Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
ASTM Selected Technical Papers
Pesticide Formulation and Delivery Systems: 33rd Volume, “Sustainability: Contributions from Formulation Technology”
By
Carmine Sesa
Carmine Sesa
Editor
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN:
978-0-8031-7578-5
No. of Pages:
196
Publisher:
ASTM International
Publication date:
2014

Analysis of droplet size data using laser diffraction allows for quick and easy assessment of droplet size for agricultural spray nozzles and pesticides; however, operation and setup of the instrument and test system can potentially influence the accuracy of the data. One of the factors is the orientation of the spray plume relative to the laser beam. The common practice is to orientate the nozzle such that the nozzle orifice's long axis is 90 degrees from the laser beam. Some wind tunnels are designed in a manner such that the spray plume impinges with the walls or the design of the nozzle may necessitate a deviation from this standard practice to obtain a measurement in some situations. The objective of this research was to determine the influence spray plume orientation had on measured droplet size spectra in a low-speed wind tunnel. The orientation of the nozzle tested was 45, 60, 75, and 90 degrees in rotation relative to the laser beam. Four nozzles (AIXR11005, AI11005, TT11005, and XR11005) were evaluated using three different spray solutions. Treatments were evaluated using a laser diffraction system. The results indicate that spray plume orientation does not have an effect on droplet size data for these nozzles, regardless of spray solution. The data from these tests will aid in the standardization of laser diffraction use in low-speed wind tunnels and increase the repeatability of measurements between different spray testing laboratories.

1.
Maybank
,
J.
,
Yoshida
,
K.
, and
Grover
,
R.
, “
Spray Drift from Agricultural Pesticide Applications
,”
J. Pollut. Control Assoc.
, Vol.
28
, No.
10
,
1978
, pp. 1009–1014.
2.
Hewitt
,
A. J.
,
2000
, “
Spray Drift: Impact of Requirements to Protect the Environment
,”
Crop Prot.
, Vol.
19
, No.
8–10
, pp. 623–627.
3.
Knoche
,
M.
, “
Effect of Droplet Size and Carrier Volume on Performance of Foliage-Applied Herbicides
,”
Crop Prot.
, Vol.
13
, No.
3
,
1994
, pp. 163–178.
4.
Miller
,
P. C. H.
and
Butler Ellis
,
M. C.
, “
Effects of Formulation on Spray Nozzle Performance for Applications from Ground-Based Boom Sprayers
,”
Crop Prot.
, Vol.
19
, No.
8–10
,
2000
, pp. 609–615.
5.
Nuyttens
,
D.
,
Baetens
,
K.
,
De Schampheleire
,
M.
, and
Sonck
,
B.
, “
Effect of Nozzle Type, Size and Pressure on Spray Droplet Characteristics
,”
Biosyst. Eng.
, Vol.
97
, No.
3
,
2007
, pp. 333–345.
6.
Omar
,
D.
,
Matthews
,
G. A.
,
Ford
,
M. G.
, and
Salt
,
D. W.
, “
The Influence of Spray Droplet Characteristics on the Efficacy of Permethrin Against the Diamondback Moth Plutella Xylostella: The Effect of Drop Size and Concentration on the Potency of ULV- and EC-Based Residual Deposits
,”
Pestic. Sci.
, Vol.
32
, No.
4
,
1991
, pp. 439–450.
7.
Reed
,
J. T.
and
Smith
,
D. B.
, “
Droplet Size and Spray Volume Effects on Insecticide Deposit and Mortality of Heliothine (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Larvae in Cotton
,”
J. Econ. Entomol.
, Vol.
94
, No.
3
,
2001
, pp. 640–647.
8.
Dodge
,
L. G.
,
Rhodes
,
D. J.
, and
Reitz
,
R. D.
, “
Drop-Size Measurement Techniques for Sprays: Comparison of Malvern Laser-Diffraction and Aerometrics Phase/Doppler
,”
Appl. Opt.
, Vol.
26
, No.
11
,
1987
, pp. 2144–2154.
9.
Hewitt
,
A. J.
, “
Measurement Techniques for Atomization Droplet Size Spectra in Wind Tunnels
,”
Spray Drift Task Force Report T94-001
,
EPA
,
Washington, DC
,
2008
.
10.
Dodge
,
L. G.
, “
Comparison of Performance of Drop-Sizing Instruments
,”
Appl. Opt.
, Vol.
26
, No.
7
,
1987
, pp. 1328–1341.
11.
Arnold
,
A. C.
, “
A Comparative Study of Drop Sizing Equipment for Agricultural Fan-Spray Atomizers
,”
Aerosol Sci. Technol.
, Vol.
12
, No.
2
,
1990
, pp. 431–445.
12.
Chapple
,
A. C.
,
Taylor
,
R. A. J.
, and
Hall
,
F. R.
, “
The Transformation of Spatially Determined Drop Sizes to their Temporal Equivalents for Agricultural Sprays
,”
J. Agric. Eng. Res.
, Vol.
60
, No.
1
,
1995
, pp. 49–56.
13.
Tuck
,
C. R.
,
Ellis
,
M. C. B.
, and
Miller
,
P. C. H.
, “
Techniques for Measurement of Droplet Size and Velocity Distributions in Agricultural Sprays
,”
Crop Prot.
, Vol.
16
, No.
7
,
1997
, pp. 619–628.
14.
Hewitt
,
A. J.
and
Valcore
,
D. L.
, “
Measurement Techniques for Simulated Agricultural Sprays Produced by Ground Sprayers using Number Density Weighted Sampling Techniques
,”
Proceedings of the ILASS-95
, Detroit, MI, May 21–24,
1995
.
15.
Butler Ellis
,
M. C.
,
Tuck
,
C. R.
, and
Miller
,
P. C. H.
, “
The Effect of Some Adjuvants on Sprays Produced by Agricultural Flat Fan Nozzles
,”
Crop Prot.
, Vol.
16
, No.
1
,
1997
, pp. 41–50.
16.
Stainier
,
C.
,
Destain
,
M.-F.
,
Schiffers
,
B.
, and
Lebeau
,
F.
, “
Droplet Size Spectra and Drift Effect of Two Phenmedipham Formulations and Four Adjuvants Mixtures
,”
Crop Prot.
, Vol.
25
, No.
12
,
2006
, pp. 1238–1243.
17.
Holloway
,
P. J.
,
Butler Ellis
,
M. C.
,
Webb
,
D. A.
,
Western
,
N. M.
,
Tuck
,
C. R.
,
Hayes
,
A. L.
, and
Miller
,
P. C. H.
, “
Effects of Some Agricultural Tank-Mix Adjuvants on the Deposition Efficiency of Aqueous Sprays on Foliage
,”
Crop Prot.
, Vol.
19
, No.
1
,
2000
, pp. 27–37.
18.
Hoffmann
,
W. C.
,
Hewitt
,
A. J.
,
Ross
,
J. B.
,
Bagley
,
W. E.
,
Martin
,
D. E.
, and
Fritz
,
B. K.
, “
Spray Adjuvant Effects on Droplet Size Spectra Measured by Three Laser-Based Systems in a High-Speed Wind Tunnel
,”
J. ASTM Int.
, Vol.
5
, No.
6
,
2008
, pp. 12.
19.
Hewitt
,
A. J.
,
Zany
,
W.
,
Dorr
,
G. J.
, and
Woods
,
N.
, “
Comparison of the Droplet Size Spectra Produced by Rotary Atomizers and Hydraulic Nozzles Under Simulated Aerial Application Conditions
,”
J. Environ. Sci. Health B
, Vol.
29
, No.
4
,
1994
, pp. 647–660.
20.
Giles
,
D. K.
,
Young
,
B. W.
,
Alexander
,
P. R.
, and
French
,
H. M.
, “
Intermittent Control of Liquid Flow from Fan Nozzles in Concurrent Air Streams: Wind Tunnel Studies of Droplet Size Effects
,”
J. Agric. Eng. Res.
, Vol.
62
, No.
2
,
1995
, pp. 77–84.
21.
Wild
,
P. N.
and
Swithenbank
,
J.
, “
Beam Stop and Vignetting Effects in Particle Size Measurements by Laser Diffraction
,”
Appl. Opt.
, Vol.
25
, No.
19
,
1986
, pp. 3520–3526.
22.
Triballier
,
K.
,
Dumouchel
,
C.
, and
Cousin
,
J.
, “
A Technical Study on the Spraytec Performances: Influence of Multiple Light Scattering and Multi-Modal Drop-Size Distribution Measurements
,”
Exp. Fluids
, Vol.
35
, No.
4
,
2003
, pp. 347–356.
23.
Gülder
,
Ö. L.
, “
Multiple Scattering Effects in Dense Spray Sizing by Laser Diffraction
,”
Aerosol Sci. Technol.
, Vol.
12
, No.
3
,
1990
, pp. 570–577.
24.
Agrawal
,
Y. C.
,
Whitmire
,
A.
,
Mikkelsen
,
O. A.
, and
Pottsmith
,
H. C.
, “
Light Scattering by Random Shaped Particles and Consequences on Measuring Suspended Sediments by Laser Diffraction
,”
J. Geophys. Res.
, Vol.
113
, No.
C4
,
2008
, C04023.
25.
Sympatec
,
HELOS-R (E) User Manual
,
Sympatec
,
Clausthal-Zellerfeld, Germany
,
2009
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal