Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
ASTM Selected Technical Papers
Pesticide Formulation and Delivery Systems: 32nd Volume, Innovating Legacy Products for New UsesAvailable to Purchase
By
Mark L. Bernards
Mark L. Bernards
Guest Editor and Symposium Chairman
1
Western Illinois University
,
Macomb, IL,
US
Search for other works by this author on:
Editor
Bala Devisetty
Bala Devisetty
Symposium Co-Chairman
2
Valent Biosciences Corporation
,
Long Grove, IL,
US
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN:
978-0-8031-7544-0
No. of Pages:
220
Publisher:
ASTM International
Publication date:
2013

Textiles treated with antimicrobial agents are emerging as new strategies to reduce acquisition of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). Essential to development/validation of these textiles are standard methods for the testing antimicrobial textile efficacy. Our laboratory has developed new testing methods, the fabric challenge assays, to recapitulate each transmission method and test the efficacy of antimicrobial textiles in a more “real world” simulation. 5 × 105 colony-forming units/ml (CFU/ml) MRSA suspensions were grown. 15 × 15 cm2 swatches of control, antimicrobial, hydrophobic barrier, and VTT003 fabric were inoculated with MRSA either by aerosol, splatter, or direct contact. Inoculated fabric was left at room temperature for 0, 30, or 60 min. Fabric was then transferred to buffer and shaken for 3 min at 400 rpm. A liquid suspension (0.1 ml) was then plated onto blood agar, grown overnight at 37°C, and colonies were counted. In the aerosol test, at 0 min, VTT003 significantly reduced MRSA by 78.52 ± 10.26 % compared to control fabric. At 30 min, antimicrobial reduced MRSA levels by 91.48 ± 8.52 %. In the splatter test, at 0 min, antimicrobial, hydrophobic barrier, and VTT003 fabrics reduced MRSA levels by 98.56 ± 1.44, 83.91 ± 13.16, and 100.00 ± 0.03 %, respectively. At 30 min, hydrophobic barrier and VTT003 reduced levels by 82.63 ± 17.37 and 100.00 ± 0.00 %, respectively. At 60 min, hydrophobic barrier and VTT003 abrogated MRSA levels. In the contact test, at 0 min, hydrophobic barrier and VTT003 reduced MRSA levels by 99.06 ± 0.94 and 97.08 ± 2.92 %, respectively. At 30 min, hydrophobic barrier and VTT003 reduced MRSA levels by 100.00 ± 0.03 and 19.38 ± 19.38 %, respectively. At 60 min, hydrophobic barrier and VTT003 abrogated MRSA levels. The fabric challenge assays are a novel method for evaluation of antimicrobial textile performance and should be considered in the development of standards and testing methods for all antimicrobial textiles intended for use in healthcare infection control strategies.

1.
Klevens
,
R. M.
,
Edwards
,
J. R.
,
Richards
,
C. L.
, Jr.
,
Horan
,
T. C.
,
Gaynes
,
R. P.
,
Pollock
,
D. A.
, and
Cardo
,
D. M.
, “
Estimating Health Care-Associated Infections and Deaths in U.S. Hospitals, 2002
,”
Public Health Rep.
, Vol.
122
, No.
2
,
2007
, pp. 160–166.
2.
Wong
,
D.
,
Nye
,
K.
, and
Hollis
,
P.
, “
Microbial Flora on Doctors’ White Coats
,”
Brit. Med. J.
, Vol.
303
, No.
6817
,
1991
, pp. 1602–1604.
3.
Wilson
,
J. A.
,
Loveday
,
H. P.
,
Hoffman
,
P. N.
, and
Pratt
,
R. J.
, “
Uniform: An Evidence Review of the Microbiological Significance of Uniforms and Uniform Policy in the Prevention and Control of Healthcare-Associated Infections. Report to the Department of Health (England)
,”
J. Hosp. Infect.
, Vol.
66
, No.
4
,
2007
, pp. 301–307.
4.
Perry
,
C.
,
Marshall
,
R.
, and
Jones
,
E.
, “
Bacterial Contamination of Uniforms
,”
J. Hosp. Infect.
, Vol.
48
, No.
3
,
2001
, pp. 238–241.
5.
Loh
,
W.
,
Ng
,
V.
, and
Holton
,
J.
, “
Bacterial Flora on the White Coats of Medical Students
.”
J. Hosp. Infect.
, Vol.
45
, No.
1
,
2000
, pp. 65–68.
6.
Babb
,
J. R.
,
Davies
,
J. G.
, and
Ayliffe
,
G. A. J.
, “
Contamination of Protective Clothing and Nurses’ Uniforms in an Isolation Ward
,”
J. Hosp. Infect.
, Vol.
4
, No.
2
,
1983
, pp. 149–157.
7.
Treakle
,
A. M.
,
Thom
,
K. A.
,
Furuno
,
J. P.
,
Strauss
,
S. M.
,
Harris
,
A. D.
, and
Perencevich
,
E. N.
, “
Bacterial Contamination of Health Care Workers’ White Coats
,”
Am. J. Infect. Control
, Vol.
