Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
ASTM Selected Technical Papers
Graphite Testing for Nuclear Applications: The Significance of Test Specimen Volume and Geometry and the Statistical Significance of Test Specimen Population
By
Nassia Tzelepi
Nassia Tzelepi
Editor
Search for other works by this author on:
Mark Carroll
Mark Carroll
Editor
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN:
978-0-8031-7601-0
No. of Pages:
228
Publisher:
ASTM International
Publication date:
2014

Understanding the effects of radiation on nuclear grade graphite requires complex experiment design with specific specimen geometries. These geometries are not always optimal for the various testing and measurement standards used to characterize the graphite before and after irradiation. In this work, geometry constraints of specimens for laser flash determination of thermal diffusivity are investigated. The laser flash technique depends on the assumption of one dimensional adiabatic heat conduction between two of the specimen surfaces. As test temperatures rise above 400°C, radiation heat loss from all surfaces becomes significant and must be accounted for through modeling. Experiments were performed using industrial grade AXF-5Q graphite and nuclear grade graphite, PCEA, NBG-18, and Gilso, to understand the limits of the common radiation heat loss correction models used for laser flash diffusivity testing. From this data, a maximum specimen diameter to thickness ratio is presented. This testing limitation, along with the limited volume available in irradiation experiments, drives the specimen diameter and thickness to be minimized. As the specimen thickness is reduced, the significance of the graphite inhomogeneity and high thermal conductance influence on measurement uncertainty must be considered. Due to the relatively high thermal conductivity of graphite, thin specimens can result in low thermal transit times. Furthermore, as the thickness of the sample approaches two or three times the size of filler grain material used in the graphite, the thin specimen may not represent the homogeneous bulk material. This effect as well as ambiguity in the exact arrival time of the laser energy due to finite laser pulse widths is investigated for a lower limit on specimen thickness.

1.
Parker
,
W. J.
,
Jenkins
,
R. J.
,
Butler
,
C. P.
, and
Abbott
,
G. L.
, “
Flash Method of Determining Thermal Diffusivity, Heat Capacity, and Thermal Conductivity
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
, Vol.
32
, No.
9
,
1961
, pp. 1679–1684.
2.
Akoshima
,
M.
and
Baba
,
T.
, “
Study on a Thermal-Diffusivity Standard for Laser Flash Method Measurements
,”
Int. J. Thermophys.
, Vol.
27
, No.
4
,
2006
, pp. 1189–1203.
3.
Cowan
,
R. D.
, “
Pulse Method of Measuring Thermal Diffusivity at High Temperatures
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
, Vol.
34
, No.
4
,
1963
, pp. 926–927.
4.
Cape
,
J. A.
and
Lehman
,
G. W.
, “
Temperature and Finite Pulse-Time Effects in the Flash Method for Measuring Thermal Diffusivity
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
, Vol.
34
, No.
7
,
1963
, pp. 1909–1913.
5.
Josell
,
D.
,
Warren
,
J.
, and
Cezairliyan
,
A.
, “
Comment On: Analysis for Determining Thermal Diffusivity From Thermal Pulse Experiments
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
, Vol.
78
, No.
11
,
1995
, pp. 6867–6869.
6.
Clark
,
L. M.
, III
and
Taylor
,
R. E.
, “
Radiation Loss in the Flash Method for Thermal Diffusivity
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
, Vol.
46
, No.
2
,
1975
, pp. 714–719.
7.
Azumi
,
T.
and
Takahashi
,
Y.
, “
Novel Finite Pulse-Width Correction in Flash Thermal Diffusivity Measurement
,”
Rev. Sci. Instrum.
, Vol.
52
, No.
9
,
1981
, p. 1411.
8.
Kline
,
S. J.
and
McClintock
,
F. A.
, “
Describing Uncertainties in Single-Sample Experiments
,”
Mech. Eng.
, Vol.
75
, No.
1
,
1953
, pp. 3–8.
9.
Windes
,
W.
,
Swank
,
W. D.
,
Rohrbaugh
,
D.
, and
Lord
,
J.
, “
AGC-2 Preirradiation Data Analysis Report
,” ID National Laboratory INL-EXT-13-28612,
ID National Laboratory
, Idaho Fall, ID,
2013
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal