Wearable hip protectors represent a promising strategy for preventing hip fractures. However, there is lack of agreement on biomechanical testing standards and subsequent uncertainty about the ability of hip protectors to attenuate impact force during a fall. To address this issue, we designed a fall impact simulator that incorporated a “biofidelic” surrogate pelvis, which matched the surface geometry and soft tissue stiffness measured in elderly women (n=15). We then used this system to measure the attenuation in peak femoral neck force provided by two commercially available soft shell protectors (Safehip Soft and Hipsaver) and one rigid shell protector (Safehip Classic). Finally, we examined how the force attenuation provided by each protector was influenced by systematic changes in fall severity (impact velocity), body size (pelvis size), and soft tissue stiffness. With the biofidelic pelvis, the force attenuation averaged over all impact velocities was 27% for Safehip Soft, 17% for Safehip Classic, and 19% for Hipsaver. However, the rank order of hip protectors (and especially the performance of Safehip Classic) varied with the test conditions. Safehip Classic attenuated force by 33% during a low velocity (1ms) fall, but only by 8% for a high velocity (4ms) fall. In the latter condition, improved attenuation was provided by the soft shell hip protectors (19% by Safehip Soft and 21% by Hipsaver). As soft tissue stiffness increased from softest to most rigid, the attenuation provided by Safehip Classic increased 2.9-fold (from 26% to 76%), while Safehip Soft increased 1.7-fold (from 36% to 60%) and Hipsaver increased 1.1-fold (from 36% to 38%). As pelvis size decreased from largest to smallest, the attenuation provided by Safehip Classic increased 8-fold, but for a high velocity fall and moderate tissue stiffness, never exceeded that provided by Safehip Soft and Hipsaver. Our results indicate that, under biofidelic testing conditions, the soft shell hip protectors we examined generally provided greater force attenuation (averaging up to 27%) than the hard shell protector. Measured values of force attenuation were highly sensitive to variations in impact velocity, pelvic size, and pelvic soft tissue stiffness. This indicates the need to develop international testing standards to guide market approval, the selection of protectors for clinical trials, and the design of improved hip protectors.

1.
Papadimitropoulos
,
E. A.
,
Coyte
,
P. C.
,
Josse
,
R. G.
, and
Greenwood
,
C. E.
, 1997, “
Current and Projected Rates of Hip Fracture in Canada
,”
CMAJ
0820-3946,
157
(
10
), pp.
1357
1363
.
2.
Empana
,
J. P.
,
Dargent-Molina
,
P.
, and
Breart
,
G.
, 2004, “
Effect of Hip Fracture on Mortality in Elderly Women: The EPIDOS Prospective Study
,”
J. Am. Geriatr. Soc.
0002-8614,
52
(
5
), pp.
685
690
.
3.
Wolinsky
,
F. D.
,
Fitzgerald
,
J. F.
, and
Stump
,
T. E.
, 1997, “
The Effect of Hip Fracture on Mortality, Hospitalization, and Functional Status: A Prospective Study
,”
Am. J. Public Health
0090-0036,
87
(
3
), pp.
398
403
.
4.
Jaglal
,
S. B.
,
Sherry
,
P. G.
, and
Schatzker
,
J.
, 1996, “
The Impact and Consequences of Hip Fracture in Ontario
,”
Can. J. Surg.
0008-428X,
39
(
2
), pp.
105
111
.
5.
Wiktorowicz
,
M. E.
,
Goeree
,
R.
,
Papaioannou
,
A.
,
Adachi
,
J. D.
, and
Papadimitropoulos
,
E.
, 2001, “
Economic Implications of Hip Fracture: Health Service Use, Institutional Care and Cost in Canada
,”
Osteoporosis Int.
0937-941X,
12
(
4
), pp.
271
278
.
6.
Sawka
,
A. M.
,
Boulos
,
P.
,
Beattie
,
K.
,
Thabane
,
L.
,
Papaioannou
,
A.
,
Gafni
,
A.
,
Cranney
,
A.
,
Zytaruk
,
N.
,
Hanley
,
D. A.
, and
Adachi
,
J. D.
, 2005, “
Do Hip Protectors Decrease the Risk of Hip Fracture in Institutional and Community-Dwelling Elderly? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
,”
Osteoporosis Int.
0937-941X,
16
(
12
), pp.
1461
1474
.
7.
Parker
,
M. J.
,
Gillespie
,
W. J.
, and
Gillespie
,
L. D.
, 2006, “
Effectiveness of Hip Protectors for Preventing Hip Fractures in Elderly People: Systematic Review
,”
BMJ
0959-8138,
332
(
7541
), pp.
571
574
.
8.
Kiel
,
D. P.
,
Magaziner
,
J.
