A significant number of elderly patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis are denied surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) because of high operative risk. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has emerged as a valid alternative to SAVR in these patients. One of the main characteristics of TAVI, when compared to SAVR, is that the diseased native aortic valve remains in place. For hemodynamic testing of new percutaneous valves and clinical training, one should rely on animal models. However, the development of an appropriate animal model of severe aortic stenosis is not straightforward. This work aims at developing and testing an elastic model of the ascending aorta including a severe aortic stenosis. The physical model was built based on a previous silicone model and tested experimentally in this study. Experimental results showed that the error between the computer-aided design (CAD) file and the physical elastic model was <5%, the compliance of the ascending aorta was 1.15 ml/mm Hg, the effective orifice area (EOA) of the stenotic valve was 0.86 cm2, the peak jet velocity was 4.9 m/s and mean transvalvular pressure gradient was 50 mm Hg, consistent with as severe. An EDWARDS-SAPIEN 26 mm valve was then implanted in the model leading to a significant increase in EOA (2.22 cm2) and a significant decrease in both peak jet velocity (1.29 m/s) and mean transvalvular pressure gradient (3.1 mm Hg). This model can be useful for preliminary in vitro testing of percutaneous valves before more extensive animal and in vivo tests.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Technical Briefs
An In Vitro Model of Aortic Stenosis for the Assessment of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
Hoda Maleki,
Hoda Maleki
Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering,
Laboratory of Cardiovascular Fluid Dynamics,
Laboratory of Cardiovascular Fluid Dynamics,
Concordia University
,Montreal, QC H3G 1M8
, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Shahrokh Shahriari,
Shahrokh Shahriari
1
University of Montreal Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM)
,Montreal, QC H2X 0A9
, Canada
;Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering,
Laboratory of Cardiovascular Fluid Dynamics,
e-mail: lcfd@encs.concordia.ca
Laboratory of Cardiovascular Fluid Dynamics,
Concordia University
,Montreal, QC H3G 1M8
, Canada
e-mail: lcfd@encs.concordia.ca
1Corresponding author.
Search for other works by this author on:
Michel Labrosse,
Michel Labrosse
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Ottawa
,Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5
, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Philippe Pibarot,
Philippe Pibarot
Quebec Heart and Lung Institute,
Laval University
,Quebec, QC G1V 0A6
, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Lyes Kadem
Lyes Kadem
Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering,
Laboratory of Cardiovascular Fluid Dynamics,
Laboratory of Cardiovascular Fluid Dynamics,
Concordia University
,Montreal, QC H3G 1M8
, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Hoda Maleki
Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering,
Laboratory of Cardiovascular Fluid Dynamics,
Laboratory of Cardiovascular Fluid Dynamics,
Concordia University
,Montreal, QC H3G 1M8
, Canada
Shahrokh Shahriari
University of Montreal Hospital Research Center (CRCHUM)
,Montreal, QC H2X 0A9
, Canada
;Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering,
Laboratory of Cardiovascular Fluid Dynamics,
e-mail: lcfd@encs.concordia.ca
Laboratory of Cardiovascular Fluid Dynamics,
Concordia University
,Montreal, QC H3G 1M8
, Canada
e-mail: lcfd@encs.concordia.ca
Michel Labrosse
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Ottawa
,Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5
, Canada
Philippe Pibarot
Quebec Heart and Lung Institute,
Laval University
,Quebec, QC G1V 0A6
, Canada
Lyes Kadem
Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering,
Laboratory of Cardiovascular Fluid Dynamics,
Laboratory of Cardiovascular Fluid Dynamics,
Concordia University
,Montreal, QC H3G 1M8
, Canada
1Corresponding author.
Manuscript received August 30, 2013; final manuscript received January 19, 2014; accepted manuscript posted January 27, 2014; published online April 10, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Jonathan Vande Geest.
J Biomech Eng. May 2014, 136(5): 054501 (4 pages)
Published Online: April 10, 2014
Article history
Received:
August 30, 2013
Revision Received:
January 19, 2014
Accepted:
January 27, 2014
Citation
Maleki, H., Shahriari, S., Labrosse, M., Pibarot, P., and Kadem, L. (April 10, 2014). "An In Vitro Model of Aortic Stenosis for the Assessment of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation." ASME. J Biomech Eng. May 2014; 136(5): 054501. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4026576
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Effect of Internal Mechanical Environment of Porous Scaffolds on Mechano-driven Bone Ingrowth: A Numerical Study
J Biomech Eng (September 2023)
In Silico Mechanical Effort Analysis of the All-On-4 Design Performed With Platform-Switching Distal Short Dental Implants
J Biomech Eng (September 2023)
Related Articles
Steady Flow Hemodynamic and Energy Loss Measurements in Normal and Simulated Calcified Tricuspid and Bicuspid Aortic Valves
J Biomech Eng (April,2014)
Hemodynamics of the Mitral Valve Under Edge-to-Edge Repair: An In Vitro Steady Flow Study
J Biomech Eng (May,2009)
Endothelial Responses to Curvature-Induced Flow Patterns in Engineered Cerebral Aneurysms
J Biomech Eng (January,2023)
Computational Study of Hemodynamic Effects of Abnormal E / A Ratio on Left Ventricular Filling
J Biomech Eng (June,2014)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Introduction
A Practical Guide to Avoiding Steam Purity Problems in the Industrial Plant (CRTD-35)
Nuclear Valves
Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Codes, Volume 1, Fifth Edition
ASME Section IV: Rules for the Construction of Heating Boilers
Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Codes, Volume 1, Fifth Edition