Abstract

Engineers and scientists have a key role to play in the creation and implementation of government policy. Policymakers need access to the technical expertise that is critical to our national progress and security; however, this need is often overlooked by engineering students, faculty, and professionals. Even though a substantial fraction of scientists and engineers end up pursuing jobs in government, engineering curricula do not usually provide any background in policy and for many, the policy-making process remains a black box. The good news is that there are some simple ways to make it more accessible and to encourage increased involvement. In this paper, we provide a brief overview of the federal policy-making process and present a collection of classroom learning activities that link policy-making and implementation to science and engineering. These can easily be added to existing courses without wholesale curricular changes. We also suggest professional development activities for engineers at all stages of their careers and discuss ways for engineers to become involved in the policy process. Introducing learning and career development activities focused on science and engineering policy will better prepare engineers to provide needed technical expertise to policymakers. It may also encourage engineers to consider careers in local, state, and federal government.

References

1.
Reis
,
J.
, and
Ballinger
,
R. C.
,
2020
, “
Creating a Climate for Learning-Experiences of Educating Existing and Future Decision-Makers About Climate Change
,”
Mar. Policy
,
111
, p. 103204. 10.1016/j.marpol.2018.07.007
2.
Sterman
,
J. D.
,
2011
, “
Communicating Climate Change Risks in a Skeptical World
,”
Clim. Change
,
108
(
4
), pp.
811
826
.10.1007/s10584-011-0189-3
3.
Evans
,
M. C.
, and
Cvitanovic
,
C.
,
2018
, “
An Introduction to Achieving Policy Impact for Early Career Researchers
,”
Palgrave Commun.
,
4
(
1
), p.
88
.10.1057/s41599-018-0144-2
4.
Levitan
,
D.
,
2017
,
Not a Scientist: How Politicians Mistake, Misrepresent, and Utterly Mangle Science
,
W.W. Norton & Company
,
New York
.
5.
Rover
,
D. T.
,
2006
, “
Policymaking and Engineers
,”
J. Eng. Educ.
,
95
(
1
), pp.
93
95
.10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00880.x
6.
United States Congress
,
1967
, “
Air Pollution Prevention and Control
,” United States Congress, Clean Air Act of 1963 (Public law 88-206). 
7.
National Institutes of Health
,
2019
, “
NIH's DRAFT Data Management and Sharing Policy: We Need to Hear From You!
,” National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, accessed Jan. 31, 2020, https://osp.od.nih.gov/2019/11/06/draft-data-management-and-sharing-policy-we-need-to-hear-from-you/ 
8.
Fogg-Rogers
,
L.
, and
Hobbs
,
L.
,
2019
, “
Catch 22—Improving Visibility of Women in Science and Engineering for Both Recruitment and Retention
,”
JCOM: J. Sci. Commun.
,
18
(
4
).10.22323/2.18040305
9.
Clerk of the House of Representatives
,
2020
, “
Kids in the House: How Laws Are Made
,” United States Congress, Washington, DC, accessed Feb. 10, 2020, https://kids-clerk.house.gov/grade-school/lesson.html?intID=17 
10.
usa.gov
,
2020
, “
Branches of Government
,” United States Congress, Washington, DC, accessed Feb. 10, 2020, https://www.usa.gov/branches-of-government
11.
Kuxhaus
,
L.
, and
Corbiere
,
N. C.
,
2016
, “
Classroom Journal Club: Collaborative Study of Contemporary Primary Literature in the Biomechanics Classroom
,”
ASME J. Biomech. Eng.
,
138
(
7
), p.
070801
.10.1115/1.4032802
12.
Office of the Clerk of the United States House of Representatives
,
2019
, “
Achieving the Promise of a Diverse STEM Workforce
,” U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, Washington, DC. 
13.
Office of the Clerk of the United States House of Representatives
,
2019
, “
Oversight Hearing on DOE's Role in Advancing Biomedical Sciences
,” U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Appropriations, Washington, DC.
14.
Hu
,
J.
,
2017
, “
Congress Says Your Work is Wasteful. Now What?
,”
Sci. Mag.
10.1126/science.caredit.a1700049
15.
Kaeding
,
N.
,
2014
, “
Wastebook: 100 Silly Government Projects
,” Cato Institute, Washington, DC, accessed Feb. 5, 2020, https://www.cato.org/blog/wastebook-100-silly-government-projects 
16.
Minoff
,
A.
, and
Feder
,
E.
,
2017
, “
Undiscovered
,”
The Wastebook
,
A.
Minoff
and
E.
Feder
, eds.,
WNYC Studios
, New York. 
17.
Burnett
,
K.
, and
Burnett
,
L.
,
2007
, “
RUI: Impaired Metabolism and Performance in Crustaceans Exposed to Bacteria
,” NSF, Alexandria, VA.
18.
Field
,
T. M.
,
Schanberg
,
S. M.
,
Scafidi
,
F.
,
Bauer
,
C. R.
,
Vega-Lahr
,
N.
,
Garcia
,
R.
,
Nystrom
,
J.
, and
Kuhn
,
C. M.
,
1986
, “
Tactile/Kinesthetic  Stimulation Effects on Preterm Neonates
,”
Pediatrics
,
77
(
5
), pp.
654
658
.https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3754633/
19.
Award
,
G. G.
,
2014
, “
2014: Rat and Infant Massage
,” American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC, accessed Feb. 5, 2020, https://www.goldengooseaward.org/awardees/rat-and-infant-massage
20.
AAAS
,
2020
, “
Catalyzing Advocacy in Science and Engineering Workshop
,” AAAS, Washington, DC, accessed Feb. 1, 2020, https://www.aaas.org/ programs/catalyzing-advocacy-in-science-and-engineering
21.
Genetics Society of America
,
2020
, “
Early Career Leadership and Professional Development Program
,” Genetics Society of America, Rockville, MD, accessed Feb. 1, 2020, https://genetics-gsa.org/career-development/early-career-leadership/
22.
AIMBE
,
2020
, “
Aimbe Public Policy Institute
,” AIMBE, Washington, DC, accessed Feb. 1, 2020, https://aimbe.org/institute/
23.
FASEB
,
2020
, “
FASEB Webinars
,” FASEB, Bethesda, MD, accessed Feb. 1, 2020, https://www.faseb.org/Professional-Development/FASEB-Webinars.aspx
24.
Jaffe
,
A. B.
, and
Jones
,
B. F.
,
2016
, “
The Changing Frontier: Rethinking Science and Innovation Policy
,” University Press Scholarship Online.10.7208/chicago/9780226286860.001.0001
25.
Lubell
,
M. S.
,
2019
, “
Science and Technology Policy: A Practical Guide to Navigating the Maze
,” Academic Press, Cambridge, MA.https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/40582329-science-and-technology-policy
26.
Taylor
,
M. Z.
,
2016
, “
The Politics of Innovation: Why Some Countries Are Better Than Others at Science et Technology
,” Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.https://www.amazon.com/Politics-Innovation-Countries-Science-Technology/dp/0190464135
27.
National Research Council
,
2012
,
Using Science as Evidence in Public Policy
,
The National Academies Press
,
Washington, DC
.
28.
National Research Council
,
2014
,
Science of Science and Innovation Policy: Principal Investigators' Conference Summary
,
The National Academies Press
,
Washington, DC
.
29.
Kuxhaus
,
L.
, and
Troy
,
K. L.
,
2018
, “
Bad to the Bone: Multifaceted Enrichment of Open-Ended Biomechanics Class Projects
,”
ASME J. Biomech. Eng.
,
140
(
8
), p. 081008.10.1115/1.4040293
30.
Maass
,
K.
, and
Engeln
,
K.
,
2019
, “
Professional Development on Connections to the World of Work in Mathematics and Science Education
,”
ZDM
,
51
(
6
), pp.
967
978
.10.1007/s11858-019-01047-7
31.
Bilén
,
S. G.
,
Kisenwether
,
E. C.
,
Rzasa
,
S. E.
, and
Wise
,
J. C.
,
2005
, “
Developing and Assessing Students' Entrepreneurial Skills and Mind-Set
,”
J. Eng. Educ.
,
94
(
2
), pp.
233
243
.10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00844.x
32.
Täks
,
M.
,
Tynjälä
,
P.
,
Toding
,
M.
,
Kukemelk
,
H.
, and
Venesaar
,
U.
,
2014
, “
Engineering Students' Experiences in Studying Entrepreneurship
,”
J. Eng. Educ.
,
103
(
4
), pp.
573
598
.10.1002/jee.20056
33.
Greif
,
K. F.
,
1997
, “
Bringing Science Policy Into the Classroom: A Model Course
,”
Polit. Life Sci.
,
16
(
1
), pp.
131
133
.10.1017/S0730938400020335
34.
Mayer
,
S. K.
,
2010
, “
Bringing Science Policy Into the Optics Classroom: Solid State Lighting and United States Lighting Standards
,”
Am. J. Phys.
,
78
(
12
), pp.
1258
1264
.10.1119/1.3480021
35.
ABET
,
2019
, “
Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs
,” ABET, Baltimore, MD.
36.
Loui
,
M. C.
,
2005
, “
Ethics and the Development of Professional Identities of Engineering Students
,”
J. Eng. Educ.
,
94
(
4
), pp.
383
390
.10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00866.x
37.
National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics
,
2017
, “
Table 12-1. U.S. residing Employed Doctoral Scientists and Engineers, by Field of Doctorate and Sector of Employment: 2017
,” National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, Alexandria, VA, accessed Jan. 31, 2020, https://ncsesdata.nsf.gov/doctoratework/2017/html/sdr2017_dst_12-1.html
You do not currently have access to this content.