,
Zimmerman
,
S.
,
Ball
,
L.
,
Barton
,
B. A.
,
Brown
,
K. M.
,
Stone
,
J. P.
,
Dewkett
,
D.
, and
Birge
,
S. J.
, 2007, “
Efficacy of a Hip Protector to Prevent Hip Fracture in Nursing Home Residents: The HIP PRO Randomized Controlled Trial
,”
JAMA, J. Am. Med. Assoc.
0098-7484,
298
(
4
), pp.
413
422
.
9.
Kannus
,
P.
,
Parkkari
,
J.
,
Niemi
,
S.
,
Pasanen
,
M.
,
Palvanen
,
M.
,
Jarvinen
,
M.
, and
Vuori
,
I.
, 2000, “
Prevention of Hip Fracture in Elderly People With Use of a Hip Protector
,”
N. Engl. J. Med.
0028-4793,
343
(
21
), pp.
1506
1513
.
10.
Derler
,
S.
,
Spierings
,
A. B.
, and
Schmitt
,
K. U.
, 2005, “
Anatomical Hip Model for the Mechanical Testing of Hip Protectors
,”
Med. Eng. Phys.
1350-4533,
27
(
6
), pp.
475
485
.
11.
Kannus
,
P.
,
Parkkari
,
J.
, and
Poutala
,
J.
, 1999, “
Comparison of Force Attenuation Properties of Four Different Hip Protectors Under Simulated Falling Conditions in the Elderly: An In Vitro Biomechanical Study
,”
Bone
,
25
(
2
), pp.
229
235
.
12.
Mills
,
N. J.
, 1996, “
The Biomechanics of Hip Protectors
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part H: J. Eng. Med.
0954-4119,
210
(
4
), pp.
259
266
.
13.
Robinovitch
,
S. N.
,
Hayes
,
W. C.
, and
McMahon
,
T. A.
, 1995, “
Energy-Shunting Hip Padding System Attenuates Femoral Impact Force in a Simulated Fall
,”
ASME J. Biomech. Eng.
0148-0731,
117
(
4
), pp.
409
413
.
14.
van Schoor
,
N. M.
,
van der Veen
,
A. J.
,
Schaap
,
L. A.
,
Smit
,
T. H.
, and
Lips
,
P.
, 2006, “
Biomechanical Comparison of Hard and Soft Hip Protectors, and the Influence of Soft Tissue
,”
Bone
,
39
(
2
), pp.
401
407
.
15.
Nabhani
,
F.
, and
Bamford
,
J.
, 2002, “
Mechanical Testing of Hip Protectors
,”
J. Mater. Process. Technol.
0924-0136,
124
(
3
), pp.
311
318
.
16.
Minns
,
J.
,
Dodd
,
C.
,
Gardner
,
R.
,
Bamford
,
J.
, and
Nabhani
,
F.
, 2004, “
Assessing the Safety and Effectiveness of Hip Protectors
,”
Nurs. Stand
0029-6570,
18
(
39
), pp.
33
38
.
17.
Robinovitch
,
S. N.
,
Hayes
,
W. C.
, and
McMahon
,
T. A.
, 1997, “
Distribution of Contact Force During Impact to the Hip
,”
Ann. Biomed. Eng.
0090-6964,
25
(
3
), pp.
499
508
.
18.
Robinovitch
,
S. N.
,
Hayes
,
W. C.
, and
McMahon
,
T. A.
, 1997, “
Predicting the Impact Response of a Nonlinear Single-Degree-of-Freedom Shock-Absorbing System From the Measured Step Response
,”
ASME J. Biomech. Eng.
0148-0731,
119
(
3
), pp.
221
227
.
19.
Feldman
,
F.
, and
Robinovitch
,
S. N.
, 2007, “
Reducing Hip Fracture Risk During Sideways Falls: Evidence in Young Adults of the Protective Effects of Impact to the Hands and Stepping
,”
J. Biomech.
0021-9290,
40
(
12
), pp.
2612
2618
.
20.
Laing
,
A. C.
, and
Robinovitch
,
S. N.
, 2008, “
Effect of Soft Shell Hip Protectors on Pressure Distribution to the Hip During Sideways Falls
,”
Osteoporosis Int.
0937-941X,
19
(
7
), pp.
1067
1075
.
21.
Wiener
,
S. L.
,
Andersson
,
G. B.
,
Nyhus
,
L. M.
, and
Czech
,
J.
, 2002, “
Force Reduction by an External Hip Protector on the Human Hip After Falls
,”
Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.
0009-921X,
398
, pp.
157
168
.
22.
van Schoor
,
N. M.
,
Smit
,
J. H.
,
Twisk
,
J. W.
,
Bouter
,
L. M.
, and
Lips
,
P.
