Abstract

While the necessity for cost effective and sustainable replacements for virgin paving mixtures is becoming more and more evident in recent years, particularly with asphalt binder and aggregate economics and the obligations for using greener alternatives, contradictory performance results of high percentages of reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) in Superpave mixtures have made the addition of RAP to hot mix asphalt (HMA) quite challenging. Obtaining RAP involves milling and processing that produces an excessive amount of fine aggregates, making it difficult to control the final HMA volumetric properties, especially when higher amounts of RAP are used. In addition, segregation in RAP stockpiles is a common phenomenon which causes difficulties in air void control of the final mix due to higher asphalt content of fine aggregates. Fractionation is a process in which RAP is separated into at least two sizes, typically one coarse and one fine fraction, in order to ensure consistency of RAP. Fractionation is now being increasingly specified for inclusion of higher volumes of RAP in Superpave mixtures; however, whether any improvements of mechanical properties of HMA can be obtained by fractionation is virtually unknown. In this study, the effect of increasing RAP percentage, source of RAP, and replacing RAP with fractionated RAP on the performance of Superpave HMA mixtures was investigated in terms of rutting, freeze-thaw resistance, and cracking resistance by conducting Hamburg wheel track device (HWTD), moisture susceptibility, and complex modulus tests. HMA mixtures in this study were made with the same virgin aggregates and virgin binder using two different sources of RAP by increasing RAP amount from 20 to 40 %. Results showed that the performance can be different based on the aged binder and quality of aggregates in RAP; moreover, the fractionation effect was found to be insignificant on enhancing the performance of Superpave mixtures with RAP.