37
, No.
2
,
2009
, pp. 101–105.
8.
Kniehl
,
E.
,
Becker
,
A.
, and
Forster
,
D. H.
, “
Bed, Bath and Beyond: Pitfalls in Prompt Eradication of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Carrier Status in Healthcare Workers
,”
J. Hosp. Infect.
, Vol.
59
, No.
3
,
2005
, pp. 180–187.
9.
Borkow
,
G.
and
Gabbay
,
J.
, “
Biocidal Textiles Can Help Fight Nosocomial Infections
,”
Med. Hypotheses
, Vol.
70
, No.
5
,
2008
, pp. 990–994.
10.
Hare
,
R.
and
Cooke
,
E. M.
, “
Self-Contamination of Patients With Staphylococcal Infections
,”
Brit. Med. J.
, Vol.
2
, No.
5248
,
1961
, pp. 333–336.
11.
Ohl
,
M.
,
Schweizer
,
M.
,
Graham
,
M.
,
Heilmann
,
K.
,
Boyken
,
L.
,
Perencevich
,
E.
, and
Diekema
,
D.
, “
Hospital Privacy Curtains are Frequently and Rapidly Contaminated With Potentially Pathogenic Bacteria
,”
Proceedings of the 51st Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
,
Chicago, IL
, Sept 17–20,
2011
.
12.
ASTM Standard E2149-01
,
“Standard Testing Method for Determining the Antimicrobial Activity of Immobilized Antimicrobial Agents Under Dynamic Conditions
,”
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
,
2009
.
13.
AATCC Standard AATCC100-2012
, “
Antimicrobial Finishes on Textile Materials: Assessment of
,”
AATCC
,
Research Triangle Park, NC
,
2012
.
14.
Testing Method 100-2004, Antimicrobial Finishes on Textile Materials: Assessment of
,”
Technical Manual
,
American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists (AATCC)
,
Research Triangle Park, NC
,
2005
, pp. 149–151.
15.
O’Hanlon
,
S. J.
and
Enright
,
M. C.
, “
A Novel Bactericidal Fabric Coating With Potent In Vitro Activity against Meticillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)
,”
Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents
, Vol.
33
, No.
5
,
2009
, pp. 427–431.
16.
Baxa
,
D.
,
Shetron-Rama
,
L.
,
Golembieski
,
M.
,
Golembieski
,
M.
,
Jain
,
S.
,
Gordon
,
M.
, and
Zervos
,
M.
, “
In Vitro Evaluation of a Novel Process for Reducing Bacterial Contamination of Environmental Surfaces
,”
Am. J. Infect. Control
, Vol.
39
, No.
6
,
2011
, pp. 483–487.
17.
Hastings
,
R.
,
Taylor
,
L.
, and
Phillips
,
P.
, “
RE: A Novel Bactericidal Fabric Coating With Potent In Vitro Activity against Meticillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)
,”
Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents
, Vol.
34
, No.
1
,
2009
, p. 99.
18.
Curtis
,
L. T.
, “
Prevention of Hospital-Acquired Infections: Review of Non-Pharmacological Interventions
,”
J. Hosp. Infect.
, Vol.
69
, No.
3
,
2008
, pp. 204–219.
19.
Siegel
,
J. D.
,
Rhinehart
,
E.
,
Jackson
,
M.
, and
Chiarello
,
L.
,
for the Health Care Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee
, “
2007 Guideline for Isolation Precautions: Preventing Transmission of Infectious Agents in Health Care Settings
,”
Am. J. Infect. Control
, Vol.
35
, No.
10 (Suppl, 2)
,
2007
, pp. 65–164.
20.
Kugel
,
A.
,
Stafslien
,
S.
, and
Chisholma
,
B. J.
, “
Antimicrobial Coatings Produced by “Tethering” Biocides to the Coating Matrix: A Comprehensive Review
,”
Prog. Org. Coat.
, Vol.
72
, No.
3
,
2011
, pp. 222–252.
21.
Maturin
,
L.
and
Peeler
,
J. T.
, “
Conventional Plate Count Method
,”
Bacteriological Analytical Manual
, 8th ed., Revision A,
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
,
College Park, MD
,
1998
, Chap. 3.
22.
Song
,
J.
,
Kong
,
H.
, and
Jang
,
J.
, “
Bacterial Adhesion Inhibition of the Quaternary Ammonium Functionalized Silica Nanoparticles
,”
Colloids Surfaces B: Biointerfaces
, Vol.
82
, No.
2
,
2011
, pp. 651–656.
23.
Bearman
,
G.
,
Rosato
,
A.
,
Elam
,
K.
,
Sanogo
,
K.
,
Stevens
,
M.
,
Sessler
,
C.
, and
Wenzel
,
R. P.
, “
A Cross-over Trial of Antimicrobial Scrubs to Reduce MRSA Burden on Healthcare Worker Apparel
,”
Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol.
, Vol.
33
, No.
3
,
2012
, pp. 268–275.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal