Third-generation mechanical analogue bone models and synthetic analogue cortical bone materials manufactured by Pacific Research Laboratories, Inc. (PRL) are popular tools for use in mechanical testing of various orthopedic implants and biomaterials. A major issue with these models is that the current third-generation epoxy–short fiberglass based composite used as the cortical bone substitute is prone to crack formation and failure in fatigue or repeated quasistatic loading of the model. The purpose of the present study was to compare the tensile and fracture mechanics properties of the current baseline (established PRL “third-generation” E-glass–fiber–epoxy) composite analogue for cortical bone to a new composite material formulation proposed for use as an enhanced fourth-generation cortical bone analogue material. Standard tensile, plane strain fracture toughness, and fatigue crack propagation rate tests were performed on both the third- and fourth-generation composite material formulations using standard ASTM test techniques. Injection molding techniques were used to create random fiber orientation in all test specimens. Standard dog-bone style tensile specimens were tested to obtain ultimate tensile strength and stiffness. Compact tension fracture toughness specimens were utilized to determine plane strain fracture toughness values. Reduced thickness compact tension specimens were also used to determine fatigue crack propagation rate behavior for the two material groups. Literature values for the same parameters for human cortical bone were compared to results from the third- and fourth-generation cortical analogue bone materials. Tensile properties of the fourth-generation material were closer to that of average human cortical bone than the third-generation material. Fracture toughness was significantly increased by 48% in the fourth-generation composite as compared to the third-generation analogue bone. The threshold stress intensity to propagate the crack was much higher for the fourth-generation material than for the third-generation composite. Even at the higher stress intensity threshold, the fatigue crack propagation rate was significantly decreased in the fourth-generation composite compared to the third-generation composite. These results indicate that the bone analogue models made from the fourth-generation analogue cortical bone material may exhibit better performance in fracture and longer fatigue lives than similar models made of third-generation analogue cortical bone material. Further fatigue testing of the new composite material in clinically relevant use of bone models is still required for verification of these results. Biomechanical test models using the superior fourth-generation cortical analogue material are currently in development.

1.
Cristofolini
,
L.
,
Viceconti
,
M.
, and
Cappello
,
A.
, 1996, “
Mechanical Validation of Whole Bone Composite Femur Models
,”
J. Biomech.
0021-9290,
29
(
4
), pp.
525
535
.
2.
Sawbones® Worldwide
2005, Pacific Research Laboratories, Inc., Vashon, WA, https://secure.sawbones.com/products/bio/composite.asphttps://secure.sawbones.com/products/bio/composite.asp.
3.
Heiner
,
A. D.
, and
Brown
,
T. D.
, 2001, “
Structure Properties of a New Design of Composite Replicate Femurs and Tibias
,”
J. Biomech.
0021-9290,
34
, pp.
773
781
.
4.
Verdonschot
,
N.
,
Barink
,
M.
,
Stolk
,
J.
,
Gardeniers
,
J. W. M.
, and
Schreurs
,
B. W.
, 2002, “
Do Unloading Periods Affect Migration Characteristics of Cemented Femoral Components? An In Vitro Evaluation With the Exeter Stem
,”
Acta Orthop. Belg.
0001-6462,
68
, pp.
348
355
.
5.
Friis
,
E. A.
,
Pence
,
C. D.
,
Graber
,
C. D.
, and
Montoya
,
J. A.
, 2002,
Mechanical Analogue Model of the Human Lumbar Spine: Development and Initial Evaluation, Spinal Implants: Are We Evaluating Them Appropriately?
,
ASTM STP 143
,
M. N.
Melkerson
,
S. L.
Griffith
, and
J. S.
Kirkpatrick
, eds.,
ASTM International
, West Conshohocken, PA, pp.
143
154
.
6.
Whitaker
,
C.
,
Czuwala
,
P. J.
,
McQueen
,
D. A.
,
Cooke
,
F. W.
, and
Friis
,
E. A.
, 2003, “
Subsidence Rate of Polished Femoral Prostheses: Effect of Bone Cement Porosity
,” American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons, New Orleans, LA, Poster No. P063.
