Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
ASTM Selected Technical Papers
Pesticide Formulation and Delivery Systems: 42nd Volume, Building the Future of Agrochemicals for 2030 and Beyond
Editor
Krista Turpin
Krista Turpin
Symposium Chair and STP Editor
1
Stepan Company
,
Winder, GA,
US
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN:
978-0-8031-7749-9
No. of Pages:
140
Publisher:
ASTM International
Publication date:
2024

Soil surfactants are important for water management on golf courses, particularly sand-based putting greens. However, understanding functional differences among products is challenging for many practitioners. Product transparency is lacking, creating a need to evaluate turfgrass soil surfactants on an active-ingredient basis. For amenity turfgrass, nonionic block copolymers (poloxamers) are the largest and most widely used soil-surfactant chemical category. The objective of this research was to compare individual poloxamers for their effectiveness as stand-alone soil surfactants based on soil volumetric water content (VWC) and turfgrass quality. A 2-year study was conducted on a sand-based creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera L.) putting green. The study used a two-factor split-plot design arranged as a randomized complete block with four replications. Irrigation was the whole-plot factor, with two levels: 60% and 80% evapotranspiration replacement. Six soil-surfactant treatments were applied to individual split plots and included four structurally related poloxamers (181, 182, 184, and 188), an untreated control (UC), and a commercial standard (CS) (an alkyl-terminated block copolymer). Poloxamers all had the same molecular-weight hydrophobe, but each contained a different hydrophile percentage. Surfactants were applied every 28 days and immediately irrigated with 5 mm water. VWC was measured across 3.8 and 7.6 cm using time-domain reflectometry. Turfgrass quality was assessed visually (on a scale from 1 to 9) and through digital-image analysis. Results indicated that above-ground turfgrass quality did not necessarily reflect below-ground VWC. Across variable weather conditions, Poloxamers 181 and 182, which had the lowest hydrophile percentages, were not significantly different from the CS, whereas Poloxamer 188, which had the highest hydrophile percentage, was not significantly different from the UC. These results indicated that longer hydrophile chains may reduce the perceived effectiveness of turfgrass soil surfactants in sand-based putting greens. Results also demonstrated the need to further explore the structure-function relationships of turfgrass soil-surfactants.

1.
Shaddox
T.
and
Unruh
J.B.
, “
Water Management Study Finds Water Use Down by 29% at U.S. Golf Facilities
,”
Golf Course Management
90
, no.
8
(
2022
): 58–69.
2.
Whitlark
B.
,
Umeda
K.
,
Leinauer
B.
, and
Serena
M.
, “
Considerations with Water for Turfgrass in Arid Environments
,” in
Achieving Sustainable Turfgrass Management
, ed.
Fidanza
M.
(
Cambridge, UK
:
Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing
,
2023
), 599–624.
3.
USGA Recommendations for a Method of Putting Green Construction
(
Liberty Corner, NJ
:
United States Golf Association
,
2018
).
4.
Song
E.
,
Pan
X.
,
Kremer
F.J.
,
Goyne
K.W.
,
Anderson
S.H.
, and
Xiong
X.
, “
Influence of Repeated Application of Wetting Agents on Soil Water Repellency and Microbial Community
,”
Sustainability
11
, no.
16
(
2019
): 4505,
5.
McCarty
L.B.
,
Best Golf Course Management Practices
(
Upper Saddle River, NJ
:
Prentice Hall
,
2001
).
6.
Gelernter
W.D.
,
Stowell
L.J.
,
Johnson
M.E.
,
Brown
C.D.
, and
Beditz
J.F.
, “
Documenting Trends in Water Use and Conservation Practices on U.S. Golf Courses
,”
Crop, Forage & Turfgrass Management
1
, no.
1
(
2015
): 1–10.
7.
Jacobs
P.
and
Barden
A.
, “
Factors to Consider When Developing a Wetting Agent Program: A One-Size-Fits-All Approach to Developing a Wetting Agent Program Is Not Possible
,”
USGA Green Section Record
56
, no.
9
(
2018
): 1–6.
8.
DeBoer
E.J.
,
Karcher
D.E.
,
McCalla
J.H.
, and
Richardson
M.D.
, “
Effect of Late-Fall Wetting Agent Application on Winter Survival of Ultradwarf Bermudagrass Putting Greens
,”
Crop, Forage & Turfgrass Management
6
, no.
1
(
2020
): e20035,
9.
Zontek
S.
and
Kostka
S.
, “
Understanding the Different Wetting Agent Chemistries: A Surfactant Is a Wetting Agent, but a Wetting Agent May Not Be a Surfactant. Surprised?
USGA Green Section Record
50
, no.
15
(
2012
): 1–6.
10.
Hutchens
W.J.
, “
Effect of Irrigation Amount and Soil Surfactants on Fungicide Movement and Efficacy in Turfgrass Systems
” (PhD diss.,
North Carolina State University
,
2018
).
11.
Fidanza
M.
,
Kostka
S.
, and
Bigelow
C.
, “
Communication of Soil Water Repellency Causes, Problems, and Solutions of Intensively Managed Amenity Turf from 2000 to 2020
,”
Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics
68
, no.
4
(
2020
): 306–312.
12.
Obear
G.
, “
Making Sense of Wetting Agent Labels, Claims, and Standards
,”
Exacto Inc.
,
2021
, http://web.archive.org/web/20211203095044/https://www.exactoinc.com/blog/2021/02/16/making-sense-of-wetting-agent-labels-claims-and-standards/3
13.
Xiang
M.
,
Schiavon
M.
,
Orlinski
P.
,
Forconi
A.
, and
Baird
J.
, “
Identification of Wetting Agents for Water Conservation on Deficit-Irrigated Hybrid Bermudagrass Fairways
,”
Agronomy Journal
113
, no.
5
(
2021
): 3846–3856.
14.
Clarke
B.
,
Vincelli
P.
,
Koch
P.
, and
Munshaw
G.
,
Chemical Control of Turfgrass Diseases 2020
(
Lexington, KY
:
University of Kentucky Cooperative Extension
,
2019
).
15.
Moore
D.
,
Kostka
S.
,
Lennert
L.
,
Franklin
M.
,
Bially
P.
, and
Moore
R.
, “
The Evolution of Soil Wetting Agents for Managing Water Repellency in Soils
” (poster presentation, ASA, CSSA, SSSA International Annual Meeting,
Indianapolis, IN
, November 14,
2006
).
16.
Performance Chemicals: Pluronic and Tetronic Surfactants
(
Mount Olive, NJ
:
BASF Corporation
,
1996
).
17.
Alexandridis
P.
, “
Poly (Ethylene Oxide)/Poly (Propylene Oxide) Block Copolymer Surfactants
,”
Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science
2
, no.
5
(
1997
): 478–489.
18.
Griffin
W.C.
, “
Classification of Surface-Active Agents by HLB
,”
Journal of the Society of Cosmetic Chemists
1
(
1949
): 311–326.
19.
Kostka
S.J.
and
Bially
P.T.
.
Wetting of water repellent soil by low HLB EO/PO block copolymers and enhancing solubility of the same
. U.S. Patent 7,541,386 B2, filed August 31,
2005
, and issued June 2,
2009
.
20.
Kostka
S.J.
and
Schuermann
G.
.
Enhancing plant productivity by improving the plant growth medium environment with alkyl ethers of methyl oxirane-oxirane copolymer surfactants
. U.S. Patent 7,399,730 B2, filed March 31,
2005
, and issued July 15,
2008
.
21.
Alexandridis
P.
and
Hatton
T.A.
, “
Poly(Ethylene Oxide)-Poly(Propylene Oxide)-Poly(Ethylene Oxide) Block Copolymer Surfactants in Aqueous Solutions and at Interfaces: Thermodynamics, Structure, Dynamics and Modeling
,”
Colloids and Surfaces A: Physiochemical and Engineering Aspects
96
, nos. 1–2 (
1996
): 1–46.
22.
Russo
E.
and
Villa
C.
, “
Poloxamer Hydrogels for Biomedical Applications
,”
Pharmaceutics
11
, no.
12
(
2019
): 671,
23.
Delivering the Future of Clean Product Range Home Care and I&I Solutions North America
(
Florham Park, NJ
:
BASF Corporation
).
24.
Karcher
D.E.
and
Richardson
M.D.
, “
Digital Image Analysis in Turfgrass Research
,” in
Turfgrass: Biology, Use, and Management
, ed.
Stier
J.C.
,
Horgan
B.P.
, and
Bonos
S.A.
(
Madison, WI
:
American Society of Agronomy
,
2013
), 1133–1149.
