Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
ASTM Selected Technical Papers
Reactor Dosimetry: 16th International Symposium
By
Mary Helen Sparks
Mary Helen Sparks
Symposium Chairperson and STP Editor
1
White Sands Missile Range
,
White Sands, NM,
US
Search for other works by this author on:
K. Russell DePriest
K. Russell DePriest
Symposium Chairperson and STP Editor
2
Sandia National Laboratories
,
Albuquerque, NM,
US
Search for other works by this author on:
David W. Vehar
David W. Vehar
Symposium Chairperson and STP Editor
3
Sandia National Laboratories
,
Albuquerque, NM,
US
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN:
978-0-8031-7661-4
No. of Pages:
654
Publisher:
ASTM International
Publication date:
2018

The Oak Ridge National Laboratory pool critical assembly pressure vessel wall benchmark facility is a standard benchmark for qualifying light water reactor radiation transport methods and data. As such, it is familiar to the reactor dosimetry community and provides a convenient vehicle to introduce that community to the Monte Carlo N-Particle® code system's unstructured mesh geometry capability. An approach to model the pool critical assembly geometry using unstructured mesh and an accompanying analysis workflow that makes use of eigenvalue calculations to generate a fixed, distributed, source for the final dosimetry analysis is given. In the final analysis, the International Reactor Dosimetry and Fusion File v1.05 library is used to calculate unadjusted reaction rates. Individual foil calculation-to-experiment comparisons are usually within 10 % but are typically greater than unity, leading to an overall average calculation-to-experiment ratio of 1.10. The paper concludes with suggestions for short- and long-term future refinements that are expected to improve the agreement between calculations and experimental values.

1.
Remec
,
I.
and
Kam
,
F. B. K.
, “
Pool Critical Assembly Pressure Vessel Facility Benchmark
,” Tech. Rep. NUREG/CR-6454,
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
, Oak Ridge, TN,
1997
.
2.
Kulesza
,
J. A.
and
Martz
,
R. L.
, “
Evaluation of the Pool Critical Assembly Benchmark with Explicitly Modeled Geometry Using MCNP6
,”
Nucl. Technol.
, Vol.
197
, No.
3
,
2017
, pp. 284–295,
3.
Martz
,
R. L.
, “
The MCNP6 Book on Unstructured Mesh Geometry: User’s Guide for MCNP 6.2
,” Tech. Rep. LA–UR-17-22442,
Los Alamos National Laboratory
, Los Alamos, NM,
2017
.
4.
SpaceClaim Corporation
, “
SpaceClaim Engineer 2014
,”
2014
, http://web.archive.org/web/20180827192809/http://www.spaceclaim.com/en/default.aspx (accessed August 27, 2018).
5.
ISO 10303-21,
Industrial Automation Systems and Integration—Product Data Representation and Exchange—Part 21: Implementation Methods: Clear Text Encoding of the Exchange Structure
,
International Organization for Standardization
,
Geneva, Switzerland
,
2016
.
6.
Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp.
, “
Abaqus/CAE 6.12 Online Documentation
,”
Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp.
,
Forest Hill, MD
,
2012
.
7.
Kulesza
,
J. A.
and
Martz
,
R. L.
, “
MCNP6 Unstructured Mesh Tutorial Using Abaqus/CAE 6.12-1
,” Tech. Rep. LA–UR-15-25143,
Los Alamos National Laboratory
, Los Alamos, NM,
2015
.
8.
Capote
,
R.
,
Zolotarev
,
K. I.
,
Pronyaev
,
V. G.
, and
Trkov
,
A.
, “
Updating and Extending the IRDF-2002 Dosimetry Library
,”
J. ASTM Int.
, Vol.
9
, No.
4
, pp. 1–9,
2012
,
9.
Mosher
,
S. W.
,
Johnson
,
S. R.
,
Bevill
,
A. M.
,
Ibrahim
,
A. M.
,
Daily
,
C. R.
,
Evans
,
T. M.
,
Wagner
,
J. C.
,
Johnson
,
J. O.
, and
Grove
,
R. E.
, “
ADVANTG—An Automated Variance Reduction Parameter Generator
,” Tech. Rep. ORNL/TM-2013/416, Rev. 1,
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
, Oak Ridge, TN,
2015
.
10.
Fero
,
A. H.
,
Anderson
,
S. L.
, and
Roberts
,
G. K.
, “
Analysis of the ORNL PCA Benchmark Using TORT and BUGLE-96
,”
Reactor Dosimetry: Radiation Metrology and Assessment, ASTM STP 1398
,
Williams
J. G.
,
Vehar
D. W.
,
Ruddy
F. H.
, and
Gilliam
D. M.
, Eds.,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
,
2001
, pp. 360–366,
11.
McElroy
,
W. N.
, “
LWR Pressure Vessel Surveillance Dosimetry Improvement Program: PCA Experiments and Blind Test
,” Tech. Rep. NUREG/CR-1861 (HEDL-TME 80-87),
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
, Rockville, MD,
1981
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal