The use of anthropomorphic test devices (ATDs) for calculating injury risk of occupants in spaceflight scenarios is crucial for ensuring the safety of crewmembers. Finite element (FE) modeling of ATDs reduces cost and time in the design process. The objective of this study was to validate a Hybrid III ATD FE model using a multidirection test matrix for future spaceflight configurations. Twenty-five Hybrid III physical tests were simulated using a 50th percentile male Hybrid III FE model. The sled acceleration pulses were approximately half-sine shaped, and can be described as a combination of peak acceleration and time to reach peak (rise time). The range of peak accelerations was 10–20 G, and the rise times were 30–110 ms. Test directions were frontal (−GX), rear (GX), vertical (GZ), and lateral (GY). Simulation responses were compared to physical tests using the correlation and analysis (CORA) method. Correlations were very good to excellent and the order of best average response by direction was −GX (0.916±0.054), GZ (0.841±0.117), GX (0.792±0.145), and finally GY (0.775±0.078). Qualitative and quantitative results demonstrated the model replicated the physical ATD well and can be used for future spaceflight configuration modeling and simulation.

References

References
1.
Newby
,
N.
,
Somers
,
J. T.
,
Caldwell
,
E.
,
Perry
,
C. E.
,
Littell
,
J.
, and
Gernhardt
,
M.
,
2013
, “
Assessing Biofidelity of the Test Device for Human Occupant Restraint (THOR) Against Historic Human Volunteer Data
,”
Stapp Car Crash J.
,
57
, pp.
469
505
.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24435742
2.
NASA
,
2008
, “
Columbia Crew Survival Investigation Report
,” National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Houston, TX, Report No.
NASA/SP-2008-565
.https://www.nasa.gov/pdf/298870main_SP-2008-565.pdf
3.
Somers
,
J. T.
,
Gohmert
,
D. M.
, and
Brinkley
,
J. W.
,
2014
, “
Spacecraft Occupant Protection Requirements: A Review of the Recent Changes
,”
Aviat., Space, Environ. Med.
,
85
(
9
), pp.
940
948
.
4.
Caldwell
,
E.
,
Gernhardt
,
M.
,
Somers
,
J. T.
,
Younker
,
D.
, and
Newby
,
N.
,
2012
, “
Evidence Report: Risk of Injury Due to Dynamic Loads
,” National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Houston, TX,
Report
.https://humanresearchroadmap.nasa.gov/Evidence/reports/Occupant%20Protection.pdf
5.
Mertz
,
H. J.
,
Irwin
,
A. L.
, and
Prasad
,
P.
,
2003
, “
Biomechanical and Scaling Bases for Frontal and Side Impact Injury Assessment Reference Values
,”
Stapp Car Crash J.
,
47
, pp.
155
188
.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17096249
6.
Yang
,
K. H.
, and
Chou
,
C. C.
,
2015
, “
Mathematical Models, Computer Aided Design, and Occupant Safety
,”
Accidental Injury: Biomechanics and Prevention
,
N.
Yoganandan
, ed., Springer-Verlag, New York, pp.
143
182
.
7.
Danelson
,
K. A.
,
Bolte
,
J. H.
, and
Stitzel
,
J. D.
,
2011
, “
Assessing Astronaut Injury Potential From Suit Connectors Using a Human Body Finite Element Model
,”
Aviat. Space Environ. Med.
,
82
(
2
), pp.
79
86
.
8.
Danelson
,
K. A.
,
Golman
,
A. J.
,
Bolte
,
I. V. J. H.
, and
Stitzel
,
J. D.
,
2015
, “
Simulation of Occupant Response in Space Capsule Landing Configurations With Suit Hardware
,”
ASME J. Biomech. Eng.
,
137
(
3
), p.
031003
.
9.
Putnam
,
J. B.
,
Somers
,
J. T.
,
Wells
,
J. A.
,
Perry
,
C. E.
, and
Untaroiu
,
C. D.
,
2015
, “
Development and Evaluation of a Finite Element Model of the THOR for Occupant Protection of Spaceflight Crewmembers
,”
Accid. Anal. Prev.
,
82
, pp.
244
256
.
10.
Humanetics Innovative Solutions
,
2012
, “
H350 Adult Dummy Model LS-Dyna: Release Version 7.1.8
,” Humanetics Innovative Solutions, pp. 1–21.
11.
Buhrman
,
J. R.
,
Cheng
,
H.
