ABSTRACT

The alkali–silica reaction (ASR) occurs in concrete that contains silica in a reactive aggregate, sufficient alkalis, and sufficient moisture. Although the most widely accepted tests for evaluating ASR potential are the concrete prism test (CPT) and the accelerated mortar bar test, each test has limitations. Because of the need to test concrete mixes within a short period of time, an accelerated autoclave test method (autoclaved CPT [ACPT]) was investigated using concrete prism samples boosted to 3.0 % total alkali content subjected to an exposure temperature of 271°F (133°C) with a corresponding pressure of 29 psi (0.2 MPa) for 24 hours. A suite of aggregates was evaluated by concrete prism specimens using both the ACPT and CPT methods. The ACPT was able to classify individual aggregate fractions for ASR reactivity with 97.2 % accuracy for the proposed limit of 0.09 % expansion for 36 tested mixtures and approximately 130 specimens. Data from this test suggest that a week-long test could be considered an effective screening tool for the alkali reactivity of coarse or fine aggregate fractions. In addition, miniature CPT (AASHTO T 380, Standard Method of Test for Potential Alkali Reactivity of Aggregates and Effectiveness of ASR Mitigation Measures (Miniature Concrete Prism Test, MCPT) and 12-year outdoor exposure block results are evaluated and compared with both CPT and ACPT results. Although the data suggest a general agreement between these methods, further testing is warranted along with multi-laboratory precision evaluation.

References

1.
A. K.
 
Saha
,
M. N. N.
 
Khan
,
P. K.
 
Sarker
,
F. A.
 
Shaikh
, and
A.
 
Pramanik
, “
The ASR Mechanism of Reactive Aggregates in Concrete and Its Mitigation by Fly Ash: A Critical Review
,”
Construction and Building Materials
171
(May
2018
):
743
758
,
2.
F.
 
Glasser
, “
Chemistry of the Alkali-Aggregate Reaction
,” in
The Alkali-Silica Reaction in Concrete
(
Boca Raton, FL
:
CRC Press
,
1991
),
46
69
.
3.
R.
 
Figueira
,
R.
 
Sousa
,
L.
 
Coelho
,
M.
 
Azenha
,
J. M.
 
de Almeida
,
P. A. S.
 
Jorge
, and
C. J. R.
 
Silva
, “
Alkali-Silica Reaction in Concrete: Mechanisms, Mitigation and Test Methods
,”
Construction and Building Materials
222
(October
2019
):
903
931
,
4.
E. R.
 
Latifee
and
P. R.
 
Rangaraju
, “
Miniature Concrete Prism Test: Rapid Test Method for Evaluating Alkali-Silica Reactivity of Aggregates
,”
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
27
, no. 
7
(July
2015
):
04014215
,
5.
Standard Test Method for Potential Alkali Reactivity of Aggregates (Mortar-Bar Method)
, ASTM C1260-22 (
West Conshohocken, PA
:
ASTM International
, approved November 1,
2022
), https://doi.org/10.1520/C1260-22
6.
M. D. A.
 
Thomas
,
B.
 
Fournier
, and
K. J.
 
Folliard
,
Selecting Measures to Prevent Deleterious Alkali-Silica Reaction in Concrete: Rationale for the AASHTO PP65 Prescriptive Approach, FHWA-HIF-13-002
(
Washington, DC
:
Federal Highway Administration
,
2012
).
7.
E. O.
 
Fanijo
,
J. T.
 
Kolawole
, and
A.
 
Almakrab
, “
Alkali-Silica Reaction (ASR) in Concrete Structures: Mechanisms, Effects and Evaluation Test Methods Adopted in the United States
,”
Case Studies in Construction Materials
15
(December
2021
):
e00563
,
8.
P.
 
Rivard
,
M. A.
 
Bérubé
,
J. P.
 
Ollivier
, and
G.
 
Ballivy
, “
Decrease of Pore Solution Alkalinity in Concrete Tested for Alkali-Silica Reaction
,”
Materials and Structures
40
, no. 
9
(November
2007
):
909
921
,
9.
Z.
 
Owsiak
, “
Testing Alkali-Reactivity of Selected Concrete Aggregates
,”
Journal of Civil Engineering and Management
13
, no. 
3
(September
2007
):
201
207
,
10.
D.
 
Jóźwiak-Niedźwiedzka
,
K.
 
Gibas
, and
M. A.
 
Glinicki
, “
Petrographic Identification of Reactive Minerals in Domestic Aggregates and Their Classification According to RILEM and ASTM Recommendations
,”
Roads and Bridges – Drogi I Mosty
16
, no. 
3
(
2017
):
223
239
.
11.
D.
 
Jana
, “
Concrete Petrography - Past, Present, and Future
,” in
Proceedings of the 10th Euroseminar on Microscopy Applied to Building Materials: Extended Abstract and CD-ROM
(
Paisley, UK
:
University of Paisley
,
2005
).
12.
Standard Specification for Concrete Aggregates
(Superseded), ASTM C33/C33M-18 (
West Conshohocken, PA
:
ASTM International
, approved March 15,
2018
), https://doi.org/10.1520/C0033_C0033M-18
13.
A.
 
Leemann
,
B.
 
Lothenbach
, and
C.
 
Thalmann
, “
Influence of Superplasticizers on Pore Solution Composition and on Expansion of Concrete due to Alkali-Silica Reaction
,”
Construction and Building Materials
25
, no. 
1
(January
2011
):
344
350
,
14.
D.
 
Lu
,
B.
 
Fournier
, and
P.
 
Grattan-Bellew
, “
Effect of Aggregate Particle Size on Determining Alkali-Silica Reactivity by Accelerated Tests
,”
Journal of ASTM International
3
, no. 
9
(October
2006
):
1
11
,
15.
S. G.
 
Wood
, “
Investigation of Autoclave Methods for Determining Alkali-Silica Reactivity of Concrete Aggregates
” (PhD diss.,
University of Alabama
,
2017
).
16.
E. R.
 
Giannini
and
K. J.
 
Folliard
,
A Rapid Test to Determine Alkali-Silica Reactivity of Aggregates Using Autoclaved Concrete Prisms, PCA R&D Serial No. 3235
(
Washington, DC
:
Portland Cement Association
,
2013
).
17.
Standard Method of Test for Potential Alkali Reactivity of Aggregates and Effectiveness of ASR Mitigation Measures (Miniature Concrete Prism Test, MCPT)
, AASHTO T 380 (
Washington, DC
:
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
,
2019
).
18.
Standard Guide for Reducing the Risk of Deleterious Alkali-Aggregate Reaction in Concrete
, ASTM C1778-22 (
West Conshohocken, PA
:
ASTM International
, approved March 1,
2022
), https://doi.org/10.1520/C1778-22
19.
M.
 
Thomas
,
B.
 
Fournier
,
K.
 
Folliard
,
J.
 
Ideker
, and
M.
 
Shehata
, “
Test Methods for Evaluating Preventive Measures for Controlling Expansion due to Alkali-Silica Reaction in Concrete
,”
Cement and Concrete Research
36
, no. 
10
(October
2006
):
1842
1856
,
20.
J. H.
 
Ideker
,
A. F.
 
Bentivegna
,
K. J.
 
Folliard
, and
M. C. G.
 
Juenger
, “
Do Current Laboratory Test Methods Accurately Predict Alkali-Silica Reactivity?
ACI Materials Journal
109
, no. 
4
(July
2012
):
395
402
,
21.
A.
 
Suwito
,
W.
 
Jinb
,
Y.
 
Xia
, and
C.
 
Meyerc
, “
A Mathematical Model for the Pessimum Size Effect of ASR in Concrete
,”
Concrete Science and Engineering
4
, no. 
13
(March
2002
):
23
34
, https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=822f7cbdf733a135dd2df563e66765d1bb19a007
22.
M. T.
 
Hossain
,
C.
 
Pachel
, and
J. E.
 
Tanner
,
Evaluation of Mitigation Measures and Development of an Ultra-Accelerated Test to Evaluate ASR Potential in Concrete, FHWA-WY-220F
(
Cheyenne, WY
:
Wyoming Department of Transportation
,
2022
).
23.
B.
 
Fiore
,
M. T.
 
Hossain
,
M.
 
Kimble
,
F.
 
Al Mutawa
, and
J. E.
 
Tanner
,
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Fly Ashes to Mitigate ASR and Using Recycled Concrete Aggregate in New Construction, WY-18/04F
(
Cheyenne, WY
:
Wyoming Department of Transportation
,
2018
).
24.
H.
 
Konduru
,
P.
 
Rangaraju
, and
O.
 
Amer
, “
Reliability of Miniature Concrete Prism Test in Assessing Alkali-Silica Reactivity of Moderately Reactive Aggregates
,”
Transportation Research Record
2674
, no. 
4
(April
2020
):
23
29
,
25.
R.
 
Fertig
,
M.
 
Kimble
,
A.
 
Jones
, and
J. E.
 
Tanner
, “
ASR Potential and Mitigation Measures for Wyoming Aggregates
,”
Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering
29
, no. 
9
(September
2017
):
04017112
,
26.
S.
 
Multon
and
F.
 
Toutlemonde
, “
Effect of Moisture Conditions and Transfers on Alkali Silica Reaction Damaged Structures
,”
Cement and Concrete Research
40
, no. 
6
(June
2010
):
924
934
,
You do not currently have access to this content.