, 2003, “
Prevention of Hip Fractures by External Hip Protectors: A Randomized Controlled Trial
,”
JAMA, J. Am. Med. Assoc.
0098-7484,
289
(
15
), pp.
1957
1962
.
23.
Cameron
,
I. D.
,
Venman
,
J.
,
Kurrle
,
S. E.
,
Lockwood
,
K.
,
Birks
,
C.
,
Cumming
,
R. G.
,
Quine
,
S.
, and
Bashford
,
G.
, 2001, “
Hip Protectors in Aged-Care Facilities: A Randomized Trial of Use by Individual Higher-Risk Residents
,”
Age Ageing
0002-0729,
30
(
6
), pp.
477
481
.
24.
Mills
,
N. J.
, 2007,
Polymer Foams Handbook: Engineering and Biomechanics Applications and Design Guide
,
Elsevier Ltd.
,
Oxford, UK
, pp.
403
424
.
25.
Cavanaugh
,
J. M.
,
Walilko
,
J. T.
,
Malhotra
,
A.
,
Zhu
,
Y.
, and
King
,
A. I.
, 1990, “
Biomechanical Response and Injury Tolerance of the Pelvis in Twelve Sled Side Impacts
,”
Proceedings of the 34th Stapp Car Crash Conference
,
Society of Automotive Engineers
,
Warrendale, PA
, pp.
1
12
.
26.
Etheridge
,
B. S.
,
Beason
,
D. P.
,
Lopez
,
R. R.
,
Alonso
,
J. E.
,
McGwin
,
G.
, and
Eberhardt
,
A. W.
, 2005, “
Effects of Trochanteric Soft Tissues and Bone Density on Fracture of the Female Pelvis in Experimental Side Impacts
,”
Ann. Biomed. Eng.
0090-6964,
33
(
2
), pp.
248
254
.
27.
Parkkari
,
J.
,
Kannus
,
P.
,
Heikkila
,
J.
,
Poutala
,
J.
,
Heinonen
,
A.
,
Sievanen
,
H.
, and
Vuori
,
I.
, 1997, “
Impact Experiments of an External Hip Protector in Young Volunteers
,”
Calcif. Tissue Int.
0171-967X,
60
(
4
), pp.
354
357
.
28.
Laing
,
A. C.
,
Tootoonchi
,
I.
,
Hulme
,
P. A.
, and
Robinovitch
,
S. N.
, 2006, “
Effect of Compliant Flooring on Impact Force During Falls on the Hip
,”
J. Orthop. Res.
0736-0266,
24
(
7
), pp.
1405
1411
.
29.
Robinovitch
,
S. N.
,
Chiu
,
J.
,
Sandler
,
R.
, and
Liu
,
Q.
, 2000, “
Impact Severity in Self-Initiated Sits and Falls Associates With Center-of-Gravity Excursion During Descent
,”
J. Biomech.
0021-9290,
33
(
7
), pp.
863
870
.
30.
Robinovitch
,
S. N.
,
McMahon
,
T. A.
, and
Hayes
,
W. C.
, 1995, “
Force Attenuation in Trochanteric Soft Tissues During Impact From a Fall
,”
J. Orthop. Res.
0736-0266,
13
(
6
), pp.
956
962
.
31.
Lauritzen
,
J. B.
, and
Askegaard
,
V.
, 1992, “
Protection Against Hip Fractures by Energy Absorption
,”
Dan. Med. Bull.
0907-8916,
39
(
1
), pp.
91
93
.
32.
Eckstein
,
F.
,
Wunderer
,
C.
,
Boehm
,
H.
,
Kuhn
,
V.
,
Priemel
,
M.
,
Link
,
T. M.
, and
Lochmuller
,
E. M.
, 2004, “
Reproducibility and Side Differences of Mechanical Tests for Determining the Structural Strength of the Proximal Femur
,”
J. Bone Miner. Res.
0884-0431,
19
(
3
), pp.
379
385
.
33.
Bouxsein
,
M. L.
,
Szulc
,
P.
,
Munoz
,
F.
,
Thrall
,
E.
,
Sornay-Rendu
,
E.
, and
Delmas
,
P. D.
, 2007, “
Contribution of Trochanteric Soft Tissues to Fall Force Estimates, the Factor of Risk, and Prediction of Hip Fracture Risk
,”
J. Bone Miner. Res.
0884-0431,
22
(
6
), pp.
825
831
.
34.
Kannus
,
P.
,
Parkkari
,
J.
, and
Khan
,
K.
, 2003, “
Hip Protectors Need an Evidence Base
,”
Lancet
0140-6736,
362
(
9391
), pp.
1168
1169
.
You do not currently have access to this content.