The geometric fidelity of the inner organs on finite-element model (FEM) of the human body and the choice to use discontinuous mesh engender the appearance of empty spaces that do not reflect the real-life situation of human body cavities. The aim of this study is to assess the influence of these empty spaces on the behavior of a simplified FEM built with three different structures in interaction which properties are relevant with the abdominal cavity. This FEM is made up of a large sphere (peritoneum) containing two hemispheres (liver and spleen). The space between peritoneum and inner organs was defined with two different approaches and assessed under impact conditions. The first is a meshfree space (Mfs) approach, e.g., consider the space as a perfect gas. The second approach, meshed space (MS), entailed adding volumetric elements in the empty space. From each approach, one optimal configuration was identified regarding the recorded force versus compression, the mobility of inner organs, and the space incompressibility. This space has a considerable influence on the behavior of the FEM and mainly on the applied loadings of inner organs (difference reaching 70% according to the configuration). For the first approach, the incompressible gas is designated because it guarantees space incompressibility (vf/vi = 1) and inner organs loading with the lowest delay (for high impact velocity: Peak force = 89 N, compression 47%). For the second approach, the discontinuous volumetric mesh is preferred because it promotes space incompressibility (vf/vi = 0.94) and acceptable force reaction (for high impact velocity: Peak force = 97 N, compression 49%). The current study shows the importance of this space on the human FEMs cavities behavior and proposes two configurations able to be used in a future study including detailed FEM.

References

References
1.
Robin
,
S.
,
2001
, “
HUMOS: Human Model for Safety – A Joint Effort Towards the Development of Refined Human-Like Car Occupant Models
,”
17th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety Vehicle
,
p. 29
7
.
2.
Behr
,
M.
,
Arnoux
,
P. J.
,
Serre
,
T.
,
Bidal
,
S.
,
Kang
,
H. S.
,
Thollon
,
L.
,
Cavallero
,
C.
,
Kayvantash
,
K.
, and
Brunet
,
C.
,
2003
, “
A Human Model for Road Safety: From Geometrical Acquisition to Model Validation With Radioss
,”
Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng.
,
6
(
4
), pp.
263
273
.10.1080/10255840310001606080
3.
Lee
,
J. B.
, and
Yang
,
K. H.
,
2001
, “
Development of a Finite Element Model of the Human Abdomen
,”
Stapp Car Crash J.
,
45
, pp.
79
100
.
4.
Ruan
,
J. S.
,
El-Jawahri
,
R.
,
Barbat
,
S.
, and
Prasad
,
P.
,
2005
, “
Biomechanical Analysis of Human Abdominal Impact Responses and Injuries Through Finite Element Simulations of a Full Human Body Model
,”
Stapp Car Crash J.
,
49
, pp.
343
366
.
5.
Watanabe
,
R.
,
Miyazaki
,
H.
,
Kitagawa
,
Y.
, and
Yasuki
,
T.
,
2011
, “
Research of Collision Speed Dependency of Pedestrian Head and Chest Injuries Using Human FE Model (THUMS Version 4)
,”
22nd International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV)
, WA, pp.
11–0043
.
6.
Gayzik
,
F. S.
,
Moreno
,
D. P.
,
Vavalle
,
N. A.
,
Rhyne
,
A. C.
, and
Stitzel
,
J. D.
,
2012
, “
Development of a Full Human Body Finite Element Model for Blunt Injury Prediction Utilizing a Multi-Modality Medical Imaging Protocol
,”
12th International LS-DYNA Conference
,
Detroit
, pp.
1
14
.
7.
Shigeta
,
K.
,
Kitagawa
,
Y.
, and
Yasuki
,
T.
,
2009
, “
Development of Next Generation Human Body FE Model Capable of Organ Injury Prediction
,”
21st International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles
, N. H. T. S. Administration, ed., Stuttgart, Germany, pp.
09
0111
.
8.
Bidal
,
S.
,
2003
, “
Reconstruction tridimensionnelle d'éléments anatomiques et génération automatique de maillages éléments finis optimisés
,” http://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/54/50/18/PDF/030916_TheseSamuelBidal.pdf
9.
Labé
,
A.
,
Arnoux
,
P.-J.
,
Behr
,
M.
,
Kayvantash
,
K.
, and
Brunet
,
C.
,
2006
, “
Advanced Finite Element Model to Simulate Pelvic Failure Process
,”
7th International Symposium on Computer Methods in Biomechanics
, Nice,
France
.
10.
De Keulenaer
,
B. L.
,
De Waele
,
J. J.
,
Powell
,
B.
, and
Malbrain
,
M. L.
,
2009
, “
What Is Normal Intra-Abdominal Pressure and How Is It Affected by Positioning, Body Mass and Positive End-Expiratory Pressure?
,”
Intensive Care Med.
,
35
(
6
), pp.
969
976
.10.1007/s00134-009-1445-0
11.
Sanchez
,
N. C.
,
Tenofsky
,
P. L.
,
Dort
,
J. M.
,
Shen
,
L. Y.
,
Helmer
,
S. D.
, and
Smith
,
R. S.
,
2001
, “
What Is Normal Intra-Abdominal Pressure?
,”
Am. Surg.
,
67
(
3
), pp.
243
248
.
12.
Alkhouli
,
N.
,
Mansfield
,
J.
,
Green
,
E.
,
Bell
,
J.
,
Knight
,
B.
,
Liversedge
,
N.
,
Tham
,
J. C.
,
Welbourn
,
R.
,
Shore
,
A. C.
,
Kos
,
K.
, and
Winlove
,
C. P.
,
2013
, “
The Mechanical Properties of Human Adipose Tissues and Their Relationships to the Structure and Composition of the Extracellular Matrix
,”
Am. J. Physiol.: Endocrinol. Metab.
,
305
(
12
), pp.
E1427
1435
10.1152/ajpendo.00111.2013.
13.
Viano
,
D. C.
,
1989
, “
Biomechanical Responses and Injuries in Blunt Lateral Impact
,”
31st Stapp Car Crash Conference
, SAE, ed., Society of Automotive Engineers, NY, ETATS-UNIS, pp.
205
224
10.4271/892432.
You do not currently have access to this content.