Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
ASTM Selected Technical Papers
Structural Integrity of Additive Manufactured Materials and Parts
By
Nima Shamsaei
Nima Shamsaei
Symposium Chair and STP Editor
1
Auburn University
,
Auburn, AL,
US
Search for other works by this author on:
Mohsen Seifi
Mohsen Seifi
Symposium Chair and STP Editor
2
ASTM International
,
Washington, DC,
US
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN:
978-0-8031-7708-6
No. of Pages:
378
Publisher:
ASTM International
Publication date:
2020

When considering orthopedic implants for bone growth, several factors such as porosity, pore size, stiffness, friction, and strength can affect bone growth and contribute to the long-term success of the implant. Additive manufacturing is one tool to help achieve the ideal factors for implant structures and materials. Smith+Nephew has developed an additive manufactured (AM), Ti-6Al-4V advanced porous structure designed to be similar to cancellous bone with up to 80% porosity. This structure is currently used as part of both acetabular shells and augments. This paper describes the preclinical testing of this advanced porous structure that comprised coupon-level and device-level testing. The critical parameters that can influence bone ingrowth, such as pore size (mean void intercept length, or MVIL) and porosity, were measured. The ability of the three-dimensional porous structure to withstand compressive, tensile, and shear forces was evaluated in static (monotonic) testing. Finally, bone ingrowth was assessed in a load-bearing ovine model. Clinically relevant device-level fatigue testing was conducted in foam blocks with a cavity and adjacent rim defect to simulate the acetabulum. The strength of the locking screw hole features was assessed using static and fatigue cantilever bending and pull-through strength. Acetabular constructs were also fatigue tested in an unsupported model with an adjacent augment and corresponding defect. Constructs completed all clinically relevant fatigue testing with no fractures.

1.
Jasty
M.
,
Bragdon
C.
,
Burke
D.
,
O'Connor
D.
,
Lowenstein
J.
, and
Harris
W. H.
, “
In Vivo Skeletal Responses to Porous-Surfaced Implants Subjected to Small Induced Motions
,”
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
79
, no.
5
(
1997
): 707–714.
2.
Bobyn
J. D.
,
Pilliar
R. M.
,
Cameron
H. U.
, and
Weatherly
G. C.
, “
The Optimum Pore Size for the Fixation of Porous-Surfaced Metal Implants by the Ingrowth of Bone
,”
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
150
(
1980
): 263–270.
3.
Karageorgiou
V.
and
Kaplan
D.
, “
Porosity of 3D Biomaterial Scaffolds and Osteogenesis
,”
Biomaterials
26
, no.
27
(
2005
): 5474–5491.
4.
Frost
H. M.
, “
Wolff's Law and Bone's Structural Adaptations to Mechanical Usage: An Overview for Clinicians
,”
The Angle Orthodontist
64
, no.
3
(
1994
): 175–188.
5.
Wright
J. M.
,
Pellicci
P. M.
,
Salvati
E. A.
,
Ghelman
B.
,
Roberts
M. M.
, and
Koh
J. L.
, “
Bone Density Adjacent to Press-Fit Acetabular Components: A Prospective Analysis with Quantitative Computed Tomography
,”
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
83
, no.
4
(
2001
): 529–536.
6.
Standard Test Method for Stereological Evaluation of Porous Coatings on Medical Implants
, ASTM F1854-15 (
West Conshohocken, PA
:
ASTM International
, approved March 15,
2015
),
7.
Gibson
L. J.
and
Ashby
M. F.
,
Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties
(
Cambridge, MA
:
Cambridge University Press
,
1997
).
8.
Fenwick
S.
,
Wilson
D.
,
Williams
M.
,
Penmetsa
J.
,
Ellis
K.
,
Smith
M.
,
Dodd
J.
,
Pitcher
J.
, and
Scott
M.
,
“A Load Bearing Model to Assess Osseointegration of Novel Surfaces—A Pilot Study
,” in
Proceedings of the Eighth World Biomaterials Congress
(
Red Hook, NY
:
Curran Associates
,
2008
), 1240.
9.
Wirtz
D. C.
,
Schiffers
N.
,
Pandorf
T.
,
Radermacher
K.
,
Weichert
D.
, and
Forst
R.
, “
Critical Evaluation of Known Bone Material Properties to Realize Anisotropic FE-Simulation of the Proximal Femur
,”
Journal of Biomechanics
33
, no.
10
(
2000
): 1325–1330.
10.
Adler
E.
,
Stuchin
S. A.
, and
Kummer
F. J.
, “
Stability of Press-Fit Acetabular Cups
,”
The Journal of Arthroplasty
7
, no.
3
(
1992
): 295–301.
11.
Brandl
E.
,
Leyens
C.
, and
Palm
F.
, “
Mechanical Properties of Additive Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V Using Wire and Powder Based Processes
,”
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
26
, no.
1
(
2011
),
12.
Paprosky
W. G.
,
Perona
P. G.
, and
Lawrence
J. M.
, “
Acetabular Defect Classification and Surgical Reconstruction in Revision Arthroplasty: A 6-Year Follow-Up Evaluation
,”
The Journal of Arthroplasty
9
, no.
1
(
1994
): 33–44.
13.
Hayes
W. C.
and
Bouxsein
M. L.
, “
Biomechanics of Cortical and Trabecular Bone: Implications for Assessment of Fracture Risk
,” in
Basic Orthopaedic Biomechanics
, ed.
Mow
V. C.
and
Hayes
W. C.
(
Philadelphia, PA
:
Lippincott-Raven Publishers
,
1997
), 69–112.
14.
Bobyn
J. D.
,
Pilliar
R. M.
,
Cameron
H. U.
and
Weatherly
G. C.
, “
The Optimum Pore Size for the Fixation of Porous-Surfaced Metal Implants by the Ingrowth of Bone
,”
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
150
(
1980
):263–270.
15.
Morgan
E. F.
and
Keaveny
T. M.
, “
Dependence of Yield Strain of Human Trabecular Bone on Anatomic Site
,”
Journal of Biomechanics
34
, no.
5
(
2001
): 569–577.
16.
Røhl
L.
,
Larsen
E.
,
Linde
F.
,
Odgaard
A.
, and
Jørgensen
J.
, “
Tensile and Compressive Properties of Cancellous Bone
,”
Journal of Biomechanics
24
, no.
12
(
1991
): 1143–1149.
17.
Keaveny
T. M.
,
Wachtel
E. F.
,
Ford
C. M.
, and
Hayes
W. C.
, “
Differences between the Tensile and Compressive Strengths of Bovine Tibial Trabecular Bone Depend on Modulus
,”
Journal of Biomechanics
27
, no.
9
(
1994
): 1137–1146.
18.
Standard Specification for Femoral Prostheses—Metallic Implants
, ASTM F2068-15 (
West Conshohocken, PA
:
ASTM International
, approved March 15,
2015
),
19.
Zargarian
A.
,
Esfahanian
M.
,
Kadkhodapour
J.
, and
Ziaei-Rad
S.
, “
Numerical Simulation of the Fatigue Behavior of Additive Manufactured Titanium Porous Lattice Structures
,”
Materials Science and Engineering: C
60
(
2016
): 339–347.
20.
Hedayati
R.
,
Hosseini-Toudeshky
H.
,
Sadighi
M.
,
Mohammadi-Aghdam
M.
, and
Zadpoor
A. A.
, “
Computational Prediction of the Fatigue Behavior of Additively Manufactured Porous Metallic Biomaterials
,”
International Journal of Fatigue
84
(
2016
): 67–79.
21.
Standard Test Method for Shear Testing of Calcium Phosphate Coatings and Metallic Coatings
, ASTM F1044-05(2017)e1 (
West Conshohocken, PA
:
ASTM International
, approved December 1,
2017
),
22.
Standard Test Method for Shear and Bending Fatigue Testing of Calcium Phosphate and Metallic Medical and Composite Calcium Phosphate/Metallic Coatings
, ASTM F1160-14(2017)e1 (
West Conshohocken, PA
:
ASTM International
, approved December 1,
2017
),
23.
Standard Test Method for Tension Testing of Calcium Phosphate and Metallic Coatings
, ASTM F1147-05(2017)e1 (
West Conshohocken, PA
:
ASTM International
, approved May 1,
2017
),
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal