Abstract

This paper investigated the accuracy of the height-to-thickness ratio (h/t) correction factors presented in the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standards to modify the compressive strength of a prism obtained from a test to a standard prism size. In international masonry codes, an h/t of 5.0 is commonly considered as a reference with a correction factor of 1.0. The ASTM code considers the same h/t of 5.0 as a reference for clay masonry; however, for concrete masonry the reference h/t is 2.0. Moreover, while the ASTM standard allows using both full-block length and half-block length prisms in compression tests, in terms of correction factors no difference is specified between the two prism sizes. In this study, finite element models were developed for concrete masonry prisms and calibrated with experimental results. A parametric study was then performed to examine the effect of the prism thickness, h/t, and length-to-thickness ratio (l/t) on the compressive strength. According to the results, considering an h/t value of 2.0 as a reference, the compressive strength of a full-block concrete masonry prism could be over-predicted by about 22 %, which is a significant error on the unsafe side. Moreover, disregarding the effect of the length of the prism provided significant errors in estimating the compressive strength. The conclusion was that the ASTM standard does not accurately evaluate the actual strength of concrete masonry. As a result, an immediate revision for reevaluating the compressive strength of masonry seems necessary. It was recommended to normalize the strength of concrete masonry prisms according to an h/t of 5.0. Moreover, the effect of the l/t and the thickness of the prism should be considered in estimating the strength using correction factors. Some correction factors were suggested based on the finite element model results.

References

1.
Malvar
,
L.
,
Morrill
,
K.
, and
Crawford
,
J.
, “
Numerical Modeling of Concrete Confined by Fiber-Reinforced Composites
,”
J. Compos. Constr.
, Vol.
8
, No.
4
,
2004
, pp.
315
322
. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2004)8:4(315)
2.
ASTM C1314-14:
Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Masonry Prisms
,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
,
2014
, www.astm.org.
3.
AS 4456.4:
Methods of Determining Compressive Strength of Masonry Units
,
Standards Australia
,
Sydney, Australia
,
2003
.
4.
CSA S304-04:
Design of Masonry Structures
,
Canadian Standards Association
,
Mississauga, Canada
,
2004
.
5.
ASTM C42/C42M-13:
Standard Test Method for Obtaining and Testing Drilled Cores and Sawed Beams of Concrete
,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
,
2013
, www.astm.org.
6.
Maurenbrecher
,
A.
, “
Effect of Test Procedures on Compressive Strength of Masonry Prisms
,”
Proceedings of the Second Canadian Masonry Symposium
, Ottawa, Canada, June 9–11,
1980
,
Carlton University
,
Ottawa, Canada
, pp.
119
132
.
7.
Fahmy
,
E.
and
Ghoneim
,
T.
, “
Behavior of Concrete Block Masonry Prisms Under Axial Compression
,”
Can. J. Civ. Eng.
, Vol.
22
, No.
5
,
1995
, pp.
898
915
. https://doi.org/10.1139/l95-107
8.
Khalaf
,
F.
, “
Factors Influencing Compressive Strength on Concrete Masonry Prisms
,”
Mag. Concr. Res.
, Vol.
48
, No.
175
,
1996
, pp.
95
101
. https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.1996.48.175.95
9.
Hamid
,
A. A.
,
Abboud
,
B.
, and
Harris
,
H.
, “
Direct Modeling of Concrete Block Masonry Under Axial Compression
,”
Masonry: Research, Application and Problems, ASTM STP 871
,
Grogan
J. C.
and
Conway
J. T.
, Eds.,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
,
1985
, pp.
151
166
.
10.
Hamid
,
A. A.
and
Chukwunenye
,
A. O.
, “
Compression Behavior of Concrete Masonry Prisms
,”
J. Struct. Eng.
, Vol.
112
, No.
3
,
1986
, pp.
605
613
. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1986)112:3(605)
11.
Wong
,
H. E.
and
Drysdale
,
R. G.
, “
Compression Characteristics of Concrete Block Masonry Prisms
,”
Masonry: Research, Application and Problems, ASTM STP 871
,
Grogan
J. C.
and
Conway
J. T.
, Eds.,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
,
1985
, pp.
167
177
.
12.
Kaaki
,
T.
, “
Behavior and Strength of Masonry Prisms Loaded in Compression
,” M.S. thesis,
Dalhousie University, Halifax
, NS, Canada,
2013
.
13.
Boult
,
B.
, “
Concrete Masonry Prism Testing
,”
ACI J. Proc.
, Vol.
76
, No.
4
,
1979
, pp.
513
536
.
14.
Brown
,
R. H.
and
Borchelt
,
J. G.
, “
Compression Tests of Hollow Brick Units and Prisms
,”
Masonry: Components to Assemblages, ASTM STP 1063
,
Matthys
J. H.
, Ed.,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
,
1990
.
15.
Krefeld
,
W.
, “
Effect of Shape of Specimen on the Apparent Compressive Strength of Brick Masonry
,”
Proc. ASTM
, Vol.
38
, No.
1
,
1938
, pp.
363
369
.
16.
Morel
,
J. C.
,
Pkla
,
A.
, and
Walker
,
P.
, “
Compressive Strength Testing of Compressed Earth Blocks
,”
Constr. Build. Mater.
, Vol.
21
, No.
2
,
2007
, pp.
303
309
. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.08.021
17.
Walker
,
P.
Strength and Erosion Characteristics of Earth Blocks and Earth Block Masonry
,”
J. Mater. Civ. Eng.
, Vol.
16
, No.
5
,
2004
, pp.
497
506
. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2004)16:5(497)
18.
Drysdale
,
R. G.
and
Hamid
,
A. A.
, “
Behavior of Concrete Block Masonry Under Axial Compression
,”
ACI J. Proc.
, Vol.
76
, No.
20
,
1979
, pp.
1047
1061
.
19.
Kingsley
,
G. R.
,
Noland
,
J. L.
, and
Schuller
,
M. P.
, “
The Effect of Slenderness and End Restraint on the Behavior of Masonry Prisms: A Literature Review
,”
Masonry Soc. J.
, Vol.
10
, No.
2
,
1992
, pp.
31
47
.
20.
Livermore Software Technology Corporation
,
LS-DYNA Manual, Version 971
,
Livermore Software Technology Corporation
,
Livermore, CA
,
2007
.
21.
Magallanes
,
J. M.
,
Wu
,
Y.
,
Malvar
,
L. J.
, and
Crawford
,
J. E.
, “
Recent Improvements to Release III of the K&C Concrete Model
,”
presented at the 11th international LS-DYNA Users Conference
, Dearborn, MI, June 6–8,
2010
,
Livermore Software Technology Corporation
,
Livermore, CA
, -unpublished.
22.
Priestley
,
M.
and
Elder
,
D.
, “
Stress-Strain Curves for Unconfined and Confined Concrete Masonry
,”
ACI J. Proc.
, Vol.
80
, No.
3
,
1983
, pp.
192
201
.
23.
Ryu
,
D.
,
Wijeyewickrema
,
A.
,
El Gawady
,
M.
, and
Madurapperuma
,
M.
, “
Effects of Tendon Spacing on In-Plane Behavior of Posttensioned Masonry Walls
,”
J. Struct. Eng.
, Vol.
140
, No.
4
, 04013096,
2014
. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000849
24.
Malvar
,
L. J.
,
Crawford
,
J. E.
,
Wesevich
,
J. W.
, and
Simons
,
D.
, “
A Plasticity Concrete Material Model for DYNA3D
,”
Int. J. Impact Eng.
, Vol.
19
, No.
9–10
,
1997
, pp.
847
873
. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0734-743X(97)00023-7
25.
Markovich
,
N.
,
Kochavi
,
E.
, and
Ben-Dor
,
G.
, “
An Improved Calibration of the Concrete Damage Model
,”
Finite Elements Anal. Des.
, Vol.
47
, No.
11
,
2011
, pp.
1280
1290
. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2011.05.008
26.
Noble
,
C.
, “
DYNA3D Finite Element Analysis of Steam Explosion Loads on a Pedestal Wall Design
,”
Report No. UCRL-TR-227386
,
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL)
,
Livermore, CA
,
2007
.
27.
Schwer
,
L. E.
and
Malvar
,
L. J.
,
Simplified Concrete Modeling With *MAT_CONCRETE_DAMAGE_REL3
,
JRI LS-DYNA User Week
,
Nagoya, Japan
,
2005
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.