25.
Leinauer
B.
,
Karcher
D.
,
Barrick
T.
,
Ikemura
Y.
,
Hubble
H.
, and
Makk
J.
, “
Water Repellency Varies with Depth and Season in Sandy Rootzones Treated with Ten Wetting Agents
,”
Applied Turfgrass Science
4
, no.
1
(
2007
): 1–9.
26.
Benard
P.
,
Zarebanadkouki
M.
,
Hedwig
C.
,
Holz
M.
,
Ahmed
M.A.
, and
Carminati
A.
, “
Pore-Scale Distribution of Mucilage Affecting Water Repellency in the Rhizosphere
,”
Vadose Zone Journal
17
, no.
1
(
2018
): 1–9.
27.
Carminati
A.
and
Vetterlein
D.
, “
Plasticity of Rhizosphere Hydraulic Properties as a Key for Efficient Utilization of Scarce Resources
,”
Annals of Botany
112
, no.
2
(
2013
): 277–290.
28.
Fidanza
M.
,
Bigelow
C.
,
Kostka
S.
,
Ervin
E.
,
Gaussoin
R.
,
Rossi
F.
,
Cisar
J.
,
Dinelli
F.D.
,
Pope
J.
, and
Steffel
J.
, “
Advances in Biostimulants in Turfgrass
,” in
Achieving Sustainable Turfgrass Management
, ed.
Fidanza
M.
(
Cambridge, UK
:
Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing
,
2023
), 469–501.
29.
Song
E.
,
Goyne
K.W.
,
Kremer
R.J.
,
Anderson
S.H.
, and
Xiong
X.
, “
Surfactant Chemistry Effects on Organic Matter Removal from Water Repellent Sand
,”
Soil & Water Management & Conservation
82
, no.
5
(
2018
): 1252–1258.
30.
Woods
M.
, “
OM246 Sampling Instructions
,”
Asian Turfgrass Center
(
2021
), http://web.archive.org/save/https://www.asianturfgrass.com/post/om246-sampling-instructions
31.
Throssell
C.
, “
GCSAA-USGA Wetting Agent Evaluation
,”
Golf Course Management
73
, no.
4
(
2005
): 52–91.
32.
O'Brien
D.P.
,
Karcher
D.E.
, and
Richardson
M.D.
, “
Evaluating Putting Green Firmness in Terms of Moisture, Maintenance, and Playability
” (paper presentation, 2018 ASA, CSSA International Annual Meeting,
Baltimore, MD
, November 5,
2018
).
33.
Kostka
S.
and
Fidanza
M.
, “
Soil Surfactant Usage Based on Solid Science
,”
Golf Course Industry
, November 4,
2019
, http://web.archive.org/web/20240405195727/https://www.golfcourseindustry.com/news/soil-surfactant-research-guidance/
34.
Karcher
D.E.
,
Richardson
M.D.
, and
O'Brien
D.P.
, “
How Do Various Wetting Agents Affect Water Movement and Retention in Sand-Based Putting Green Profiles?
” (poster presentation, ASA, CSSA, SSSA International Annual Meeting, virtual, November 10,
2020
).
35.
Kostka
S.
,
Fidanza
M.
, and
Bigelow
C.
, “
The Science Behind Wetting Agent Applications
,” Greenkeeper International (March
2022
): 74–75.
36.
Pioppi
A.
, “
Water Wise Part Two: Getting away from Lush and Green
,”
Golfdom
66
no.
11
(
2010
): 30–32.
37.
Bially
P.T.
,
Kostka
S.J.
, and
Buckman
R.C.
, “
Improving the Infiltration of Water through Repellent Soils Using Synergistic Surfactant Blends Based on Alkyl Glucosides and Ethylene Oxide-Propylene Oxide Block Copolymers
,”
Journal of ASTM International
2
, no.
10
(
2005
): JAI12914,
38.
Shaddox
T.W.
and
Unruh
J.B.
, “
Do Wetting Agents Influence Golf Ball Roll Distance?
HortTechnology
30
, no.
3
(
2020
): 404–410.
39.
Bauer
S.J.
,
Cavanaugh
M.J.
, and
Horgan
B.P.
, “
Wetting Agent Influence on Putting Green Surface Firmness
,”
International Turfgrass Society Research Journal
13
, no.
1
(
2017
): 624–628.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal