Abstract

Studies have shown that end conditions of concrete cylinders tested in compression can have a significant effect on the measured strength of the cylinders, especially when high-strength concrete is used. The ASTM standard for bonded caps has requirements for minimum cube strength of the capping material and maximum cap thickness. However, a study by researchers at the National Ready Mixed Concrete Association (NRMCA) showed that the 50 mm cube strength may not be very useful in determining whether the capping material will perform adequately when testing high-strength concrete. In the study reported in this paper, the dynamic modulus of elasticity and modified cube strength (ASTM C 116) of various capping materials were evaluated as a function of age. The results showed that each capping material has a unique relationship between dynamic elastic modulus and cube strength. The elastic modulus of different capping materials can vary greatly at a given cube strength. For example, at a modified cube strength of 80 MPa, the elastic modulus of neat cement paste, at 30 GPa, was twice the elastic modulus of one sulfur mortar, at only 15 GPa. The elastic modulus of the capping materials was correlated with previously reported cylinder strengths. In cases where the cylinder strength was affected by the capping material, there is evidence that the cylinder strength was related to the modulus of elasticity and not to the cube strength of the capping material.

References

1.
Carino
,
N. J.
,
Guthrie
,
W. F.
, and
Lagergren
,
E. S.
,
1994
, “
Effects of Testing Variables on the Measured Compressive Strength of High-Strength (90-MPa) Concrete
,”
National Institute of Standards and Technology (U.S.)
, NISTIR 5405, 139 pp.
2.
Gaynor
,
R. D.
and
Wedding
,
P. A.
,
1964
, “
Studies of Capping Procedures for Concrete Cylinders: Effects of Type of Material and Cap Thick-nesses (Series J-128)
,”
Joint Technical Information Letter
,
National Sand and Gravel Association No. 227 and National Ready Mixed Concrete Association No. 216
, 27 Nov
3.
Lobo
,
C. L.
,
Mullings
,
G. M.
, and
Gaynor
,
R. D.
,
1994
, “
Effects of Capping Materials and Procedures on the Compressive Strength of 100 × 200 mm (4 × 8 in.) High Strength Concrete Cylinders
,”
Cement, Concrete, and Aggregates
, Vol.
16
, No.
2
, Dec, pp.
173
180
.
4.
Mendenhall
,
W.
and
Sincich
,
T.
,
1992
,
Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences
, 3rd ed.,
Dellen Publishing Co.
,
San Francisco
, Chapter 14.
5.
Ottosen
,
N. S.
,
1984
, “
Evaluation of Concrete Cylinder Tests Using Finite Elements
,”
ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics
, Vol.
110
, No.
EM-3
, March, pp.
465
481
.
6.
Philleo
,
R. E.
,
1955
, “
Comparison of Results of Three Methods of Determining Young's Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete
,”
ACI Journal
 0002-8061, Vol.
26
, No.
5
, Jan, pp.
461
469
.
7.
Troxell
,
G. E.
,
1941
, “
The Effects of Capping Methods and End Conditions Before Capping upon Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinders
,”
ASTM Proceedings
, Vol.
41
, pp.
1039
1052
(includes discussions by Vidal, Murray, and Durelli).
8.
Velleman
,
P. F.
,
1997
,
Data Desk ®User Manual
, Vol.
03
,
Statistics Guide, Data Description Inc.
,
Ithaca, NY.
9.
Werner
,
G.
,
1958
, “
The Effects of Capping Material on the Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinders
,”
ASTM Proceedings
, Vol.
58
, pp.
1166
1186
(includes discussion by Helms).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.