The Ahmed™ glaucoma valve (AGV) is a popular glaucoma drainage device, allowing maintenance of normal intraocular pressure in patients with reduced trabecular outflow facility. The uniquely attractive feature of the AGV, in contrast to other available drainage devices, is its variable resistance in response to changes in flow rate. As a result of this variable resistance, the AGV maintains a pressure drop between 7 and $12mmHg$ for a wide range of aqueous humor flow rates. In this paper, we demonstrate that the nonlinear behavior of the AGV is a direct result of the flexibility of the valve material. Due to the thin geometry of the system, the leaflets of the AGV were modeled using the von Kármán plate theory coupled to a Reynolds lubrication theory model of the aqueous humor flow through the valve. The resulting two-dimensional coupled steady-state partial differential equation system was solved by the finite element method. The Poisson’s ratio of the valve was set to 0.45, and the modulus was regressed to experimental data, giving a best-fit value $4.2MPa$. Simulation results compared favorably with previous experimental studies and our own pressure-drop∕flow-rate data. For an in vitro flow of $1.6μL∕min$, we calculated a pressure drop of $5.8mmHg$ and measured a pressure drop of $5.2±0.4mmHg$. As flow rate was increased, pressure drop rose in a strongly sublinear fashion, with a flow rate of $20μL∕min$ giving a predicted pressure drop of only $10.9mmHg$ and a measured pressure drop of $10.5±1.1mmHg$. The AGV model was then applied to simulate in vivo conditions. For an aqueous humor flow rate of $1.5-3.0μL∕min$, the calculated pressure drops were 5.3 and $6.3mmHg$.

1.
Hart
,
W. M.
, 1992,
,
Mosby Year Book
, St. Louis.
2.
Epstein
,
D. L.
,
Allingham
,
R. R.
, and
Schuman
,
J. S.
, 1997,
Chandler’s and Grant’s Glaucoma
,
4th ed.
Williams and Wilkins
, Baltimore.
3.
Tong
,
L.
,
Frazao
,
K.
,
LaBree
,
L.
, and
Varma
,
R.
, 2003, “
Intraocular Pressure Control and Complications with Two-Stage Insertion of the Baerveldt Implant
,”
Ophthalmology
0161-6420,
110
(
2
), pp.
353
358
.
4.
Prata
,
J. A.
,
Mermoud
,
A.
,
LaBree
,
L.
, and
Minckler
,
D. S.
, 1995, “
In Vitro and In Vivo Flow Characteristics of Glaucoma Drainage Implants
,”
Ophthalmology
0161-6420,
102
, pp.
894
904
.
5.
Eisenberg
,
D. L.
,
Koo
,
E. Y.
,
Hafner
,
G.
, and
Schuman
,
J. S.
, 1999, “
In Vitro Flow Properties of Glaucoma Implant Devices
,”
Ophthalmic Surg. Lasers
1082-3069,
30
(
8
), pp.
662
667
.
6.
Francis
,
B. A.
,
Cortes
,
A.
,
Chen
,
J.
, and
,
J. A.
, 1998, “
Characteristics of Glaucoma Drainage Implants during Dynamics and Steady-State Flow Conditions
,”
Ophthalmology
0161-6420,
105
, pp.
1708
1714
.
7.
Bird
,
R. B.
,
Stewart
,
W. E.
, and
Lightfoot
,
E. N.
, 1960,
Transport Phenomena
,
Wiley
, New York.
8.
Wilson
,
M. R.
,
Mendis
,
U.
,
Smith
,
S. D.
, and
Paliwal
,
A.
, 2000, “
Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implant Vs Trabeculectomy in the Surgical Treatment of Glaucoma
,”
Am. J. Ophthalmol.
0002-9394,
130
, pp.
267
273
.
9.
Fung
,
Y. C.
, and
Tong
,
P.
, 2001,
Classical and Computational Solid Mechanics
,
World Scientific
, Singapore.
10.
Malvern
,
L. E.
, 1969,
Introduction to the Mechanics of a Continuous Medium
,
Prentice-Hall Inc.
, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
11.
Panton
,
R. L.
, 1992,
Incompressible Flow
,
Wiley
, New York.
12.
Stay
,
M. S.
, and
Barocas
,
V. H.
, 2004, “
Coupled Fluid-Solid Thin-Film Analysis of Microscale Pumping
.”
13.
,
Y.
, and
Schultz
,
M. H.
, 1986, “
Gmres: A Generalized Minimal Residual Algorithm for Solving Nonsymmetric Linear Systems
,”
SIAM (Soc. Ind. Appl. Math.) J. Sci. Stat. Comput.
0196-5204,
7
, pp.
856
869
.
14.
Beck
,
A. D.
,
Sharon
,
F.
,
Kammer
,
J.
, and
Jin
,
J.
, 2003, “
Aqueous Shunt Devices Compared with Trabeculectomy with Mitomycin-C for Children in the First Two Years of Life
,”
Am. J. Ophthalmol.
0002-9394,
136
(
6
), pp.
994
1000
.
15.
Nouri-Mahdavi
,
K.
, and
Caprioli
,
J.
, 2003, “
Evaluation of the Hypertensive Phase After Insertion of the Ahmed Glaucoma Valve
,”
Am. J. Ophthalmol.
0002-9394,
136
(
6
), pp.
1001
1008
.