Abstract

The ASTM C1550 round panel test is now used widely to assess the post-crack performance of fiber-reinforced concrete (FRC) and fiber-reinforced shotcrete (FRS) and is firmly established as the most repeatable means of post-crack performance assessment available for these materials. However, the 75-mm standard specimen thickness for this test method has limited its application to relatively thin-walled structures such as FRS linings in mines and tunnels. The performance characteristics of FRC in bending depend on the thickness of a member, and thus a specimen with a thickness close to that in the intended application should be used for representative performance assessment. For this reason, tests such as ASTM C1609/C1609M, based on a 150-mm-deep beam, are typically used for thick-walled applications such as FRC tunnel linings and pre-cast elements. Unfortunately, the high single-operator variability characteristic of performance parameters obtained using beam tests has burdened the construction industry with unnecessarily expensive FRC designs, because the resulting margin between target performance and design requirements becomes excessively large. In response to this, demand has arisen for an enlarged version of the 75-mm-thick ASTM C1550 panel that can be used as a quality assurance tool for thick-walled FRC applications. The present paper describes the development of a version of the ASTM C1550 round panel 150 mm thick and 1200 mm in diameter with specific emphasis on developing thickness correction factors and characterizing the single-operator variability for these large test specimens. It also establishes a correlation between residual strengths measured using ASTM C1609/C1609M beams and using 1200-mm-diameter round panels at comparable crack widths.

References

1.
Mindess
,
S.
,
Taerwe
,
L.
,
Lin
,
Y.-Z.
,
Ansari
,
F.
, and
Batson
,
G.
, “
Standard Testing
,”
High Performance Fiber Reinforced Cement Composites
, 2nd ed.,
Naaman
A. E.
and
Reinhart
H. W.
, Eds.,
E&FN Spon
,
London
,
1995
, pp.
384
421
.
2.
ASTM C1609/C1609 M: Standard Test Method for Flexural Toughness of Fiber-Reinforced Concrete (Using Beam With Third-point Loading)
,
Annual Book of ASTM Standards
,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
,
2012
.
3.
Bernard
,
E. S.
, “
Influence of Test Machine Control Method on Flexural Performance of Fiber Reinforced Concrete Beams
,”
J. ASTM Int.
, Vol.
6
, No.
9
,
2009
, JAI102327.
4.
ASTM C1550: Standard Test Method for Flexural Toughness of Fiber Reinforced Concrete (Using Centrally Loaded Round Panel)
,
Annual Book of ASTM Standards
,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
,
2012
.
5.
Bernard
,
E. S.
,
Xu
,
G. G.
, and
Carino
,
N. J.
, “
Precision of the ASTM C1550 Panel Test and Field Variation in Measured FRS Performance
,”
Shotcrete: Elements of a System
,
Bernard
E. S.
, Ed.,
Taylor & Francis
,
London
,
2010
, pp.
29
38
.
6.
Bjøntegaard
,
Ø.
and
Myren
,
S. A.
, “
The Accuracy of FRS Concrete Panel Tests
,”
Tunnelling Journal
, Oct/Nov,
2011
, pp.
44
53
.
7.
BS-EN 14488 Part 5
,
2006
, “
Testing Sprayed Concrete – Determination of Energy Absorption Capacity of Fibre Reinforced Slab Specimens
,”
British Standards
,
London
.
8.
Banthia
,
N.
and
Trottier
,
J.-F.
, “
Concrete Reinforced With Deformed Steel Fibers, Part 1: Bond-Slip Mechanisms
,”
ACI Mater. J.
, Vol.
91
, No.
5
,
1994
, pp.
435
446
.
9.
BS-EN 14651
,
2006
, “
Test method for metallic fibre concrete – Measuring the Flexural Tensile Strength (Limit of Proportionality (LOP), Residual)
,”
British Standards
,
London
.
10.
Gilbert
,
R. I.
and
Sakka
,
Z. I.
, “
Effect of Reinforcement Type on the Ductility of Suspended Reinforced Concrete Slabs
,”
J. Struct. Eng.
, Vol.
133
, No.
6
,
2007
, pp.
834
843
. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:6(834)
11.
Mikhail
,
E. M.
,
Observations and Least Squares
,
Dun-Donnelley
,
New York
,
1976
.
12.
Bernard
,
E. S.
and
Xu.
,
G. G.
, “
Crack Widths in ASTM C1550 Panels
,”
Shotcrete: Elements of a System
,
Bernard
E. S.
, Ed.,
Taylor & Francis
,
London
,
2010
, pp.
21
28
.
13.
Johansen
,
K. W.
,
Yield Line Theory
,
Cement and Concrete Association
,
Camberley, UK
,
1972
.
14.
Tran
,
V. N. G.
,
Bernard
,
E. S.
, and
Beasley
,
A. J.
, “
Constitutive Modelling of Fiber Reinforced Shotcrete Panels
,”
J. Eng. Mech.
, Vol.
131
, No.
5
,
2005
, pp.
512
521
. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2005)131:5(512)
15.
Bernard
,
E. S.
, “
The Influence of Toughness on the Apparent Cracking Load Capacity of Fiber Reinforced Concrete Slabs
,”
J. Struct. Eng.
, Vol.
132
, No.
12
,
2006
, pp.
1976
1983
. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:12(1976)
16.
Bernard
,
E. S.
,
Xu
,
G. G.
, and
Carino
,
N. J.
, “
Influence of the Number of Replicates in a Batch on Apparent Variability in FRS and FRC Performance Assessed Using ASTM C1550 Panels
,”
Shotcrete: Elements of a System
,
Bernard
E. S.
, Ed.,
Taylor & Francis
,
London
,
2010
, pp.
39
48
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.