This paper reviews and further develops pore-scale computational flow modeling techniques used for creeping flow through orthotropic fiber bundles used in blood oxygenators. Porous model significantly reduces geometrical complexity by taking a homogenization approach to model the fiber bundles. This significantly simplifies meshing and can avoid large time-consuming simulations. Analytical relationships between permeability and porosity exist for Newtonian flow through regular arrangements of fibers and are commonly used in macroscale porous models by introducing a Darcy viscous term in the flow momentum equations. To this extent, verification of analytical Newtonian permeability–porosity relationships has been conducted for parallel and transverse flow through square and staggered arrangements of fibers. Similar procedures are then used to determine the permeability–porosity relationship for non-Newtonian blood. The results demonstrate that modeling non-Newtonian shear-thinning fluids in porous media can be performed via a generalized Darcy equation with a porous medium viscosity decomposed into a constant term and a directional expression through least squares fitting. This concept is then investigated for various non-Newtonian blood viscosity models. The proposed methodology is conducted with two different porous model approaches, homogeneous and heterogeneous, and validated against a high-fidelity model. The results of the heterogeneous porous model approach yield improved pressure and velocity distribution which highlights the importance of wall effects.
Pore-Scale Modeling of Non-Newtonian Shear-Thinning Fluids in Blood Oxygenator Design
Manuscript received October 9, 2015; final manuscript received January 26, 2016; published online March 9, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Tim David.
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
Low, K. W. Q., van Loon, R., Rolland, S. A., and Sienz, J. (March 9, 2016). "Pore-Scale Modeling of Non-Newtonian Shear-Thinning Fluids in Blood Oxygenator Design." ASME. J Biomech Eng. May 2016; 138(5): 051001. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4032801
Download citation file: