An abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a permanent focal dilatation of the abdominal aorta of at least 1.5 times its normal diameter. Although the criterion of maximum diameter is still used in clinical practice to decide on a timely intervention, numerical studies have demonstrated the importance of other geometric factors. However, the major drawback of numerical studies is that they must be validated experimentally before clinical implementation. This work presents a new methodology to verify wall stress predicted from the numerical studies against the experimental testing. To this end, four AAA phantoms were manufactured using vacuum casting. The geometry of each phantom was subject to microcomputed tomography (μCT) scanning at zero and three other intraluminal pressures: 80, 100, and 120 mm Hg. A zero-pressure geometry algorithm was used to calculate the wall stress in the phantom, while the numerical wall stress was calculated with a finite-element analysis (FEA) solver based on the actual zero-pressure geometry subjected to 80, 100, and 120 mm Hg intraluminal pressure loading. Results demonstrate the moderate accuracy of this methodology with small relative differences in the average wall stress (1.14%). Additionally, the contribution of geometric factors to the wall stress distribution was statistically analyzed for the four phantoms. The results showed a significant correlation between wall thickness and mean curvature (MC) with wall stress.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
January 2017
Research-Article
A Methodology for Verifying Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Wall Stress
Sergio Ruiz de Galarreta,
Sergio Ruiz de Galarreta
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
TECNUN,
University of Navarra,
Paseo Manuel de Lardizabal, 13,
San Sebastián 20018, Spain
e-mail: sruiz@tecnun.es
TECNUN,
University of Navarra,
Paseo Manuel de Lardizabal, 13,
San Sebastián 20018, Spain
e-mail: sruiz@tecnun.es
Search for other works by this author on:
Aitor Cazón,
Aitor Cazón
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
TECNUN,
University of Navarra,
Paseo Manuel de Lardizabal, 13,
San Sebastián 20018, Spain
e-mail: acazon@tecnun.es
TECNUN,
University of Navarra,
Paseo Manuel de Lardizabal, 13,
San Sebastián 20018, Spain
e-mail: acazon@tecnun.es
Search for other works by this author on:
Raúl Antón,
Raúl Antón
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
TECNUN,
University of Navarra,
Paseo Manuel de Lardizabal, 13,
San Sebastián 20018, Spain
e-mail: ranton@tecnun.es
TECNUN,
University of Navarra,
Paseo Manuel de Lardizabal, 13,
San Sebastián 20018, Spain
e-mail: ranton@tecnun.es
Search for other works by this author on:
Ender A. Finol
Ender A. Finol
Department of Biomedical Engineering,
The University of Texas at San Antonio,
One UTSA Circle, AET 1.360,
San Antonio, TX 78249-0669
e-mail: ender.finol@utsa.edu
The University of Texas at San Antonio,
One UTSA Circle, AET 1.360,
San Antonio, TX 78249-0669
e-mail: ender.finol@utsa.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Sergio Ruiz de Galarreta
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
TECNUN,
University of Navarra,
Paseo Manuel de Lardizabal, 13,
San Sebastián 20018, Spain
e-mail: sruiz@tecnun.es
TECNUN,
University of Navarra,
Paseo Manuel de Lardizabal, 13,
San Sebastián 20018, Spain
e-mail: sruiz@tecnun.es
Aitor Cazón
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
TECNUN,
University of Navarra,
Paseo Manuel de Lardizabal, 13,
San Sebastián 20018, Spain
e-mail: acazon@tecnun.es
TECNUN,
University of Navarra,
Paseo Manuel de Lardizabal, 13,
San Sebastián 20018, Spain
e-mail: acazon@tecnun.es
Raúl Antón
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
TECNUN,
University of Navarra,
Paseo Manuel de Lardizabal, 13,
San Sebastián 20018, Spain
e-mail: ranton@tecnun.es
TECNUN,
University of Navarra,
Paseo Manuel de Lardizabal, 13,
San Sebastián 20018, Spain
e-mail: ranton@tecnun.es
Ender A. Finol
Department of Biomedical Engineering,
The University of Texas at San Antonio,
One UTSA Circle, AET 1.360,
San Antonio, TX 78249-0669
e-mail: ender.finol@utsa.edu
The University of Texas at San Antonio,
One UTSA Circle, AET 1.360,
San Antonio, TX 78249-0669
e-mail: ender.finol@utsa.edu
1Corresponding author.
Manuscript received June 10, 2016; final manuscript received September 6, 2016; published online November 4, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Keefe B. Manning.
J Biomech Eng. Jan 2017, 139(1): 011006 (9 pages)
Published Online: November 4, 2016
Article history
Received:
June 10, 2016
Revised:
September 6, 2016
Citation
Ruiz de Galarreta, S., Cazón, A., Antón, R., and Finol, E. A. (November 4, 2016). "A Methodology for Verifying Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Wall Stress." ASME. J Biomech Eng. January 2017; 139(1): 011006. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4034710
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Related Articles
The Importance of Patient-Specific Regionally Varying Wall Thickness in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Biomechanics
J Biomech Eng (August,2013)
Automated Methodology for Determination of Stress Distribution in Human Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
J Biomech Eng (October,2005)
2013 Editors' Choice Papers
J Biomech Eng (February,2014)
Computational Growth and Remodeling of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Constrained by the Spine
J Biomech Eng (September,2015)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Openings
Guidebook for the Design of ASME Section VIII Pressure Vessels, Third Edition
Openings
Guidebook for the Design of ASME Section VIII Pressure Vessels
Analysis of Cylindrical Shells
Stress in ASME Pressure Vessels, Boilers, and Nuclear Components