This paper proposes a method for comparing data from accelerometers, optical based 3D motion capture systems, and force platforms (FPs) in the context of spatial and temporal differences. Testing method is based on the motion laboratory accreditation test (MLAT), which can be used to test FP and camera based motion capture components of a motion analysis laboratory. This study extends MLAT to include accelerometer data. Accelerometers were attached to a device similar to the MLAT rod. The elevation of the rod from the plane of the floor is computed and compared with the force platform vector orientation and the rod orientation obtained by optical motion capture system. Orientation of the test device is achieved by forming nonlinear equation group, which describes the components of the measured accelerations. Solution for this equation group is estimated by using the Gauss–Newton method. This expanded MLAT procedure can be used in the laboratory setting were either FP, camera based motion capture, or any other motion capture system is used along with accelerometer measurements.

1.
Cappozzo
,
A.
,
Croce
,
U. D.
,
Leardini
,
A.
, and
Chiari
,
L.
, 2005, “
Human Movement Analysis Using Stereophotogrammetry—Part 1: Theoretical Background
,”
Gait and Posture
0966-6362,
21
(
2
), pp.
186
196
.
2.
Moe-Nilssen
,
R.
, 1998, “
A New Method for Evaluating Motor Control in Gait Under Real-Life Environmental Conditions. Part 2: Gait Analysis
,”
Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon)
0268-0033,
13
(
4–5
), pp.
328
335
.
3.
Selles
,
R. W.
,
Formanoy
,
M. A. G.
,
Bussmann
,
J. B. J.
,
Janssens
,
P. J.
, and
Stam
,
H. J.
, 2005, “
Automated Estimation of Initial and Terminal Contact Timing Using Accelerometers; Development and Validation in Transtibial Amputees and Controls
,”
IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng.
1534-4320,
13
(
1
), pp.
81
88
.
4.
Mayagoitia
,
R. E.
,
Lotters
,
J. C.
,
Veltink
,
P. H.
, and
Hermens
,
H.
, 2002, “
Standing Balance Evaluation Using a Triaxial Accelerometer
,”
Gait and Posture
0966-6362,
16
(
1
), pp.
55
59
.
5.
Moe-Nilssen
,
R.
, and
Helbostad
,
J. L.
, 2002, “
Trunk Accelerometry as a Measure of Balance Control During Quiet Standing
,”
Gait and Posture
0966-6362,
16
(
1
), pp.
60
68
.
6.
Zijlstra
,
W.
, and
Hof
,
A. L.
, 2003, “
Assessment of Spatio-Temporal Gait Parameters From Trunk Accelerations During Human Walking
,”
Gait and Posture
0966-6362,
18
(
2
), pp.
1
10
.
7.
Willemsen
,
A. T.
,
Frigo
,
C.
, and
Boom
,
H. B.
, 1991, “
Lower Extremity Angle Measurement With Accelerometers—Error and Sensitivity Analysis
,”
IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.
0018-9294,
38
(
12
), pp.
1186
1193
.
8.
Willemsen
,
A. T.
,
Van Alst
,
J. A.
, and
Boom
,
H. B.
, 1990, “
Real-Time Gait Assessment Utilizing a New Way of Accelerometry
,”
J. Biomech.
0021-9290,
23
(
8
), pp.
859
863
.
9.
Holden
,
J. P.
,
Selbie
,
W. S.
, and
Stanhope
,
S. J.
, 2003, “
A Proposed Test to Support the Clinical Movement Analysis Laboratory Accreditation Process
,”
Gait and Posture
0966-6362,
17
(
3
), pp.
205
213
.
10.
Liikavainio
,
T.
,
Bragge
,
T.
,
Hakkarainen
,
M.
,
Jurvelin
,
J. S.
,
Karjalainen
,
P. A.
, and
Arokoski
,
J. P.
, 2007, “
Reproducibility of Loading Measurements With Skin-Mounted Accelerometers During Walking
,”
Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil.
0003-9993,
88
(
7
), pp.
907
915
.
11.
Lawson
,
C. L.
, and
Hanson
,
R.
, 1995,
Solving Least Squares Problems
,
SIAM
.
12.
Wilson
,
H. B.
,
Turcotte
,
L. H.
, and
Halpern
,
D.
, 2003,
Advanced Mathematics and Mechanics Applications Using MATLAB
,
3rd ed.
,
Chapman and Hall
,
London
.
13.
Oppenheim
,
A. V.
, and
Schafer
,
R. W.
, 2010,
Discrete-Time Signal Processing
,
3rd ed.
,
Pearson
.
You do not currently have access to this content.