7.
Oh
,
I.
, and
Harris
,
W. H.
, 1978, “
Proximal Strain Distribution in the Loaded Femur. An In Vitro Comparison of the Distributions in the Intact Femur and After Insertion of Different Hip-Replacement Femoral Components
,”
J. Bone Jt. Surg., Am. Vol.
0021-9355,
60
(
1
), pp.
75
85
.
8.
Bergh
,
M. S.
,
Muir
,
P.
,
Markel
,
M. D.
, and
Manley
,
P. A.
, 2004, “
Femoral Bone Adaptation to Stable Long-Term Cemented Total Hip Arthroplasty in Dogs
,”
Vet. Surg.
0161-3499,
33
(
3
), pp.
214
220
.
9.
Brown
,
T. E.
,
Larson
,
B.
,
Shen
,
F.
, and
Moskal
,
J. T.
, 2002, “
Thigh Pain after Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty: Evaluation and Management
,”
J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg.
1067-151X,
10
(
6
), pp.
385
392
.
10.
Draenert
,
K. D.
,
Draenert
,
Y. I.
,
Krauspe
,
R.
, and
Bettin
,
D.
, 2005, “
Strain Adaptive Bone Remodeling in Total Joint Replacement
,”
Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.
0009-921X,
430
, pp.
12
27
.
11.
Lavernia
,
C.
,
D’Apuzzo
,
M.
,
Hernanadez
,
V.
, and
Lee
,
D.
, 2004, “
Thigh Pain in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: The Effect of Elastic Moduli
,”
J. Arthroplasty
0883-5403,
19
(
7/2
), pp.
10
16
.
12.
Markolf
,
K. L.
, and
Amstutz
,
H. C.
, 1980, “
Mechanical Strength of the Femur Following Resurfacing and Conventional Total Hip Replacement Procedures
,”
Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.
0009-921X,
147
, pp.
170
180
.
13.
ASTM
, 2001, “
Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fracture Toughness
,”
Annual Book of ASTM Standards, 03.01, Specification E1820-01
,
West Conshohocken, PA, pp.
1031
1076
.
14.
ASTM
, 2001, “
Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fatigue Crack Growth Rates
,”
Annual Book of ASTM Standards, 03.01, Specification E647-00
,
West Conshohocken, PA, pp.
603
644
.
15.
ASTM
, 2001, “
Standard Test Method for Plane-Strain Fracture Toughness of Metallic Material
,”
Annual Book of ASTM Standards, 03.01, Specification E399-90(1997)
,
West Conshohocken, PA, pp.
443
473
.
16.
ASTM
, 2005, “
Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics
,”
Annual Book of ASTM Standards, 08.01, Specification D638-03
,
West Conshohocken, PA, pp.
47
61
.
17.
Burstein
,
A. H.
,
Reilly
,
D. T.
, and
Martens
,
M.
, 1976, “
Aging of Bone Tissue: Mechanical Properties
,”
J. Bone Jt. Surg., Am. Vol.
0021-9355,
58
(
1
), pp.
82
86
.
18.
Reilly
,
D. T.
, and
Burstein
,
A. H.
, 1975, “
The Elastic and Ultimate Properties of Compact Bone Tissue
,”
J. Biomech.
0021-9290,
8
(
6
), pp.
393
405
.
19.
Wang
,
X.
, and
Puram
,
S.
, 2004, “
The Toughness of Cortical Bone and its Relationship with Age
,”
Ann. Biomed. Eng.
0090-6964,
32
(
1
), pp.
123
135
.
20.
Yang
,
Q. D.
,
Cox
,
B. N.
,
Nalla
,
R. K.
, and
Ritchie
,
R. O.
, 2006, “
Re-evaluating the Toughness of Human Cortical Bone
,”
Bone (N.Y.)
8756-3282,
38
(
6
), pp.
878
887
.
You do not currently have access to this content.