The technique of surgical repair for zone two flexor tendon injuries has been debated extensively throughout the years, yet adhesion formation, suture rupture, and suture locking on the pulley edge remain possible consequences of a poor repair. The partially lacerated tendon is especially challenging to treat since there can be justification for not intervening surgically. In a partial laceration canine model we measured failure load and suture gap formation for tendons repaired with the Lee, modified four-strand Savage, Kessler, modified Kessler, and Augmented Becker core suture techniques and with a simple running peripheral suture. The modified Kessler (106.3 N, SD 18.8 N) and modified Savage (108.2 N, SD 19.9 N) repair techniques had a significantly higher failure load than the Lee (85.0 N, SD 20.6 N) suture method while there were no differences among the other techniques. There were no significant differences in resistance to gap formation among the repair techniques, with the mean values ranging from 38.9 N/mm (SD 15.7 N/mm) using the simple running suture to 53.2 N/mm (SD 25.8 N/mm) with the Kessler repair. The mean load to produce a 1.5 mm repair site gap ranged from 71.1 N (SD 21.5 N) in the Lee repair to 91.3 N (SD 22.2 N) in the Augmented Becker repair although there were no significant differences among repair methods. All repair methods were much weaker than tendons left unrepaired (184.7 N, SD 41.3 N). [S0148-0731(00)00706-8]
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
December 2000
Technical Papers
Comparison of Mechanical Properties of Various Suture Repair Techniques in a Partially Lacerated Tendon
Mark E. Zobitz,
Mark E. Zobitz
Orthopedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Mayo Clinic/Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN 55905
E-mail: zobitz.mark@mayo.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Chunfeng Zhao,
Chunfeng Zhao
Orthopedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Mayo Clinic/Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN 55905
E-mail: Zhao.Chunfeng@mayo.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Peter C. Amadio,
Peter C. Amadio
Department of Orthopedics, Mayo Clinic/Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN 55905
Search for other works by this author on:
Kai-Nan An
Kai-Nan An
Orthopedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Mayo Clinic/Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN 55905
Search for other works by this author on:
Mark E. Zobitz
E-mail: zobitz.mark@mayo.edu
Orthopedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Mayo Clinic/Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN 55905
Chunfeng Zhao
E-mail: Zhao.Chunfeng@mayo.edu
Orthopedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Mayo Clinic/Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN 55905
Peter C. Amadio
Department of Orthopedics, Mayo Clinic/Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN 55905
Kai-Nan An
Orthopedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Mayo Clinic/Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN 55905
Contributed by the Bioengineering Division for publication in the JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING. Manuscript received by the Bioengineering Division July 28, 1999; revised manuscript received July 24, 2000. Associate Technical Editor: L. J. Soslowsky.
J Biomech Eng. Dec 2000, 122(6): 604-607 (4 pages)
Published Online: July 24, 2000
Article history
Received:
July 28, 1999
Revised:
July 24, 2000
Citation
Zobitz, M. E., Zhao, C., Amadio, P. C., and An, K. (July 24, 2000). "Comparison of Mechanical Properties of Various Suture Repair Techniques in a Partially Lacerated Tendon ." ASME. J Biomech Eng. December 2000; 122(6): 604–607. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1324668
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Effect of Collagen Fiber Tortuosity Distribution on the Mechanical Response of Arterial Tissues
J Biomech Eng (February 2025)
Related Articles
Determination of Optimal Graft Lengths for Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction—A Theoretical Analysis
J Biomech Eng (April,2003)
Functional Tissue Engineering: The Role of Biomechanics
J Biomech Eng (December,2000)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Surface Analysis and Tools
Tribology of Mechanical Systems: A Guide to Present and Future Technologies
Synthesis and Characterization of Carboxymethyl Chitosan Based Hybrid Biopolymer Scaffold
International Conference on Mechanical and Electrical Technology, 3rd, (ICMET-China 2011), Volumes 1–3
Introduction
Ultrasonic Methods for Measurement of Small Motion and Deformation of Biological Tissues for Assessment of Viscoelasticity