Several approaches (anterior, posterior, lateral, and transforaminal) are used in lumbar fusion surgery. However, it is unclear whether one of these approaches has the greatest subsidence risk as published clinical rates of cage subsidence vary widely (7–70%). Specifically, there is limited data on how a patient's endplate morphometry and trabecular bone quality influences cage subsidence risk. Therefore, this study compared subsidence (stiffness, maximum force, and work) between anterior (ALIF), lateral (LLIF), posterior (PLIF), and transforaminal (TLIF) lumbar interbody fusion cage designs to understand the impact of endplate and trabecular bone quality on subsidence. Forty-eight lumbar vertebrae were imaged with micro-ct to assess trabecular microarchitecture. micro-ct images of each vertebra were then imported into image processing software to measure endplate thickness (ET) and maximum endplate concavity depth (ECD). Generic ALIF, LLIF, PLIF, and TLIF cages made of polyether ether ketone were implanted on the superior endplates of all vertebrae and subsidence testing was performed. The results indicated that TLIF cages had significantly lower (p < 0.01) subsidence stiffness and maximum subsidence force compared to ALIF and LLIF cages. For all cage groups, trabecular bone volume fraction was better correlated with maximum subsidence force compared to ET and concavity depth. These findings highlight the importance of cage design (e.g., surface area), placement on the endplate, and trabecular bone quality on subsidence. These results may help surgeons during cage selection for lumbar fusion procedures to mitigate adverse events such as cage subsidence.
Issue Section:
Research Papers
References
1.
Cowan
, J. A.
, Jr, Dimick
, J. B.
, Wainess
, R.
, Upchurch
, G. R.
, Jr, Chandler
, W. F.
, and La Marca
, F.
, 2006
, “Changes in Utilization of Spinal Fusion in the United States
,” Neurosurgery
, 59
(1
), pp. 15
–20
.2.
Schizas
, C.
, Kulik
, G.
, and Kosmopoulos
, V.
, 2010
, “Disc Degeneration: Current Surgical Options
,” Eur. Cell Mater.
, 20
, pp. 306
–315
.3.
Weiss
, A.
, and Elixhauser
, A.
, 2004, “Trends in Operating Room Procedures in U.S. Hospitals, 2001–2011
,” Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP), Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD, Statistical Brief No. 171
.https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb171-Operating-Room-Procedure-Trends.pdf4.
Rajaraman
, V.
, Vingan
, R.
, Roth
, P.
, Heary
, R. F.
, Conklin
, L.
, and Jacobs
, G. B.
, 1999
, “Visceral and Vascular Complications Resulting From Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
,” J. Neurosurg.
, 91
(1
), pp. 60
–64
.5.
Baker
, J. K.
, Reardon
, P. R.
, Reardon
, M. J.
, and Heggeness
, M. H.
, 1993
, “Vascular Injury in Anterior Lumbar Surgery
,” Spine
, 18
(15
), pp. 2227
–2230
.6.
Sasso
, R. C.
, Burkus
, J. K.
, and LeHuec
, J.-C.
, 2003
, “Retrograde Ejaculation After Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Transperitoneal Versus Retroperitoneal Exposure
,” Spine
, 28
(10
), pp. 1023
–1026
.7.
Marchi
, L.
, Abdala
, N.
, Oliveira
, L.
, Amaral
, R.
, Coutinho
, E.
, and Pimenta
, L.
, 2013
, “Radiographic and Clinical Evaluation of Cage Subsidence After Stand-Alone Lateral Interbody Fusion
,” J. Neurosurg.
, 19
(1
), pp. 110
–118
.8.
Villavicencio
, A. T.
, Burneikiene
, S.
, Bulsara
, K. R.
, and Thramann
, J. J.
, 2006
, “Perioperative Complications in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Anterior–Posterior Reconstruction for Lumbar Disc Degeneration and Instability
,” Clin. Spine Surg.
, 19
(2
), pp. 92
–97
.9.
Scaduto
, A. A.
, Gamradt
, S. C.
, Warren
, D. Y.
, Huang
, J.
, Delamarter
, R. B.
, and Wang
, J. C.
, 2003
, “Perioperative Complications of Threaded Cylindrical Lumbar Interbody Fusion Devices: Anterior Versus Posterior Approach
,” Clin. Spine Surg.
, 16
(6
), pp. 502
–507
.10.
Daffner
, S. D.
, and Wang
, J. C.
, 2010
, “Migrated XLIF Cage: Case Report and Discussion of Surgical Technique
,” Orthopedics
, 33
(7
), pp. 1–8.https://www.healio.com/orthopedics/journals/ortho/2010-7-33-7/%7Ba037bb9c-a7bb-45e4-8931-baf2763d4105%7D/migrated-xlif-cage-case-report-and-discussion-of-surgical-technique11.
Chen
, L.
, Yang
, H.
, and Tang
, T.
, 2005
, “Cage Migration in Spondylolisthesis Treated With Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using BAK Cages
,” Spine
, 30
(19
), pp. 2171
–2175
.12.
Le
, T. V.
, Baaj
, A. A.
, Dakwar
, E.
, Burkett
, C. J.
, Murray
, G.
, Smith
, D. A.
, and Uribe
, J. S.
, 2012
, “Subsidence of Polyetheretherketone Intervertebral Cages in Minimally Invasive Lateral Retroperitoneal Transpsoas Lumbar Interbody Fusion
,” Spine
, 37
(14
), pp. 1268
–1273
.13.
Choi
, J. Y.
, and Sung
, K. H.
, 2006
, “Subsidence After Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Paired Stand-Alone Rectangular Cages
,” Eur. Spine J.
, 15
(1
), pp. 16
–22
.14.
Tokuhashi
, Y.
, Ajiro
, Y.
, and Umezawa
, N.
, 2009
, “Subsidence of Metal Interbody Cage After Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Pedicle Screw Fixation
,” Orthopedics
, 32
(4
), pp. 259–264.https://www.healio.com/orthopedics/spine/journals/ortho/2010-4-33-4/%7Bb1591b68-a29c-4c85-bc73-a4d014af893f%7D/subsidence-of-metal-interbody-cage-after-posterior-lumbar-interbody-fusion-with-pedicle-screw-fixation15.
Beutler
, W. J.
, and Peppelman
, W. C.
, 2003
, “Anterior Lumbar Fusion With Paired BAK Standard and paired BAK Proximity Cages: Subsidence Incidence, Subsidence Factors, and Clinical Outcome
,” Spine J.
, 3
(4
), pp. 289
–293
.16.
Behrbalk
, E.
, Uri
, O.
, Parks
, R. M.
, Musson
, R.
, Soh
, R. C. C.
, and Boszczyk
, B. M.
, 2013
, “Fusion and Subsidence Rate of Stand Alone Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using PEEK Cage With Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2
,” Eur. Spine J.
, 22
(12
), pp. 2869
–2875
.17.
Joseph
, J. R.
, Smith
, B. W.
, La Marca
, F.
, and Park
, P.
, 2015
, “Comparison of Complication Rates of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review of the Literature
,” Neurosurg. Focus
, 39
(4
), p. E4
.18.
Lee
, N.
, Kim
, K. N.
, Yi
, S.
, Ha
, Y.
, Shin
, D. A.
, and Kim
, K. S.
, 2017
, “Comparison of Outcomes of Anterior, Posterior, and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery at a Single Lumbar Level With Degenerative Spinal Disease
,” World Neurosurg.
, 101
, pp. 216
–226
.19.
Kim
, M.-C.
, Chung
, H.-T.
, Cho
, J.-L.
, Kim
, D.-J.
, and Chung
, N.-S.
, 2013
, “Subsidence of Polyetheretherketone Cage After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
,” Clin. Spine Surg.
, 26
(2
), pp. 87
–92
.20.
Lim
, J. K.
, and Kim
, S. M.
, 2013
, “Radiographic Results of Minimally Invasive (MIS) Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LIF) Compared With Conventional Lumbar Interbody Fusion
,” Korean J. Spine
, 10
(2
), pp. 65
–71
.21.
Hildebrand
, T.
, Laib
, A.
, Müller
, R.
, Dequeker
, J.
, and Rüegsegger
, P.
, 1999
, “Direct Three‐Dimensional Morphometric Analysis of Human Cancellous Bone: Microstructural Data From Spine, Femur, Iliac Crest, and Calcaneus
,” J. Bone Miner. Res.
, 14
(7
), pp. 1167
–1174
.22.
Hildebrand
, T.
, and Rüegsegger
, P.
, 1997
, “A New Method for the Model‐Independent Assessment of Thickness in Three‐Dimensional Images
,” J. Microsc.
, 185
(1
), pp. 67
–75
.23.
Guyer
, R. D.
, Auer
, B. P.
, Zigler
, J. E.
, Ohnmeiss
, D. D.
, and Blumenthal
, S. L.
, 2009
, “Relationship Between Endplate Morphology and Clinical Outcome of Single-Level Lumbar Disc Arthroplasty
,” Spine J. Meet. Abstr.
, 9
(10), p.114S.https://journals.lww.com/spinejournalabstracts/Fulltext/2009/11001/RELATIONSHIP_BETWEEN_ENDPLATE_MORPHOLOGY_AND.46.aspx24.
Briski
, D. C.
, Goel
, V. K.
, Waddell
, B. S.
, Serhan
, H.
, Kodigudla
, M. K.
, Palepu
, V.
, Agarwal
, A. K.
, and Zavatsky
, J. M.
, 2017
, “Does Spanning a Lateral Lumbar Interbody Cage Across the Vertebral Ring Apophysis Increase Loads Required for Failure and Mitigate Endplate Violation
,” Spine
, 42
(20
), pp. E1158
–E1164
.25.
Steffen
, T.
, Tsantrizos
, A.
, and Aebi
, M.
, 2000
, “Effect of Implant Design and Endplate Preparation on the Compressive Strength of Interbody Fusion Constructs
,” Spine
, 25
(9
), pp. 1077
–1084
.26.
Perilli
, E.
, Briggs
, A. M.
, Kantor
, S.
, Codrington
, J.
, Wark
, J. D.
, Parkinson
, I. H.
, and Fazzalari
, N. L.
, 2012
, “Failure Strength of Human Vertebrae: Prediction Using Bone Mineral Density Measured by DXA and Bone Volume by Micro-CT
,” Bone
, 50
(6
), pp. 1416
–1425
.27.
Lakshmanan
, P.
, Purushothaman
, B.
, Dvorak
, V.
, Schratt
, W.
, Thambiraj
, S.
, and Boszczyk
, B. M.
, 2012
, “Sagittal Endplate Morphology of the Lower Lumbar Spine
,” Eur. Spine J.
, 21
(Suppl. 2
), pp. 160
–164
.28.
Eswaran
, S. K.
, Gupta
, A.
, Adams
, M. F.
, and Keaveny
, T. M.
, 2006
, “Cortical and Trabecular Load Sharing in the Human Vertebral Body
,” J. Bone Miner. Res.
, 21
(2
), pp. 307
–314
.29.
Hulme
, P.
, Boyd
, S.
, and Ferguson
, S. J.
, 2007
, “Regional Variation in Vertebral Bone Morphology and Its Contribution to Vertebral Fracture Strength
,” Bone
, 41
(6
), pp. 946
–957
.30.
Schmidt
, H.
, Kettler
, A.
, Heuer
, F.
, Simon
, U.
, Claes
, L.
, and Wilke
, H.-J.
, 2007
, “Intradiscal Pressure, Shear Strain, and Fiber Strain in the Intervertebral Disc Under Combined Loading
,” Spine
, 32
(7
), pp. 748
–755
.Copyright © 2019 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.