, and
Chaiken
,
S. R.
,
2011
, “
Collaborative Biomechanics Data Network (CBDN): Promoting Human Protection and Performance in Hazardous Environments Through Modeling and Data Mining of Human Centric Data Bases
,” Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH, Report No.
AFRL-RH-WP-TR-2011-0097
.https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a549620.pdf
12.
Perry
,
C. E.
,
Burneka
,
C.
, and
Albery
,
C.
,
2013
, “
Biodynamic Assessment of the THOR-K Minikin
,” Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH, Report No.
AFRL-RH-WP-TR-2013-0128
https://apps.dtic.mil/docs/citations/ADA594506.
13.
Somers
,
J. T.
,
Caldwell
,
E.
,
Newby
,
N.
,
Maher
,
J.
,
Gernhardt
,
M.
,
Untaroiu
,
C. D.
, and
Putnam
,
J. B.
,
2014
, “
Test Device for Human Occupant Restraint (THOR) Multi-Directional Biodynamic Response Testing
,” National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Houston, TX.
14.
Gehre
,
C.
,
Gades
,
H.
, and
Wernicke
,
P.
,
2009
, “
Objective Rating of Signals Using Test and Simulation Responses
,”
21st International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles
, Stuttgart, Germany, Paper No.
09-0407
https://trid.trb.org/view/1100058.
15.
Thunert
,
C.
,
2017
, “
CORAplus Release 4.0.4 User's Manual
,” PDB (Partnership for Dummy Technology Biomechanics), Gaimersheim, Germany.
16.
Putnam
,
J. B.
,
Somers
,
J. T.
,
Wells
,
J. A.
,
Newby
,
N. J.
,
Siders
,
B.
,
Currie-Gregg
,
N. J.
, and
Lawrence
,
C.
,
2016
, “
Evaluation of Mid-Size Male Hybrid III Models for Use in Spaceflight Occupant Protection Analysis
,”
SAFE J.
(epub).
17.
Guha
,
S.
,
2014
, “
LSTC_NCAC Hybrid III 50th Dummy Positioning & Post-Processing
,” Livermore Software Technology Corporation, Troy, MI.
18.
Stemper
,
B. D.
,
Chirvi
,
S.
,
Doan
,
N.
,
Baisden
,
J. L.
,
Maiman
,
D. J.
,
Curry
,
W. H.
,
Yoganandan
,
N.
,
Pintar
,
F. A.
,
Paskoff
,
G.
, and
Shender
,
B. S.
,
2017
, “
Biomechanical Tolerance of Whole Lumbar Spines in Straightened Posture Subjected to Axial Acceleration
,”
J. Orthop. Res.
,
36
(6), pp. 1747–1756.
19.
Yoganandan
,
N.
,
Arun
,
M. W.
,
Stemper
,
B. D.
,
Pintar
,
F. A.
, and
Maiman
,
D. J.
,
2013
, “
Biomechanics of Human Thoracolumbar Spinal Column Trauma From Vertical Impact Loading
,”
Ann. Adv. Automot. Med.
,
57
, pp.
155
166
.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24406955
20.
ISO/TS
,
2014
, “
Road Vehicles—Objective Rating Metric for Non-Ambiguous Signals
,” International Organization for Standardization, La Plaine Saint-Denis Cedex, France, Standard No.
ISO/TS 18571
.https://www.iso.org/standard/62937.html
21.
IIHS, 2017, “
Small Overlap Frontal Crashworthiness Evaluation Crash Test Protocol (Ver. V): Rating Guidelines for Restraints and Dummy Kinematics, Injury Mesures, and Vehicle Structural Performance; Weighting Principles for Overall Rating
,” Ruckersville, VA.
22.
NHTSA
,
1997
, “
Final Regulatory Evaluation, Actions to Reduce the Adverse Effects of Air Bags
,” National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC, FMVSS No. 208.
23.
NHTSA
,
2015
, “
New Car Assessment Program
,” National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC, No. 80-FR-78521.
24.
Olivares
,
G.
,
2013
, “
Hybrid II and Federal Aviation Administration Hybrid III Anthropomorphic Test Dummy Dynamic Evaluation Test Series
,” National Technical Information Services (NTIS), Springfield, VA, Report No.
DOT/FAA/AR-11/24
.http://www.tc.faa.gov/its/worldpac/techrpt/ar11-24.pdf
25.
Pellettiere, J.
,
Moorcroft, D.
, and
Olivares, G.
,
2011
, “
Anthropomorphic Test Dummy Lumbar Load Variation
,”
22nd Enhanced Safety of Vehicles Conference
, Washington, DC, Paper No. 11-0157.
You do not currently have access to this content.