References

1.
Daniel
,
J.S.
and
Lachance
,
A.
, “
Mechanistic and Volumetric Properties of Asphalt Mixtures With Recycled Asphalt Pavement
,”
Transp. Res. Rec.
, Vol.
1929
, No.
1
,
2005
, pp.
26
28
. https://doi.org/10.3141/1929-04
2.
Al-Qadi
,
I.L.
,
Carpenter
,
S.H.
,
Roberts
,
G.L.
,
Ozer
,
H.
, and
Aurangzeb
,
Q.
, “
Investigation of Working Binder in Hot-Mix Asphalt Containing Recycled Asphalt Pavements
,”
Presented at the Transportation Research Board 88th Annual Meeting
, Washington, D.C., Jan 11–15,
2009
,
Transportation Research Board
,
Washington, D.C.
, -unpublished.
3.
Mogawer
,
W.S.
,
Austerman
,
A.J.
,
Engstrom
,
B.
, and
Bonaquist
,
R.
, “
Incorporating High Percentages of Recycled Asphalt Pavement (RAP) and Warm Mix Asphalt (WMA) Technology into Thin Hot Mix Asphalt Overlays to Be Utilized as a Pavement Preservation Strategy
,”
Presented at the Transportation Research Board 88th Annual Meeting
, Washington, D.C., Jan 11–15,
2009
,
Transportation Research Board
,
Washington, D.C.
, -unpublished.
4.
Shannon
,
C.
,
Lee
,
H.
,
Tang
,
S.
,
Williams
,
C.
, and
Schram
,
S.
, “
Development of Optimum Fractionation Method for High-RAP Mixtures by Sieve-by-Sieve Analysis of RAP Materials
,”
Presented at the Transportation Research Board 92nd Annual Meeting
, Washington, D.C., Jan 13–17,
2013
,
Transportation Research Board
,
Washington, D.C.
, -unpublished.
5.
Norton
,
A.
,
Reger
,
D.
,
DuBois
,
E.
,
Kehr
,
D.
,
Nolan
,
A.
, and
Mehta
,
Y.A.
, “
A Study to Evaluate Low Temperature Performance of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement in Hot Mix Asphalt at Different Degrees of Blending
,”
J. Solid Waste Technol. Manage.
, Vol.
39
, No.
4
,
2014
, pp.
234
243
. https://doi.org/10.5276/JSWTM.2013.234
6.
Copeland
,
A.
, “
Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement in Asphalt Mixtures: State of the Practice
,”
Report No. FHWA-HRT-11-021
,
Federal Highway Administration
,
Washington, D.C.
,
2011
.
7.
Colbert
,
B.
and
You
,
Z.
, “
The Determination of Mechanical Performance of Laboratory Produced Hot Mix Asphalt Mixtures Using Controlled RAP and Virgin Aggregate Size Fractions
,”
Constr. Build. Mater.
, Vol.
26
, No.
1
,
2012
, pp.
655
662
. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.06.068
8.
Al-Qadi
,
I.L.
,
Carpenter
,
S.H.
,
Roberts
,
G.
,
Ozer
,
H.
,
Aurangzeb
,
Elseifi
,
M.
, and
Trepanier
,
J.
, “
Determination of Usable Residual Binder in RAP
,”
Report No. FHWA-ICT-09-031
,
Illinois Center for Transportation
,
Champaign, IL
,
2009
.
9.
Al-Qadi
,
I.L.
,
Elseifi
,
M.
, and
Carpenter
,
S.H.
, “
Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement – A Literature Review
,”
Report No. FHWA-ICT-07-001
,
Illinois Center for Transportation
,
Champaign, IL
,
2007
.
10.
McDaniel
,
R.
,
Soleymani
,
H.
, and
Shah
,
A.
, “
Use of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP) Under Superpave Specifications: A Regional Pooled Fund Project
,”
Purdue University, Report No. FHWA/IN/JTRP-2002/6
,
Purdue University
,
West Lafayette, IN
,
2002
.
11.
Mohammad
,
L.
,
Cooper
,
S.
, and
Elseifi
,
M.
, “
Characterization of HMA Mixtures Containing High Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Content With Crumb Rubber Additives
,”
ASCE J. Mater. Civ. Eng.
, Vol.
23
, No.
11
,
2011
, pp.
1560
1568
. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000359
12.
Huang
,
B.
,
Li
,
G.
,
Vukosavljevic
,
D.
,
Shu
,
X.
, and
Egan
,
B.K.
, “
Laboratory Investigation of Mixing Hot-Mix Asphalt With Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement
,”
Transp. Res. Rec.
, Vol.
1929
, No.
1
,
2005
, pp.
37
45
. https://doi.org/10.3141/1929-05
13.
Rahman
,
F.
,
Hossain
,
M.
,
Hobson
,
C.
, and
Schieber
,
G.
, “
Evaluation of Superpave Mixtures With High RAP Content
,”
ASCE GeoCongress 2012@ State of the Art and Practice in Geotechnical Engineering
,
Rollins
K.
and
Zekkos
D.
, Eds., Oakland, CA, March 25–29,
2012
,
ASCE
,
Reston, VA
, pp.
1632
1641
.
14.
McDaniel
,
R.S.
,
Soleymani
,
H.
,
Anderson
,
R.M.
,
Turner
,
P.
, and
Peterson
,
R.
, “
Recommended Use of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement in The Superpave Mix Design Method
,”
NCHRP Web Document 30
,
Transportation Research Board
,
Washington, D.C.
,
2000
.
15.
AASHTO T-166-13
:
Standard Method of Test for Bulk Specific Gravity (Gmb) of Compacted Hot-Mix Asphalt (HMA) Using Saturated Surface-Dry Specimens
,
AASHTO
,
Washington, D.C.
,
2013
.
16.
AASHTO T-209-12
:
Standard Method of Test for Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity (Gmm) and Density of Hot-Mix Asphalt (HMA)
,
AASHTO
,
Washington, D.C.
,
2012
.
17.
AASHTO T-324-14
:
Standard Method of Test for Hamburg Wheel-Track Testing of Compacted Hot-Mix Asphalt (HMA)
,
AASHTO
,
Washington, D.C.
,
2014
.
18.
Hossain
,
M.
,
Maag
,
R.G.
, and
Fager
,
G.
,
Handbook of Superpave Volumetric Asphalt Mixture Design and Analysis, Superpave Certification Training Manual
,
Kansas State University
,
Manhattan, KS
,
2010
.
19.
AASHTO T283-14
:
Standard Method of Test for Resistance of Compacted Asphalt Mixtures to Moisture-Induced Damage
,
AASHTO
,
Washington, D.C.
,
2014
.
20.
Hafeez
,
I.
,
Ozer
,
H.
, and
Al-Qadi
,
I.L.
, “
Performance Characterization of Hot In-Place Recycled Asphalt Mixtures
,”
J. Transp. Eng.
, Vol.
140
, No.
8
,
2014
,04014029. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000679
21.
AASHTO TP 62-03
:
Standard Method of Test for Determining Dynamic Modulus of Hot-Mix Asphalt Concrete Mixtures
,
AASHTO
,
Washington, D.C.
,
2011
.
22.
AASHTO PP 61-13
:
Standard Practice for Developing Dynamic Modulus Master Curves for Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Using the Asphalt Mixture Performance Tester (AMPT)
,
AASHTO
,
Washington, D.C.
,
2013
.
23.
Aschenbrener
,
T.
, “
Evaluation of Hamburg Wheel-Tracking Device to Predict Moisture Damage in Hot-Mix Asphalt
,”
Transp. Res. Rec.
, Vol.
1492
, No.
1
,
1995
, pp.
193
201
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.