Abstract

The ASTM C1609/C1609M beam test, Standard Test Method for Flexural Performance of Fiber-Reinforced Concrete (Using Beam with Third-Point Loading), has been used for assessing the flexural performance of fiber-reinforced concrete (FRC) for many years. The procedure involves the application of third-point loading to a relatively short, simply supported beam that consequently cracks and experiences extension and pull-out of fibers across the crack. The flexural performance of FRC tested in this way is normally expressed as a function of vertical deflection at the center of the beam. This is limiting because central deflection is specific to this test and is difficult to relate to structural applications. However, the two halves of the cracked beam experience essentially rigid-body rotation about the crack, raising the possibility that the maximum crack width can be calculated as a function of central deflection. Crack width is a more useful assessment parameter because it can be related to many structural applications. In the current investigation, seven FRC mixtures were produced and tested in accordance with ASTM C1609/C1609M, with both central deflection and crack width measured in all tests. The maximum crack width was then calculated as a function of central deflection and compared with the measured values. The results indicate that crack width can be calculated with sufficient accuracy using only the central deflection and crack offset from the center, thereby permitting flexural performance to be expressed as a function of crack width without any change to the current test procedure. The coefficient of variation in postcrack flexural strength was found to be slightly smaller for the same set of specimens when expressed as a function of maximum crack width rather than central deflection.

References

1.
Standard Test Method for Flexural Performance of Fiber-Reinforced Concrete (Using Beam with Third-Point Loading)
, ASTM C1609/C1609M - 19a (West Conshohocken, PA:
ASTM International
, approved December 15,
2019
), https://doi.org/10.1520/C1609_C1609M
2.
Test Method for Metallic Fibre Concrete. Measuring the Flexural Tensile Strength (Limit of Proportionality (LOP), Residual)
, BS-EN 14651:2005+A1:2007 (
London
:
British Standards
, April 3,
2005
), https://doi.org/10.3403/30092475
3.
Fib, Model Code 2010 - Final Draft, Volume 1, Bulletin 65
(Lausanne, Switzerland:
Fèdération Internationale du Béton
,
2012
).
4.
Barr
B. I. G.
,
Lee
M. K.
,
de Place Hansen
E. J.
,
Dupont
D.
,
Erdem
E.
,
Schaerlaekens
S.
,
Schnütgen
B.
,
Stang
H.
, and
Vandewalle
L.
, “
Round-Robin Analysis of the RILEM TC 162-TDF Beam-Bending Test: Part 1—Test Method Evaluation
,”
Materials and Structures
36
, no. 
9
(November
2003
):
609
620
, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02483281
5.
Vandevalle
L.
and
Dupont
D.
, “
Bending Test and Interpretation
,” in
PRO 31: International RILEM TC 162-TDF Workshop on Test and Design Methods for Steel Fibre Reinforced Concrete – Backgrounds and Experiences
, ed.
Schnütgen
B.
and
Vandewalle
L.
(
Paris
:
RILEM
,
2003
),
1
14
.
6.
RILEM Technical Committee 162-TDF “
Test and Design Methods for Steel Fibre Reinforced Concrete: Beam Test
,”
Materials and Structures
35
, no. 
9
(November
2002
):
579
582
, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02483127
7.
Barr
B. I. G.
,
Lee
M. K.
,
Hansen
E. J. D.
,
Dupont
D.
,
Erdem
E.
,
Schaerlaekens
S.
,
Schnutgen
S.
,
Stang
H.
, and
Vandewalle
L.
, “
Round-Robin Analysis of the RILEM TC 162-TDF Beam-Bending Test: Part 2—Approximation of δ from the CMOD Response
,”
Materials and Structures
36
, no. 
9
(November
2003
):
621
630
, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02483282
8.
Bernard
E. S.
, “
Influence of Test Machine Control Method on Flexural Performance of Fiber Reinforced Concrete Beams
,”
Journal of ASTM International
6
, no. 
9
(October
2009
):
1
16
, https://doi.org/10.1520/JAI102327
9.
Zhang
J.
and
Stang
H.
, “
Applications of Stress Crack Width Relationship in Predicting the Flexural Behaviour of Fibre-Reinforced Concrete
,”
Cement and Concrete Research
28
, no. 
3
(March
1998
):
439
452
, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(97)00275-5
10.
RILEM Technical Committee 162-TDF “
Design of Steel Fibre Reinforced Concrete Using the σ-w Method: Principles and Applications
,”
Materials and Structures
35
no. 
5
(June
2002
):
262
278
, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02482132
11.
di Prisco
M.
,
Colombo
M.
, and
Dozio
D.
, “
Fibre-Reinforced Concrete in fib Model Code 2010: Principles, Models and Test Validation
,”
Structural Concrete
14
, no. 
4
(December
2013
):
342
361
, https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201300021
12.
Lee
S.-C.
,
Cho
J.-Y.
, and
Vecchio
F. J.
, “
Simplified Diverse Embedment Model for Steel Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Elements in Tension
,”
ACI Materials Journal
110
, no. 
4
(July–August
2013
):
403
412
, https://doi.org/10.14359/51685787
13.
Conforti
A.
,
Minelli
F.
,
Plizzari
G.
, and
Tiberti
G.
, “
Comparing Test Methods for the Mechanical Characterization of Fiber Reinforced Concrete
,”
Structural Concrete
19
, no. 
3
(October
2018
):
656
669
, https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201700057
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.