The objective of the current study was to develop an in vitro testing protocol to evaluate semi-rigid pedicle screw devices. A corpectomy model protocol exists to evaluate rigid spinal implants; however, semi-rigid devices are contraindicated for this condition. This paper describes a technique that simulates more closely the conditions a semi-rigid device would see in vivo. Finally, the new testing protocol is used to evaluate the DDS® pedicle screw-cable system. Benefits and shortcomings of the new protocol are discussed.
Issue Section:
Technical Brief
1.
Geiger, J. M., and Melkerson, M. N., “Static and dynamic test method for spinal implant assemblies in a corpectomy model,” ASTM Draft F-04.35.1, June 14, 1994.
2.
Gertzbein
S. D.
Betz
R.
Clements
D.
Errico
T.
Hammerberg
K.
Robbins
S.
Sheperd
E.
Weber
A.
Kerina
M.
Albin
J.
Wolk
D.
Ensor
K.
Semirigid instrumentation in the management of lumber spinal conditions combined with circumferential fusion; a multicenter study
,” Spine
, Vol. 21
, 1996
, pp. 1918
–1926
.3.
Goel, V. K., Hoffman, H. E., and Pfeiffer, M., “Evaluation of the DDS® fixation system,” 1995 (personal communication).
4.
Grevitt
M. P.
Gardner
A. D. H.
Spilsbury
J.
Shackleford
I. M.
Baskerville
R.
Pursell
L. M.
Hassaan
A.
Mulholland
R. C.
The Graf stabilisation system: early results in 50 patients
,” Eur. Spine J.
, Vol. 4
, 1995
, pp. 169
–175
.5.
Yamagata
M.
Kitahara
H.
Minami
S.
Takahashi
K.
Isobe
K.
Moriya
H.
Tamaki
T.
Mechanical stability of the pedicle screw fixation systems for the lumbar spine
,” Spine
, Vol. 17
, 1992
, pp. S51–S54
S51–S54
.
This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright © 1997
by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
You do not currently have access to this content.