There is a global shift in the teaching methodology of science and engineering toward multidisciplinary, team-based processes. To meet the demands of an evolving technical industry and lead the way in engineering education, innovative curricula are essential. This paper describes the development of multidisciplinary, team-based learning environments in undergraduate and graduate engineering curricula focused on medical device design. In these programs, students actively collaborate with clinicians, professional engineers, business professionals, and their peers to develop innovative solutions to real-world problems. In the undergraduate senior capstone courses, teams of biomedical engineering (BME) and business students have produced and delivered numerous functional prototypes to satisfied clients. Pursuit of commercialization of devices has led to intellectual property (IP) disclosures and patents. Assessments have indicated high levels of success in attainment of student learning outcomes and student satisfaction with their undergraduate design experience. To advance these projects toward commercialization and further promote innovative team-based learning, a Master of Engineering (MEng) in Design and Commercialization was recently launched. The MEng facilitates teams of graduate students in engineering, life sciences, and business who engage in innovation-commercialization (IC) projects and coursework that take innovative ideas through research and development (R&D) to create marketable devices. The activities are structured with students working together as a “virtual company,” with targeted outcomes of commercialization (license agreements and new start-ups), competitive job placement, and/or career advancement.

References

References
1.
NIBIB
,
2012
, “
Today's Vision, Tomorrow's Healthcare: The 2012–2016 Strategic Plan of the National Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering
,” National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (
NIBIB
), Bethesda, MD.
2.
Terpenny
,
J. P.
,
Goff
,
R. M.
,
Vernon
,
M. R.
, and
Green
,
W. R.
,
2006
, “
Utilizing Assistive Technology Design Project and Interdisciplinary Teams to Foster Inquiry and Learning in Engineering Design
,”
Int. J. Eng. Educ.
,
22
(
3
), pp.
609
616
.
3.
Corporation for National and Community Service
,
1993
, “
National and Community Service Trust Act of 1993
,” Corporation for National and Community Service, Washington, DC, http:www.nationalservice.org/pdf/cncs_statute_1993.pdf
4.
Miyares
,
U.
,
Newman
,
P.
, and
May-Newman
,
K.
,
2007
, “
Senior Design Projects in Assistive Technology: Opportunities for Technology Transfer
,”
Annual ASEE Conference and Exposition
,
Honolulu, HI
, June 24–27, p. 12.1269.
5.
Zenios
,
S.
,
Makower
,
J.
, and
Yock
,
P.
,
2010
,
Biodesign: The Process of Innovating Medical Technologies
,
Cambridge University Press
, New York.
6.
Crooks
,
T.
,
2001
, “
The Validity of Formative Assessments
,”
British Educational Research Association Annual Conference
,
University of Leeds
,
Leeds, UK
, Sept. 13–15.
7.
Black
,
P.
, and
William
,
D.
,
1998
, “
Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards Through Classroom Assessment
,”
Phi Delta Kappa Int.
,
80
(
2
), pp.
139
149
.
8.
Osterwalder
,
A.
, and
Pigneur
,
Y.
,
2010
,
Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers
,
Wiley
, New York.
9.
Lencioni
,
P.
,
2002
,
The Five Dysfunctions of a Team
,
Jossey-Bass
,
San Francisco, CA
.
10.
Patterson
,
K.
,
Grenny
,
J.
,
Maxfield
,
D.
,
McMillan
,
R.
, and
Switzler
,
A.
,
2013
,
Crucial Accountability
,
2nd ed.
,
McGraw-Hill
, New York.
11.
Dutson
,
A. J.
,
Todd
,
R. H.
,
Magleby
,
S. P.
, and
Sorenson
,
C. D.
,
1997
, “
A Review of Literature on Teaching Engineering Design Through Project-Oriented Capstone Courses
,”
ASEE J. Eng. Educ.
,
86
(
1
), pp.
17
28
.
12.
Duffy
,
J.
,
Tsang
,
E.
, and
Lord
,
S.
,
2000
, “
Service Learning in Engineering: What, Why, and How?
ASEE Annual Conference and Exhibition
,
St. Louis, MO
, June 18–21, pp.
5.543.1
5.543.9
.
13.
National Research Council
,
2003
,
How People Learn: Bridging Research and Practice
,
S.
Donovan
,
J.
Bransford
, and
J.
Pellegrino
, eds., National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
14.
Brown
,
A.
,
1987
, “
Metacognition, Executive Control, Self-Regulation, and Other More Mysterious Mechanisms
,”
Metacognition, Motivation, Understanding
,
F.
Weinert
and
R.
Kluwe
, eds.,
Erlbaum
, Hillsdale,
NJ
, pp.
65
116
.
15.
Shimamura
,
A. P.
,
2000
, “
Toward a Cognitive Neuroscience of Metacognition
,”
Conscious. Cognit.
,
9
(
2
), pp.
313
323
.
16.
Marin
,
J. A.
,
Armstrong
,
J. E.
, and
Kays
,
J. L.
,
1999
, “
Elements of an Optimal Capstone Design Experience
,”
J. Eng. Educ.
,
88
(
1
), pp.
19
22
.
17.
Ramirez
,
J. J.
,
2012
, “
The Intentional Mentor: Effective Mentorship of Undergraduate Science Students
,”
J. Undergrad. Neurosci. Educ.
,
11
(
1
), pp.
A55
A63
.
You do not currently have access to this content.