Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
ASTM Selected Technical Papers
Standard Guides and Practices that Support the Lubricant Condition Monitoring Industry
Editor
Mindy Villalba
Mindy Villalba
Symposium Chair and STP Editor
1
SGS North America, Inc.
,
Vallejo, CA,
US
Search for other works by this author on:
Lisa Williams
Lisa Williams
Symposium Chair and STP Editor
2
Ametek Spectro Scientific
,
Chelmsford, MA,
US
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN:
978-0-8031-7714-7
No. of Pages:
394
Publisher:
ASTM International
Publication date:
2022

Since its original approval in 1964, the rotating pressure vessel oxidation test (RPVOT; ASTM D2272) has been the primary oxidation performance test for turbine oils. When this test was developed the steam turbine was the primary power-generation equipment in the market, and water levels were commonly in the 1,000-ppm (mg/kg) range. Today those trends have changed. Gas turbines are now the primary power-generation equipment, and water levels are commonly less than 50 ppm (mg/kg)—even for steam turbines. This trend has led to concerns about the performance correlations between the RPVOT (ASTM D2272) and real-life in-service operations. The RPVOT is an oxidation test that uses 20% water as part of the test itself. As ASTM D6224 states: “Some oils may undergo degradation leading to insoluble contaminants and deposit formation prior to reaching the warning limits (for example, the 25 % RPVOT warning limit). … This issue appears to be most prevalent in large frame industrial gas turbines.” This issue can be related to the fluid's water level now not being properly represented in the test as it is in operation. The trend is to study testing in the absence of water. For example, the turbine oil oxidation stability test (TOST; ASTM D943) now has a dry TOST (ASTM D7873). Differences between the oxidation of lubricants with and without water have been reported. Thus, there is a need for a performance test that resembles current operation conditions and serves condition monitoring purposes. This paper discusses the application of a dry RPVOT and how it compares to the standard version. New and in-service fluids are compared using both the dry and wet version of this oxidation performance test—along with intermediate chamber extraction samples having supported chemical testing.

1.
Wooton
D.
, “
Oxidation—The Lubricant's Nemesis
,”
Practicing Oil Analysis
9
(
2007
): 5–6.
2.
Lantos
A.
,
Bodner
A.
,
Lucchiari
G.
,
Lantos
E.
, and
Wooton
D.
, “
Integrating MPC, RULER and RPVOT to Assess Oxidation Condition and to Estimate Lubricant Refreshment for Lean Operation
” (paper presentation, Noria's Reliable Plant Conference and Exhibition,
Indianapolis
, April 17–19,
2018
).
3.
Yano
A.
,
Watanabe
S.
,
Miyazaki
Y.
, and
Yamamoto
Y.
, “
Study on Sludge Formation during the Oxidation Process of Turbine Oils
,”
Tribology Transactions
47
, no.
1
(
2004
): 111–122.
4.
Swift
S. T.
,
Butler
K. D.
, and
Dewald
W.
, “
Turbine Oil Quality and Field Application Requirements
,” in
Turbine Lubrication in the 21st Century
, ed.
Herguth
W. R.
and
Warne
T. M.
(
West Conshohocken, PA
:
ASTM International
,
2001
), 39–52.
5.
von Fuchs
G. H.
, “
Rotary Bomb Oxidation Test
,”
Lubrication Engineering
16
, no.
1
(
1960
): 22–31.
6.
von Fuchs
G. H.
,
Claridge
E. L.
, and
Zuidema
H. H.
, “
The Rotary Bomb Oxidation Test for Inhibited Turbine Oils
,”
Materials. Research and Standards
186
(
1952
): 43–46.
7.
Selby
T. W.
,
Froelicher
S. W.
, and
James
S.
, “
Studies of the Oxidation Dynamics of Turbine Oils—Initial Data from a New Form of the Rotating Pressure Vessel Oxidation Test
,”
Journal of ASTM International
4
, no.
9
(
2007
):
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal