Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
ASTM Selected Technical Papers
Pesticide Formulation and Delivery Systems: 33rd Volume, “Sustainability: Contributions from Formulation Technology”
By
Carmine Sesa
Carmine Sesa
Editor
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN:
978-0-8031-7578-5
No. of Pages:
196
Publisher:
ASTM International
Publication date:
2014

Drifting of fine droplets during the application of pesticides is an issue of increasing commercial and regulatory importance. Spray drift damages susceptible crops, wastes resources, and results in inconsistent weed control. Several strategies are currently used to mitigate this problem. These include enhanced nozzle technology, improved application techniques, and inclusion of drift control additives in the final tank mix. Elimination of small diameter droplets (“driftable fines”) is a key goal. Measurements were made of droplet size distributions of sprayed pesticide formulations containing commercial products representative of the leading drift control technologies, including guar, polyacrylamides, lecithin, and oil/surfactant mixtures. Effects of spray nozzle and pressure were also evaluated. Nozzle technology plays a large role in determining the spray droplet size spectrum. However, there is a strong interplay between nozzle design and formulation variables. We found that drift control agents have greater impact on spray from flat fan nozzles. Also, the ranking of adjuvants depends on the nozzle technology in use: for glyphosate/ammonium sulfate solutions, polymers were more effective in reducing fines from a flat fan nozzle, while surfactant-based products were marginally superior when an air induction nozzle was used. The regulatory community is currently focused on mitigating the generation of small droplets. However, the generation of oversized droplets also effects spray efficacy. The impact of drift control agents on the breadth of the droplet size spectrum is an aspect of drift control which is often overlooked. We found that emulsion-based products tighten the droplet size distribution, while the polymer-based products shift the mean droplet diameter up, broadening the distribution in the process: while the latter effect may earn better ratings from regulatory agencies concerned exclusively with spray drift mitigation, it may be less helpful in enhancing application efficacy.

1.
EPA/OPP
,
Spray Drift and Drift Reduction Technology
, PPDC Meeting, May 3,
2012
, Session VII, Updates, Arlington, VA.
2.
Londo
,
J. P.
,
Bautista
,
N. S.
,
Sagers
,
C. L.
,
Lee
,
E. H.
and
Watrud
,
L. S.
, “
Glyphosate Drift Promotes Changes in Fitness and Transgene Flow in Canola (Brassica Napus) and Hybrids
,”
Ann. Bot.
, Vol.
106
, No.
6
,
2010
, pp. 957–965.
3.
Boerboom
,
C.
and
Owen
,
M.
,
2006
, “
Facts About Glyphosate-Resistant Weeds
,”
The Glyphosate, Weeds, and Crop Series
,
GWC1
,
Purdue Extension
.
4.
Hartzler
,
R.
,
2008
, “
Managing the Risk of Glyphosate Resistant Weeds
,” Iowa State University Weed Science, www.weeds.iastate.edu/mgmt/2008/GRmodel.pdf (Last accessed 16 Oct
2012
).
5.
Hartzler
,
R.
,
2011
, “
Spread of Glyphosate Resistant Weeds
,” AGProfessional, http://www.agprofessional.com/resource-centers/soybean/news/spread_of_glyphosate-resistant_weeds_120016569.html# (Last accessed 16 Oct
2012
).
6.
Miller
,
P. C. H.
and
Butler Ellis
,
M. C.
, “
Effects of Formulation on Spray Nozzle Performances for Applications from Ground-Based Sprayers
,”
Crop. Prot.
, Vol.
19
, No.
8
,
2000
, pp. 609–615.
7.
Fietsam
,
J. F. W.
,
Young
,
B. G.
and
Steffen
,
R. W.
, “
Differential Response of Herbicide Drift Reduction Nozzles to Drift Control agents with Glyphosate
,”
Trans. ASAE
, Vol.
47
, No.
5
,
2004
, pp. 1405–1411.
8.
Stanier
,
C.
,
Destain
,
M.-F.
,
Schiffers
,
B.
and
Lebeau
,
F.
, “
Droplet Size Spectra and Drift Effect of Two Phenmedipham Formulations and Four Adjuvants Mixtures
,”
Crop. Prot.
, Vol.
25
,
2006
, pp. 1238–1243.
9.
Klein
,
R. N.
,
Golus
,
J. A.
and
Nelms
,
K. L.
, “
The Effect of Adjuvants, Pesticide Formulation, and Spray Nozzle Tips on Spray Droplet Size
,”
J. ASTM Int.
, Vol.
6
, No.
6
,
2009
, JAI102156.
10.
ASTM E2798
:
Standard Test Method for Characterization of Performance of Pesticide Spray Drift Reduction Adjuvants for Ground Application
,
Annual Book of ASTM Standards
,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
,
2011
.
11.
Elsik
,
C. M.
, “
Round-Robin Evaluation of ASTM Standard Test Method E2798 for Spray Drift Reduction Adjuvants
,”
J. ASTM Int.
, Vol.
8
, No.
8
,
2011
, JAI103719.
12.
Elsik
,
C. M.
,
Stridde
,
H. M.
and
Schweiner
,
T. M.
, “
Spray Drift Reduction Technology Adjuvant Evaluation
,”
J. ASTM Int.
, Vol.
7
, No.
7
,
2010
, JAI102902.
13.
Dombrowski
,
N.
and
Fraser
, “
A Photographic Investigation into the Disintegration of Liquid Sheets
,”
R. P., Philos. Trans. A
, Vol.
247
,
1954
, pp. 101–130.
14.
Dombrowski
,
N.
and
Johns
,
W. R.
, “
The Aerodynamic Instability and Disintegration of Viscous Liquid Sheets
,”
Chem. Eng. Sci.
, Vol.
18
,
1963
, pp. 203–214.
15.
Romagnola
,
V.
,
2001
, “
Control of Spray Droplet Size by Rheology
,” Ph.D. thesis,
Princeton University
, Princeton, NJ.
16.
Ford
,
R. E.
and
Furmidge
,
C. G. L.
, “
The Formation of Drops from Viscous Newtonian Liquids Sprayed Through Fan-Jet Nozzles
,”
Br. J. Appl. Phys.
, Vol.
18
,
1967
, pp. 335–349.
17.
Eggers
,
J.
, “
Theory of Drop Formations
,”
Phys. Fluids
, Vol.
7
, No.
5
,
1995
, pp. 941–953.
18.
Bergeron
,
V.
, “
Designing Intelligent Fluids for Controlling Spray Applications
,”
C. R. Phys.
, Vol.
4
,
2003
, pp. 211–219.
19.
Dexter
,
R. W.
, “
The Effect of Fluid Properties on the Spray Quality from a Flat Fan Nozzle
,”
Pesticide Formulation and Applications System: 20th Volume, ASTM STP 1400
,
Viets
A. K.
,
Tann
R. S.
, and
Mueninghoff
J. C.
, Eds.,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
,
2001
, pp. 27–43.
20.
Butler Ellis
,
M. C.
,
Tuck
,
C. R.
and
Miller
,
P. C. H.
, “
Dilute Emulsions and Their Effect on the Breakup of the Liquid Sheet Producted by Flat-Fan Spray Nozzles
,”
Atom. Sprays
, Vol.
9
,
1999
, pp. 385–397.
21.
Qin
,
K.
,
Cloeter
,
M.
,
Tank
,
H.
,
Liu
,
L.
,
Wilson
,
S.
and
Yin
,
D.-W.
, “
Modeling the Spray Atomization of Emulsion Embedded Agricultural Solutions
,”
J. ASTM Int.
, Vol.
7
, No.
10
,
2010
, JAI103040.
22.
Mun
,
R. P.
,
Byars
,
J.
and
Boger
,
D. V.
, “
The Effects of Polymer Concentration and Molecular Weight on the Breakup of Laminar Capillary Jets
,”
J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech.
, Vol.
74
,
1998
, pp. 285–297.
23.
Mun
,
R. P.
,
Young
,
B. W.
and
Boger
,
D. V.
, “
Atomisation of Dilute Polymer Solutions in Agricultural Spray Nozzles
,”
J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech.
, Vol.
83
,
1999
, pp. 163–178.
24.
Gilbert
,
A. J.
, “
Local Environmental Risk Assessment for Pesticides (LERAP) in the UK
,”
Aspect. Appl. Biol.
, Vol.
57
,
2000
, pp. 83–90.
25.
ISO 22369-1:2006(E)
:
Crop Protection Equipment—Drift Classification of Spraying Equipment—Part 1 Classes
,
International Organization for Standardization
,
Geneva, Switzerland
,
2006
.
26.
Miller
,
P. C. H.
and
Tuck
,
C. R.
, “
Factors Influencing the Performance of Spray Delivery Systems: A Review of Recent Developments
,”
J. ASTM Int.
, Vol.
2
, No.
6
,
2005
, JAI12900.
27.
Knocke
,
M.
, “
Effect of Droplet size and Carrier Volume on Performance of Foliage Applied Herbicides
,”
Crop Prot.
, Vol.
13
,
1994
, pp. 163–178.
28.
Feng
,
P. C. C.
,
Chiu
,
T.
,
Sammons
,
R. D.
and
Ryerse
,
J. S.
, “
Droplet Size Affects Glyphosate Retention, Absorption, and Translocation in Corn
,”
Weed Sci.
, Vol.
51
, No.
3
,
2003
, pp. 443–448.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal