Strain gages are commonly used to measure bone strain, but only provide strain at a single location. Digital image correlation (DIC) is an optical technique that provides the displacement, and therefore strain, over an entire region of interest on the bone surface. This study compares vertebral body strains measured using strain gages and DIC. The anterior surfaces of 15 cadaveric porcine vertebrae were prepared with a strain rosette and a speckled paint pattern for DIC. The vertebrae were loaded in compression with a materials testing machine, and two high-resolution cameras were used to image the anterior surface of the bones. The mean noise levels for the strain rosette and DIC were 1 με and 24 με, respectively. Bland–Altman analysis was used to compare strain from the DIC and rosette (excluding 44% of trials with some evidence of strain rosette failure or debonding); the mean difference ± 2 standard deviations (SDs) was −108 με ± 702 με for the minimum (compressive) principal strain and −53 με ± 332 με for the maximum (tensile) principal strain. Although the DIC has higher noise, it avoids the relatively high risk we observed of strain gage debonding. These results can be used to develop guidelines for selecting a method to measure strain on bone.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Technical Briefs
Comparison of Strain Rosettes and Digital Image Correlation for Measuring Vertebral Body Strain
Hannah Gustafson,
Hannah Gustafson
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of British Columbia,
818 West 10th Avenue,
Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
e-mail: hgustafs@interchange.ubc.ca
University of British Columbia,
818 West 10th Avenue,
Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
e-mail: hgustafs@interchange.ubc.ca
Search for other works by this author on:
Gunter Siegmund,
Gunter Siegmund
MEA Forensic Engineers & Scientists,
11-11151 Horseshoe Way,
Richmond, BC V7A 4S5, Canada;
11-11151 Horseshoe Way,
Richmond, BC V7A 4S5, Canada;
School of Kinesiology,
University of British Columbia,
210-6081 University Boulevard,
Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z1, Canada
e-mail: gunter.siegmund@meaforensic.com
University of British Columbia,
210-6081 University Boulevard,
Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z1, Canada
e-mail: gunter.siegmund@meaforensic.com
Search for other works by this author on:
Peter Cripton
Peter Cripton
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of British Columbia,
818 West 10th Avenue,
Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
e-mail: cripton@mech.ubc.ca
University of British Columbia,
818 West 10th Avenue,
Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
e-mail: cripton@mech.ubc.ca
Search for other works by this author on:
Hannah Gustafson
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of British Columbia,
818 West 10th Avenue,
Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
e-mail: hgustafs@interchange.ubc.ca
University of British Columbia,
818 West 10th Avenue,
Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
e-mail: hgustafs@interchange.ubc.ca
Gunter Siegmund
MEA Forensic Engineers & Scientists,
11-11151 Horseshoe Way,
Richmond, BC V7A 4S5, Canada;
11-11151 Horseshoe Way,
Richmond, BC V7A 4S5, Canada;
School of Kinesiology,
University of British Columbia,
210-6081 University Boulevard,
Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z1, Canada
e-mail: gunter.siegmund@meaforensic.com
University of British Columbia,
210-6081 University Boulevard,
Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z1, Canada
e-mail: gunter.siegmund@meaforensic.com
Peter Cripton
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of British Columbia,
818 West 10th Avenue,
Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
e-mail: cripton@mech.ubc.ca
University of British Columbia,
818 West 10th Avenue,
Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
e-mail: cripton@mech.ubc.ca
Manuscript received August 31, 2015; final manuscript received February 9, 2016; published online March 15, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Kristen Billiar.
J Biomech Eng. May 2016, 138(5): 054501 (6 pages)
Published Online: March 15, 2016
Article history
Received:
August 31, 2015
Revised:
February 9, 2016
Citation
Gustafson, H., Siegmund, G., and Cripton, P. (March 15, 2016). "Comparison of Strain Rosettes and Digital Image Correlation for Measuring Vertebral Body Strain." ASME. J Biomech Eng. May 2016; 138(5): 054501. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4032799
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Related Articles
Simulation of Physiological Loading in Total Hip Replacements
J Biomech Eng (August,2006)
Validity of Photoelastic Strain Measurement on Cadaveric Proximal Femora
J Biomech Eng (August,2000)
A Generalized Approach for Reconstructing the Three-Dimensional Shape of Slender Structures Including the Effects of Curvature, Shear, Torsion, and Elongation
J. Appl. Mech (April,2017)
Full-Field Strain Measurement During Mechanical Testing of the Human Femur at Physiologically Relevant Strain Rates
J Biomech Eng (November,2014)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Mash 2-1 Multi-Bit Sigma-Delta Modulator for WLAN
International Conference on Future Computer and Communication, 3rd (ICFCC 2011)
Constrained Spectrum Denoising Based on Sparse Representation
International Conference on Computer and Computer Intelligence (ICCCI 2011)
Meshless Methods for Full Field Displacement and Strain Measurement
Advances in Computers and Information in Engineering Research, Volume 1