials
,
Annual Book of ASTM Standards
,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
,
2013
.
10.
ASTM C469-10
:
Standard Test Method for Static Modulus of Elasticity and Poisson’s Ratio of Concrete in Compression
,
Annual Book of ASTM Standards
,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
,
2010
.
11.
ASTM E1012-12e1
:
Standard Practice for Verification of Testing Frame and Specimen Alignment Under Tensile and Compressive Axial Force Application
,
Annual Book of ASTM Standards
,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
,
2012
.
12.
ASTM C39-12
:
Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens
,
Annual Book of ASTM Standards
,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
,
2012
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.