Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
ASTM Selected Technical Papers
Pesticide Formulation and Delivery Systems: 32nd Volume, Innovating Legacy Products for New Uses
By
Mark L. Bernards
Mark L. Bernards
Guest Editor and Symposium Chairman
1
Western Illinois University
,
Macomb, IL,
US
Search for other works by this author on:
Editor
Bala Devisetty
Bala Devisetty
Symposium Co-Chairman
2
Valent Biosciences Corporation
,
Long Grove, IL,
US
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN:
978-0-8031-7544-0
No. of Pages:
220
Publisher:
ASTM International
Publication date:
2013

There are several types of drift-reduction technology (DRT) adjuvants commercially available. Natural and synthetic water-soluble polymers function by increasing extensional or shear viscosity. These polymers do a very good job reducing fines, but they can significantly increase volume median diameter (VMD) and broaden the particle-size distribution (PSD). Oil-based products produce emulsions that function to keep small spray drops from forming during the atomization process. A novel DRT adjuvant chemistry has been discovered that reduces fines without increasing VMD or broadening PSD significantly. This novel chemistry is lipophilic surfactants. These surfactants were tank mixed with a glyphosate dilution and their spray PSD was measured using a Sympatec HELOS/KF laser diffraction particle-size analyzer. The experimental procedure followed ASTM Standard Test Method E2798-11 [“Characterization of Performance of Spray Drift Reduction Adjuvants for Ground Application,” Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 11.05, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2011]. The standard uses measurements of particle-size distribution generated when the spray-tank mixture includes the pesticide formulation. The lipophilic surfactant used in this study was an alcohol alkoxylate. This surfactant significantly reduced fines by 40 % to 50 %, and it narrowed the particle-size distribution.

1.
Hewitt
,
A. J.
, “
The Effect of Tank Mix and Adjuvants on Spray Drift
,”
Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Adjuvants for Agrochemicals
,
Memphis, TN
,
1998
, pp. 451–462.
2.
Hewitt
,
A. J.
,
Miller
,
P. C. H.
,
Dexter
,
R. W.
, and
Bagley
,
W. E.
, “
The Influence of Tank Mix Adjuvants on the Formation, Characteristics and Drift Potential of Agricultural Sprays
,”
Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Adjuvants for Agrochemicals
,
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
,
2001
, pp. 547–556.
3.
Miller
,
P. C. H.
,
Hewitt
,
A. J.
, and
Bagley
,
W. E.
, “
Adjuvant Effects on Spray Characteristics and Drift Potential
,”
Pesticide Formulations and Application Systems, ASTM STP 1414
, Vol.
21
,
Mueninghoff
J. C.
,
Viets
A. K.
, and
Downer
R. A.
, Eds.,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
,
2001
, pp. 175–184.
4.
Hewitt
,
A. J.
,
Stern
,
A. J.
,
Bagley
,
W. E.
, and
Dexter
,
R.
, “
The Formation of a New ASTM E35.22 Task Group to Address Drift Management Adjuvants
,”
Pesticide Formulations and Application Systems, ASTM STP 1373
, Vol.
19
,
Tann
R. S.
,
Nalewaja
J. D.
, and
Viets
A. K.
, Eds.,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
,
2001
, pp. 135–148.
5.
Hewitt
,
A. J.
and
Spray Drift Task Force
,
2001
, “
A Summary of Tank Mix and Nozzle Effects on Droplet Size
,” www.agdrift.com/PDF_FILES/Tankmix.pdf (Last accessed 18 Feb
2009
).
6.
Hoffmann
,
W. C.
,
Hewitt
,
A. J.
,
Ross
,
J. B.
,
Bagley
,
W. E.
,
Martin
,
D. E.
, and
Fritz
,
B. K.
, “
Spray Adjuvant Effects on Droplet Size Spectra Measured by Three Laser-Based Systems in a High-Speed Wind Tunnel
,”
Pesticide Formulations and Application Systems, ASTM STP 1478
, Vol.
26
,
Lindner
G.
,
Salyani
M.
, and
Martin
C.
, Eds.,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
,
2008
, pp. 60–71.
7.
Fritz
,
B. K.
,
Hoffmann
,
W. C.
, and
Lan
,
Y.
, “
Evaluation of the EPA Drift Reduction Technology (DRT) Low-Speed Wind Tunnel Protocol
,”
Pesticide Formulations and Application Systems, ASTM STP 1520
, Vol.
29
,
Zollinger
R.
, Ed.,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
,
2010
.
8.
Hoffmann
,
W. C.
,
Fritz
,
B. K.
, and
Lan
,
Y.
, “
Evaluation of a Proposed Drift Reduction Technology High-Speed Wind Tunnel Protocol
,”
Pesticide Formulations and Application Systems, ASTM STP 1520
, Vol.
29
,
Zollinger
R.
, Ed.,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
,
2010
.
9.
Elsik
,
C. M.
,
Stridde
,
H. M.
, and
Schweiner
,
T. M.
, “
Spray Drift Reduction Technology Adjuvant Evaluation
,”
J. ASTM Int.
, Vol.
7
, No.
7
,
2010
, Paper JAI102902.
10.
ASTM E2798-11
,
2011
, “
Characterization of Performance of Spray Drift Reduction Adjuvants for Ground Application
,”
Annual Book of ASTM Standards
, Vol.
11.05
,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
.
11.
ASTM E1260-03
,
2009
, “
Standard Test Method for Determining Liquid Drop Size Characteristics in a Spray Using Optical Nonimaging Light-Scattering Instruments
,”
Annual Book of ASTM Standards
, Vol.
14.02
,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
.
12.
ASABE ANSI/ASAE S572.1
,
2009
, “
Spray Nozzle Classification by Droplet Spectra
,”
American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers
,
St. Joseph, MI
.
13.
Elsik
,
C. M.
,
2011
, “
Round-Robin Evaluation of ASTM Standard Test Method E2798 for Spray Drift Reduction Adjuvants
,”
J. ASTM Int.
, Vol.
8
, No.
8
,
2011
, Paper JAI103719.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal